Pentax DSLRs
Anonymous 09/30/24(Mon)18:54:59 | 163 comments | 69 images
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 09/30/24(Mon)19:20:15 No.4367132
I have a plenty of pentax glass with k-mount I bought for my DSLR and a whole bunch of m42 lenses while I never had a pentax film camera.
Which one is the one to get? So far I've done a little reading and choice seems to be between either MX or LX. Are there any other models to be on the lookout for?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Which one is the one to get? So far I've done a little reading and choice seems to be between either MX or LX. Are there any other models to be on the lookout for?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX Corporation |
Camera Model | PENTAX K10D |
Camera Software | K10D Ver 1.00 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 450 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2023:04:14 09:50:44 |
Exposure Time | 1/60 sec |
F-Number | f/5.6 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 300.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3872 |
Image Height | 2592 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)07:09:30 No.4367382
>>4367132
The MX would be a better option over the LX unless you find a really good condition LX. Feature wise the LX is tempting, but its a fickle camera with a lot of expensive things to go wrong. Love mine, but an MX is just a safer bet. The MZ-S is good if you don't mind the modern styling aswell.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
The MX would be a better option over the LX unless you find a really good condition LX. Feature wise the LX is tempting, but its a fickle camera with a lot of expensive things to go wrong. Love mine, but an MX is just a safer bet. The MZ-S is good if you don't mind the modern styling aswell.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-3 Mark III |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.5.1 (Macintosh) |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 154 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 240 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:10:01 17:53:18 |
Exposure Time | 1/80 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Lens Aperture | f/8.0 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 100.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1667 |
Image Height | 2500 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)07:13:46 No.4367384
I've been looking at an MZ-S for a few months now.
Trick me into buying it.
Trick me into buying it.
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)07:34:16 No.4367387
>>4367384
it prints the shutter and aperture info between the sprocket holes
if I didnt have to pay for a trip to a friend's wedding id be holding one with a battery grip rn and planning on shooting some sports with my 150-450
it prints the shutter and aperture info between the sprocket holes
if I didnt have to pay for a trip to a friend's wedding id be holding one with a battery grip rn and planning on shooting some sports with my 150-450
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)07:50:54 No.4367390
>>4367387
how is the autocofus compared to the old EOS film bodies for example?
I don't own any autofocus cameras at the moment. I shoot even birds with a 300mm with manual focus.
how is the autocofus compared to the old EOS film bodies for example?
I don't own any autofocus cameras at the moment. I shoot even birds with a 300mm with manual focus.
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)08:07:05 No.4367395
>>4367390
It's okay, not amazing, but it's there from what i've heard. There's a few videos on youtube by people who used them for work etc back in the early 2000s I think that mention it being reliable but not fast
It's okay, not amazing, but it's there from what i've heard. There's a few videos on youtube by people who used them for work etc back in the early 2000s I think that mention it being reliable but not fast
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)08:21:44 No.4367397
>>4367112
Seems like Clive is so desperate for attention he's making fake Pentax threads to shill Pentax pancakes. They are for DSLR so it doesn't make them smaller. Imagine being so pathetic you hate on Sony this much. How miserable is your life Clive?
Seems like Clive is so desperate for attention he's making fake Pentax threads to shill Pentax pancakes. They are for DSLR so it doesn't make them smaller. Imagine being so pathetic you hate on Sony this much. How miserable is your life Clive?
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)20:47:31 No.4367818
>>4367382
copped MX not long after posting, once I read more in depth about the issues that may affect LX
looking forward to using it
copped MX not long after posting, once I read more in depth about the issues that may affect LX
looking forward to using it
Anonymous 10/01/24(Tue)22:19:05 No.4367836
>>4367397
shut up clive
shut up clive
Anonymous 10/02/24(Wed)01:46:00 No.4367893
>>4367397
I know right its truly sad and pathetic to be a Sony hater. Any comment trashing Sony is posted by Clive. Guy probably works at an IHOP making pancakes.
I know right its truly sad and pathetic to be a Sony hater. Any comment trashing Sony is posted by Clive. Guy probably works at an IHOP making pancakes.
Anonymous 10/04/24(Fri)07:41:46 No.4369040
Now that the old thread is gone, I'll continue with the rest of the outdoor pictures.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 10/06/24(Sun)00:02:01 No.4369632
>>4367112
Almost bought a K-3 III. I keep resisting the purchase button. It's dumb as hell, but something in me just kind of got sick of EVF's. No pretentious artistry crap about 'it's the real light', I just don't want to stare at another screen.
What lenses do you recommend?
Almost bought a K-3 III. I keep resisting the purchase button. It's dumb as hell, but something in me just kind of got sick of EVF's. No pretentious artistry crap about 'it's the real light', I just don't want to stare at another screen.
What lenses do you recommend?
Anonymous 10/06/24(Sun)10:31:19 No.4369753
Anonymous 10/07/24(Mon)16:43:05 No.4370263
>>4367397
Stop trying to derail legitimate threads Colin
Stop trying to derail legitimate threads Colin
Anonymous 10/07/24(Mon)16:58:12 No.4370271
>>4369753
Any specific lenses that stand out? Debating picking one up off of Amazon, that way I can return it, if I don’t like it.
Any specific lenses that stand out? Debating picking one up off of Amazon, that way I can return it, if I don’t like it.
Anonymous 10/07/24(Mon)22:37:37 No.4370389
>>4370271
The 43mm f1.9 limited comes to mind
The 43mm f1.9 limited comes to mind
Anonymous 10/09/24(Wed)16:56:02 No.4371540
Recent pic with minor edits. I shot this one in raw for a change.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Color Filter Array Pattern | 34784 |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 52 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Width | 1800 |
Image Height | 1200 |
Compression Scheme | Unknown |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Data Arrangement | Chunky Format |
Image Created | 2024:10:03 19:51:59 |
Exposure Time | 10 sec |
F-Number | f/13.0 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 35.00 mm |
Image Width | 1800 |
Image Height | 1200 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 10/09/24(Wed)21:09:48 No.4371653
>>4369632
>It's dumb as hell, but something in me just kind of got sick of EVF's.
I feel the same way, but for me it's kind of pretentious: A DSLR feels like it's capturing an image once you see it on the back screen, instead of taking a screencap of the EVF stream. Especially if you use electronic shutter and burst modes with the mirrorless camera. Unfortunately I'm stuck with mirrorless because I bought the lenses.
>>4371540
Nice capture but the subject does nothing for me
>It's dumb as hell, but something in me just kind of got sick of EVF's.
I feel the same way, but for me it's kind of pretentious: A DSLR feels like it's capturing an image once you see it on the back screen, instead of taking a screencap of the EVF stream. Especially if you use electronic shutter and burst modes with the mirrorless camera. Unfortunately I'm stuck with mirrorless because I bought the lenses.
>>4371540
Nice capture but the subject does nothing for me
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)02:42:40 No.4371729
It's hilarious how good the K1 is with Pixel Shift but i have never been convinced about the glass in terms of price and variety.
If i ever get one i think of a kit composed of 15-30 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8, FA Limited 21, 43 and 77 and maybe the 50mm f1.4 Golden Star... yet there's no cheap 200-5/600 f5.6 and no cheap f2.8 and below after the 85mm range, or at least cheap compared to Nikon/Canon, because the difference between a Nikkor 180 f2.8 and the Pentax version is just too much.
Also the old lenses have soft rubber rings, come on now. It's been years and the glass just isn't convincing.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
If i ever get one i think of a kit composed of 15-30 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8, FA Limited 21, 43 and 77 and maybe the 50mm f1.4 Golden Star... yet there's no cheap 200-5/600 f5.6 and no cheap f2.8 and below after the 85mm range, or at least cheap compared to Nikon/Canon, because the difference between a Nikkor 180 f2.8 and the Pentax version is just too much.
Also the old lenses have soft rubber rings, come on now. It's been years and the glass just isn't convincing.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Photographer | ZEGABY |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)11:52:54 No.4371869
>>4371653
There's no subject
There's no subject
Anonymous 10/12/24(Sat)14:27:23 No.4372916
redpill me on the monochrome dslr
Anonymous 10/12/24(Sat)21:05:31 No.4373074
>>4371869
You can't see the corner of the building in that pic?
You can't see the corner of the building in that pic?
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)04:09:51 No.4373221
>>4373074
Most of my pics have no subject
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Most of my pics have no subject
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 52 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:09:28 17:51:56 |
Exposure Time | 1/60 sec |
F-Number | f/4.0 |
Exposure Program | Creative |
ISO Speed Rating | 140 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 35.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)04:21:21 No.4373223
>>4371729
The K1 is the best digital camera ever made and it's being buried by the lack of good lenses.
The K1 is the best digital camera ever made and it's being buried by the lack of good lenses.
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)04:55:51 No.4373235
>>4373221
Every image has a salient features though. Even this one I would say it's the orange looking tree
Every image has a salient features though. Even this one I would say it's the orange looking tree
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)05:18:21 No.4373241
>>4373221
>Most of my pics have no subject
That's literally impossible but a great cope for not thinking about your compositions
>Most of my pics have no subject
That's literally impossible but a great cope for not thinking about your compositions
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)18:46:48 No.4373581
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)19:31:10 No.4373588
>>4373221
>no subject
Wrong, your subject (green zone) is clearly the trail and the background (second red zone) compliments it due to leading lines pointing or going parallel with the leading line of the subject (shown in orange pointers) like the water body and the other trail, trees all give pauses and framing, including the ones in the foreground (first red zone).
If we could see the water body more clearly, as in no vegetation to cover it, it would be much nicer. But there is a subject, not wanting to see it means lack of discerning theory or >>4373241 a coping mechanism.
>no subject
Wrong, your subject (green zone) is clearly the trail and the background (second red zone) compliments it due to leading lines pointing or going parallel with the leading line of the subject (shown in orange pointers) like the water body and the other trail, trees all give pauses and framing, including the ones in the foreground (first red zone).
If we could see the water body more clearly, as in no vegetation to cover it, it would be much nicer. But there is a subject, not wanting to see it means lack of discerning theory or >>4373241 a coping mechanism.
Anonymous 10/15/24(Tue)16:23:21 No.4374282
Leaves in motion
>>4373581
Nice scene
>>4371729
Majestic. Not sure about the tree in the foreground.
>>4373588
Thanks for your detailed analysis. Next time I'm there I might go for a close-up on the stone light fixture thing near the middle.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>4373581
Nice scene
>>4371729
Majestic. Not sure about the tree in the foreground.
>>4373588
Thanks for your detailed analysis. Next time I'm there I might go for a close-up on the stone light fixture thing near the middle.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 75 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:10:15 19:40:57 |
Exposure Time | 1/350 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 1600 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 50.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 10/26/24(Sat)09:28:20 No.4378196
Can you or can you not disable the RAW denoising "feature" of the K-1 II?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop 22.2 (Macintosh) |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2021:02:26 13:29:20 |
Comment | Screenshot |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1180 |
Image Height | 1009 |
Anonymous 10/27/24(Sun)12:59:54 No.4378551
>>4378196
Why disable it if it gives less noise?
Why disable it if it gives less noise?
Anonymous 10/27/24(Sun)13:05:00 No.4378554
>>4378551
All raw cooking causes artefacts when pushing shadows to avoid bracketing faggortry or when stacking for astro
All raw cooking causes artefacts when pushing shadows to avoid bracketing faggortry or when stacking for astro
Anonymous 10/27/24(Sun)14:44:30 No.4378570
>>4373581
f11, but I wish it was a little lower so the pines were a little less prominent
>>4378196
I can't say 100%, but I think it's inherent to the accelerator unit and I saw a post from 2018 that it wasn't a switchable option and it was never mentioned in the firmware update summaries
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
f11, but I wish it was a little lower so the pines were a little less prominent
>>4378196
I can't say 100%, but I think it's inherent to the accelerator unit and I saw a post from 2018 that it wasn't a switchable option and it was never mentioned in the firmware update summaries
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 10/27/24(Sun)15:09:37 No.4378580
My vintage screw-mount 50mm isn't very sharp at max aperture. The pictures are quite hazy. Do the newer (K-mount) 50mm lenses like the DA50, F/FA50, HD FA50, etc produce sharper results?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 0 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Right-Hand, Top |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:10:20 20:07:19 |
Exposure Time | 1/180 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 0.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 10/27/24(Sun)19:07:30 No.4378669
>>4378580
This is handheld f1.8 with the plastic da50 with the k70. The focus was on the eye.
I think there is a little softness at max aperture based off this and a couple of other test pictures. I posted a f1.8 test pic with the same lens of some silverware in a blue cup from my kx in a previous thread. It also had a little softness.
It's hard to tell against the screw mount without a direct comparison. I think the bokeh may be smoother with the da50.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
This is handheld f1.8 with the plastic da50 with the k70. The focus was on the eye.
I think there is a little softness at max aperture based off this and a couple of other test pictures. I posted a f1.8 test pic with the same lens of some silverware in a blue cup from my kx in a previous thread. It also had a little softness.
It's hard to tell against the screw mount without a direct comparison. I think the bokeh may be smoother with the da50.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 10/28/24(Mon)08:40:23 No.4378847
>>4378558
>i can't compose so no one can
Get good scrub
>i can't compose so no one can
Get good scrub
Anonymous 10/28/24(Mon)17:43:29 No.4378973
>>4378847
>You need to follow some pretentious and arbitrary set a rules so that your photos look like everyone else's photos!!!
>You need to follow some pretentious and arbitrary set a rules so that your photos look like everyone else's photos!!!
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)04:48:23 No.4379118
>>4378551
because it's extremely retarded to do anything raw related in camera
it gets outdated before the camera is even released lmao
especially with denoising
remember when profiled denoising wasn't a thing?
remember when AI denoising (which is just a profiled denoising on steroids really) wasn't a thing?
because it's extremely retarded to do anything raw related in camera
it gets outdated before the camera is even released lmao
especially with denoising
remember when profiled denoising wasn't a thing?
remember when AI denoising (which is just a profiled denoising on steroids really) wasn't a thing?
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)17:36:27 No.4379379
>>4378551
Destroys the image quality at high ISO or when recovering shadows, there's loads of videos showcasing this, the most common effect is purple tinging.
There's a reason Pentax fags swear by the original K1, II only had the added bonus of having japanese-only special editions that are rad as fuck. And also purple.
Destroys the image quality at high ISO or when recovering shadows, there's loads of videos showcasing this, the most common effect is purple tinging.
There's a reason Pentax fags swear by the original K1, II only had the added bonus of having japanese-only special editions that are rad as fuck. And also purple.
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)17:38:22 No.4379381
>>4378973
>pretentious and arbitrary set a rules
There's no rules, only possibilities which are seen more and more depending on taste and experience, both given by watching photos and taking photos, both which also evade you due to not doing it.
>pretentious and arbitrary set a rules
There's no rules, only possibilities which are seen more and more depending on taste and experience, both given by watching photos and taking photos, both which also evade you due to not doing it.
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)19:33:12 No.4379441
>>4378855
what, people aren't allowed to take photos of their cute figures?
>>4379379
>the most common effect is purple tinging
interesting, my mk1 also does this, but also only when pushed really hard
I don't have a mk2 to compare it against to see if it's just blatantly more obvious with that one
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
what, people aren't allowed to take photos of their cute figures?
>>4379379
>the most common effect is purple tinging
interesting, my mk1 also does this, but also only when pushed really hard
I don't have a mk2 to compare it against to see if it's just blatantly more obvious with that one
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-1 |
Camera Software | darktable 4.8.0 |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 63 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Image Created | 2024:10:19 23:28:15 |
Exposure Time | 1/80 sec |
F-Number | f/4.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash |
Focal Length | 63.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 2400 |
Image Height | 1920 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)20:13:13 No.4379447
>>4379441
Some mk. I bodies were retrofit with the mk. II sensor, if you bought it used or refurbished then it's probably the same problem, if not then you push it extremely hard.
Some mk. I bodies were retrofit with the mk. II sensor, if you bought it used or refurbished then it's probably the same problem, if not then you push it extremely hard.
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)20:48:49 No.4379455
>>4379447
bought used but pretty sure it doesn't have the II sensor, since I only start seeing it start to creep in around effective ISO 51200
picrel is ISO 20000 +1EV w/ vignette correction for the D FA 24-70 2.8 which iirc is at least 1 stop in the corners
bought used but pretty sure it doesn't have the II sensor, since I only start seeing it start to creep in around effective ISO 51200
picrel is ISO 20000 +1EV w/ vignette correction for the D FA 24-70 2.8 which iirc is at least 1 stop in the corners
Anonymous 10/29/24(Tue)21:07:20 No.4379464
Anonymous 10/30/24(Wed)01:21:44 No.4379543
>>4379447
check where the symbol that says SR is. if it has a "II" in its place then it's had the guts switched out
check where the symbol that says SR is. if it has a "II" in its place then it's had the guts switched out
Anonymous 10/31/24(Thu)04:54:07 No.4379955
Does anyone have any strong opinions about the K-5 vs the K-7? I want to pick up one of them. I've been wanting a weather sealed crop body for a travel camera. I have the K-01, and I quite like the sensor and it is basically the same sensor as the K-5. But part of me wants to experiment with the older sensor.
I am also looking at two lenses, the Pentax SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL DC WR and the Pentax-HD Pentax DA 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 ED DC WR
I'm temped to go with the 18-135, it's smaller, lighter, and cheaper. I'm not particularly fussed about image quality and I doubt I'll use the wider fov, but the 16-85 is only like ~$30 more.
Thoughts?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
I am also looking at two lenses, the Pentax SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL DC WR and the Pentax-HD Pentax DA 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 ED DC WR
I'm temped to go with the 18-135, it's smaller, lighter, and cheaper. I'm not particularly fussed about image quality and I doubt I'll use the wider fov, but the 16-85 is only like ~$30 more.
Thoughts?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-01 |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.0.1 (Windows) |
Photographer | EDERN FULUP |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 57 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 141 dpcm |
Vertical Resolution | 141 dpcm |
Image Created | 2024:10:31 01:53:44 |
Exposure Time | 1/30 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 8000 |
Lens Aperture | f/4.5 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 37.50 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 10/31/24(Thu)18:17:50 No.4380145
No comment about those lenses. But I like the K-7 a lot. I've had it for about 1 year. K-5 is a newer model, so maybe it has lower noise at high ISOs
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 79 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:07:24 22:22:05 |
Exposure Time | 1/90 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Creative |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 1 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 53.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 10/31/24(Thu)18:45:49 No.4380153
>>4380145
Ironically I was considering the K-7 Because it'd be noisier I've started shooting all my digital bodies around 400-800 iso because I like a little noise in my images. But I was also really impressed with my K-01 at 8000, considering. I did find a good deal on a K-5 on ebay, so I put I bid in. If that doesn't work out, maybe I'll look more at the K-7
Ironically I was considering the K-7 Because it'd be noisier I've started shooting all my digital bodies around 400-800 iso because I like a little noise in my images. But I was also really impressed with my K-01 at 8000, considering. I did find a good deal on a K-5 on ebay, so I put I bid in. If that doesn't work out, maybe I'll look more at the K-7
Anonymous 11/01/24(Fri)15:07:03 No.4380406
Are there premium manual focus lenses for K mount? I've used a few Voigtlanders and Zeiss lenses over the years and I'm getting a hankering for them again but looking around it doesn't look like either company really made lenses for the mount. on ebay there are a few Zeiss lenses, but they are wildly overpriced. So what are my options? Should I adapt from another mount?
Anonymous 11/02/24(Sat)13:47:04 No.4380712
Anonymous 11/02/24(Sat)19:15:19 No.4380762
>>4378669
I think mine has a different level of sharpness depending on the subject distance. Close up ones look quite okay with +1 or +2 sharpness set in camera.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
I think mine has a different level of sharpness depending on the subject distance. Close up ones look quite okay with +1 or +2 sharpness set in camera.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 0 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:11:03 01:19:55 |
Exposure Time | 0.7 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 0.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 11/02/24(Sat)19:17:49 No.4380763
>>4380762
But if the subject is farther away it doesn't look too good.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
But if the subject is farther away it doesn't look too good.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:10:20 20:00:06 |
Exposure Time | 1/350 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 11/02/24(Sat)19:20:18 No.4380765
>>4380763
Comparison
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Comparison
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:10:20 19:59:52 |
Exposure Time | 1/125 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 400 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 11/02/24(Sat)19:43:20 No.4380769
>>4380406
voightlander makes/made k mout lenses, i think zeiss did too. there are some nice small modernish colour-skopar voightlanders in native k.
there is a way to convert nikon zeiss to k mount, its called zk mount. there was a boomer on pentax forums who was in to it.
seems like a waste of time to me when the limiteds are better in everyway except artificial benchmarks and clout. especially if you are paying zeiss money, just get a second camera
voightlander makes/made k mout lenses, i think zeiss did too. there are some nice small modernish colour-skopar voightlanders in native k.
there is a way to convert nikon zeiss to k mount, its called zk mount. there was a boomer on pentax forums who was in to it.
seems like a waste of time to me when the limiteds are better in everyway except artificial benchmarks and clout. especially if you are paying zeiss money, just get a second camera
Anonymous 11/02/24(Sat)20:56:17 No.4380780
The brotherhood of the solenoid failure
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-30 |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 75 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 240 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:11:02 20:38:56 |
Exposure Time | 1/30 sec |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 800 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Spot |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 50.00 mm |
Color Space Information | Uncalibrated |
Image Width | 662 |
Image Height | 1000 |
Anonymous 11/03/24(Sun)20:17:51 No.4381269
>>4380763
That close up looks pretty sharp, but it does seem something's off with the far focus. It seems like some area should be sharp.
I took some more pictures in my living room with the K-70 from farther away 10-15 ft and I would say it was equivalent to what you see with the figure with the light softness, but no drastic changes. The figure picture gives a good idea of what to expect.
I also tried with the K-X and I was having a lot more trouble with the focus, but at least one of the f1.8 looked similar.
Probably any of the new 50s would be sharper just because it looks like something's off. The macro 50 is sharp at 2.8, its widest aperature.
>>4378570
f6.3 This turned out to be interesting with the ants, but I probably took it from the wrong angle.
>>4379955
Used? That seems like either a bad price for the 18-135 or a deal for the 16-85.
Based off what you said, it seems like the 50mm reach difference might be the thing to consider.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
That close up looks pretty sharp, but it does seem something's off with the far focus. It seems like some area should be sharp.
I took some more pictures in my living room with the K-70 from farther away 10-15 ft and I would say it was equivalent to what you see with the figure with the light softness, but no drastic changes. The figure picture gives a good idea of what to expect.
I also tried with the K-X and I was having a lot more trouble with the focus, but at least one of the f1.8 looked similar.
Probably any of the new 50s would be sharper just because it looks like something's off. The macro 50 is sharp at 2.8, its widest aperature.
>>4378570
f6.3 This turned out to be interesting with the ants, but I probably took it from the wrong angle.
>>4379955
Used? That seems like either a bad price for the 18-135 or a deal for the 16-85.
Based off what you said, it seems like the 50mm reach difference might be the thing to consider.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 11/03/24(Sun)20:26:57 No.4381271
>>4381269
>Used?
yes, used. I was mistaken though, it was like a $50 difference. The 18-135's go for about $150, there was a copy of the 16-85 on mpb for $200 with no hood, I should have grabbed it because now it's gone. I think the extra telephoto reach on the 18-135 wouldn't be used. But it is a smaller lens which is appealing to me, I'm not picky about optical quality. I guess it's just a matter of 'which do I buy first'. I want to try them out and see how I get along with each of them.
>Used?
yes, used. I was mistaken though, it was like a $50 difference. The 18-135's go for about $150, there was a copy of the 16-85 on mpb for $200 with no hood, I should have grabbed it because now it's gone. I think the extra telephoto reach on the 18-135 wouldn't be used. But it is a smaller lens which is appealing to me, I'm not picky about optical quality. I guess it's just a matter of 'which do I buy first'. I want to try them out and see how I get along with each of them.
Anonymous 11/03/24(Sun)20:30:49 No.4381273
Anonymous 11/04/24(Mon)01:27:54 No.4381336
>>4380769
>Limited FA better than ZF lenses
Surely you are coping, the L FA line is great but some Zeiss lenses are superb
>Limited FA better than ZF lenses
Surely you are coping, the L FA line is great but some Zeiss lenses are superb
Anonymous 11/04/24(Mon)03:58:05 No.4381362
>>4381336
the law diminishing returns applies on Zeiss glass well
spending 2/3/4/5 times as much to get an almost indistinguishable optical performance is dare I say retarded
and I don't mean it in pentcuck vs zeiss glass only terms either
many high end lenses are as good if not better than Zeiss glass
IMHO zeiss glass is only worth it for the complete Contax larp (and some of the Contax cameras are indeed extremely nice like the ST or 167MT)
the law diminishing returns applies on Zeiss glass well
spending 2/3/4/5 times as much to get an almost indistinguishable optical performance is dare I say retarded
and I don't mean it in pentcuck vs zeiss glass only terms either
many high end lenses are as good if not better than Zeiss glass
IMHO zeiss glass is only worth it for the complete Contax larp (and some of the Contax cameras are indeed extremely nice like the ST or 167MT)
Anonymous 11/04/24(Mon)17:23:54 No.4381520
>>4381269
It could be that I slightly misfocused the tree picture. It's very easy to miss the focus
Macro 50 might be an interesting option for nature photography. The new HD FA 50/1.4 seems nice too. too bad there aren't that many sample pics taken with it at f/1.4. Try your DA50 sometimes at f/1.8 with a landscape scene and post results. Curious
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
It could be that I slightly misfocused the tree picture. It's very easy to miss the focus
Macro 50 might be an interesting option for nature photography. The new HD FA 50/1.4 seems nice too. too bad there aren't that many sample pics taken with it at f/1.4. Try your DA50 sometimes at f/1.8 with a landscape scene and post results. Curious
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 79 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:07:20 19:20:07 |
Exposure Time | 1/30 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Creative |
ISO Speed Rating | 3200 |
Exposure Bias | 1/2 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 53.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/09/24(Sat)17:26:25 No.4383314
Autumn evening
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Color Filter Array Pattern | 34784 |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 90 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Width | 1800 |
Image Height | 1200 |
Compression Scheme | Unknown |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Data Arrangement | Chunky Format |
Image Created | 2024:11:09 16:35:43 |
Exposure Time | 1/45 sec |
F-Number | f/9.5 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 1 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 60.00 mm |
Image Width | 1800 |
Image Height | 1200 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 11/09/24(Sat)17:32:57 No.4383315
>>4383314
I think I preferred the version of this one you said was underexposed, but it is a nice shot. I really like the color of the sky and the light on just the buildings.
I think I preferred the version of this one you said was underexposed, but it is a nice shot. I really like the color of the sky and the light on just the buildings.
Anonymous 11/10/24(Sun)04:28:12 No.4383464
So I've been digging into my menus more and reading the manual a bit and the TAv mode is easily one of the best features I didn't know I wanted. It's great for shooting handheld in low light. It also seems good for dynamic environments. I know I've definitely missed shots because I saw something while in aperture priority and wished I had been in shutter priority to capture something with motion blur and it was too slow to change. I'm definitely going to play around with it some more.
Anonymous 11/10/24(Sun)12:31:57 No.4383586
Anonymous 11/10/24(Sun)17:51:20 No.4383672
>>4367112
is the weird puprle shit with the K1 Mk2 anything to really worry about or should i just get the K1
is the weird puprle shit with the K1 Mk2 anything to really worry about or should i just get the K1
Anonymous 11/10/24(Sun)19:17:30 No.4383701
>>4383672
Just get the K-1, it's cheaper and iirc the only real difference is that the mkii bakes in noise reduction to the raws, and I thought the denoised images looked worse than the ones straight from the K-1
Just get the K-1, it's cheaper and iirc the only real difference is that the mkii bakes in noise reduction to the raws, and I thought the denoised images looked worse than the ones straight from the K-1
Anonymous 11/10/24(Sun)19:26:54 No.4383704
>>4381269
Last one, worse than the other yellow ants one.
>>4381520
Looking again, the top, dark part of the trunk may be in focus and it could just be all the leaves in front and behind that are not focused make the whole tree look blurred. I will try to get a da50 1.8 landscape for you, but I don't know when.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Last one, worse than the other yellow ants one.
>>4381520
Looking again, the top, dark part of the trunk may be in focus and it could just be all the leaves in front and behind that are not focused make the whole tree look blurred. I will try to get a da50 1.8 landscape for you, but I don't know when.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 11/11/24(Mon)00:27:36 No.4383765
The Pentax K-1 is too good. It's not fair, I don't have a reason to gearfag anymore. I think about buying something, then I think "yeah, but will it be better than the K-1?" and the answer is always no. It's fucking gay.
Anonymous 11/11/24(Mon)07:36:06 No.4383832
>>4383765
what does the k-1 have over say the d850?
what does the k-1 have over say the d850?
Anonymous 11/11/24(Mon)09:20:32 No.4383847
Anonymous 11/11/24(Mon)09:35:44 No.4383852
>>4383832
Much worse and fewer lenses
Autofocus off a d200
Meter bugs and broken mode dials
Gay spider legged screen that can’t flip up
Gimmicks you’ll never use like 0.5mm of shift for pc
Much worse and fewer lenses
Autofocus off a d200
Meter bugs and broken mode dials
Gay spider legged screen that can’t flip up
Gimmicks you’ll never use like 0.5mm of shift for pc
Anonymous 11/16/24(Sat)15:21:23 No.4385783
I managed to remove some of the yellowing from my vintage 50 lens. I left it under an Ikea lamp for about a week. No test shots yet. Pic unrelated.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 72 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:11:03 19:10:56 |
Exposure Time | 1/45 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 48.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Soft |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 11/16/24(Sat)16:04:22 No.4385785
>>4385783
which Ikea lamp?
which Ikea lamp?
Anonymous 11/16/24(Sat)22:00:53 No.4385886
>>4385785
The yellow one, duh
The yellow one, duh
Anonymous 11/19/24(Tue)11:17:48 No.4386452
Seriously considering getting a k3-iii monochrome. What lens should I get to complement it? Right now I'm looking at either the 24mm f/2 or maybe the 20-40mm f/2.8-4?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 11/19/24(Tue)11:37:08 No.4386456
>>4386452
The tragedy of pentax is unlike leica, they dont actually have a lens that holds up to this high pixel density+monochrome.
The tragedy of pentax is unlike leica, they dont actually have a lens that holds up to this high pixel density+monochrome.
Anonymous 11/19/24(Tue)17:21:58 No.4386540
>>4386452
>the 20-40mm f/2.8-4
Notorious for being pretty unique despite its lackluster speed and range
By unique i mean renders with the character of an old prime lens, odd for a APS-C zoom
>the 20-40mm f/2.8-4
Notorious for being pretty unique despite its lackluster speed and range
By unique i mean renders with the character of an old prime lens, odd for a APS-C zoom
Anonymous 11/20/24(Wed)04:32:20 No.4386637
>>4386456
The new 16-50 plm zoom might come close if only one could afford it
The new 16-50 plm zoom might come close if only one could afford it
Anonymous 11/20/24(Wed)07:35:57 No.4386666
Anonymous 11/20/24(Wed)08:13:20 No.4386670
>>4386452
Looking forward to your future B&W threads of building corners and back of peoples' heads
Looking forward to your future B&W threads of building corners and back of peoples' heads
Anonymous 11/20/24(Wed)10:12:05 No.4386693
Just ordered a Samsung gx10 (pentax k10d) for cheap
Excited to see how it compared to a Nikon D70. Will keep it if the backfocus issues are manageable. Supposedly can dial it in using the debug menu.
Excited to see how it compared to a Nikon D70. Will keep it if the backfocus issues are manageable. Supposedly can dial it in using the debug menu.
Anonymous 11/21/24(Thu)00:45:39 No.4386948
>>4386693
Prepare yourself for doing lots of focus bracketing.
Prepare yourself for doing lots of focus bracketing.
Anonymous 11/23/24(Sat)15:20:21 No.4387626
>>4386948
Received gx10. Focus was way off as expected. Dialed in as much as possible w/ debug menu. Kit lens is the softest lens I have ever owned by a mile. Here's a SOOC jpeg with in-camera sharpening maxed.
Might play around with it a bit more then hawk it off to the next guy. At least the camera itself is in great condition.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Received gx10. Focus was way off as expected. Dialed in as much as possible w/ debug menu. Kit lens is the softest lens I have ever owned by a mile. Here's a SOOC jpeg with in-camera sharpening maxed.
Might play around with it a bit more then hawk it off to the next guy. At least the camera itself is in great condition.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co. |
Camera Model | SAMSUNG GX10 |
Camera Software | GX10 Ver 1.30 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2006:01:01 01:49:54 |
Exposure Time | 1/250 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3872 |
Image Height | 2592 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/23/24(Sat)19:01:37 No.4387647
>>4387626
Is that the original DA 18-55 kit lens and not the "II" version? I think overexposure is a bigger problem in that picture. Flower petals clip colour channels very easily in direct sunlight.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Is that the original DA 18-55 kit lens and not the "II" version? I think overexposure is a bigger problem in that picture. Flower petals clip colour channels very easily in direct sunlight.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 120 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:10:26 18:22:56 |
Exposure Time | 1/10 sec |
F-Number | f/5.6 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 1100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 80.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/23/24(Sat)20:05:03 No.4387653
>>4387647
it's a schneider-kreuznach d-xenon 3.5-5.6 18-55 AL.. which is a rebadged Pentax something or other
... You do realize that is just a test shot for sharpness right?
it's a schneider-kreuznach d-xenon 3.5-5.6 18-55 AL.. which is a rebadged Pentax something or other
... You do realize that is just a test shot for sharpness right?
Anonymous 11/23/24(Sat)20:08:24 No.4387654
>>4387647
Went back and checked the raw/jpg it's not overexposed, no clipping at all.
Went back and checked the raw/jpg it's not overexposed, no clipping at all.
Anonymous 11/23/24(Sat)23:57:35 No.4387692
Maybe I just expected too much.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co. |
Camera Model | SAMSUNG GX10 |
Camera Software | darktable 4.8.1 |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Image Created | 2024:11:23 20:54:43 |
Exposure Time | 4 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3872 |
Image Height | 2592 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)10:49:01 No.4387739
>>4387715
>pretty okay
Yeah that seems about right
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>pretty okay
Yeah that seems about right
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co. |
Camera Model | SAMSUNG GX10 |
Camera Software | GX10 Ver 1.30 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2006:01:01 21:44:57 |
Exposure Time | 1/80 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 800 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3872 |
Image Height | 2592 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)12:49:25 No.4387771
Seems like the AF even when dialed in is just unreliable. Same with exposure. At least the default colors seem nice for what it is. When it works it works... okay.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co. |
Camera Model | SAMSUNG GX10 |
Camera Software | GX10 Ver 1.30 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2006:01:01 23:18:18 |
Exposure Time | 1/125 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 800 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3872 |
Image Height | 2592 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)15:44:30 No.4387836
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)15:47:41 No.4387838
>>4387836
It adds to the faux-authenticity of the snapshits
It adds to the faux-authenticity of the snapshits
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)17:36:08 No.4387861
Been interested in this lens lately. Anyone tried it on your cameras yet?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX 645Z |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop 21.2 (Windows) |
Photographer | M.KOB |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 94 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Width | 3310 |
Image Height | 2663 |
Number of Bits Per Component | 8, 8, 8 |
Compression Scheme | Uncompressed |
Pixel Composition | RGB |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 350 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 350 dpi |
Image Data Arrangement | Chunky Format |
Image Created | 2023:05:15 18:14:47 |
Exposure Time | 1/100 sec |
F-Number | f/22.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Lens Aperture | f/22.0 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 120.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3310 |
Image Height | 2663 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)20:33:19 No.4387874
I'm considering a Pentax DLSR because I have a specifically autistic desire for having the option to use the same lenses for both film and digital (ideally without adapting). I already own a Program A and a SMC 50/f1.4.
How is the experience of using these older lenses on the K-1/K-1Mk2?
Are the newer Pentax full frame lenses backwards compatible with the Program A? I know the focus rings tend to be quite quick and slippery on the new ones having owned a 20-40/f4 Limited - does anyone with experience consider this annoying?
How is the manual focusing experience in the K-1(/Mk2)? Is there an electronic focusing confirmation aid; is the focusing screen interchangeable for a split prism screen?
How is the experience of using these older lenses on the K-1/K-1Mk2?
Are the newer Pentax full frame lenses backwards compatible with the Program A? I know the focus rings tend to be quite quick and slippery on the new ones having owned a 20-40/f4 Limited - does anyone with experience consider this annoying?
How is the manual focusing experience in the K-1(/Mk2)? Is there an electronic focusing confirmation aid; is the focusing screen interchangeable for a split prism screen?
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)20:37:40 No.4387875
>>4387874
The autofocus is somehow worse than a 2007 nikon DSLR, with a focusing screen that is so thick and low res you can see the fresnel lines better than critical focus. Switch to F mount to share between film and DSLRs if the gimmicks (ie: IBIS) dont matter to you
EF to share between film and mirrorless
The autofocus is somehow worse than a 2007 nikon DSLR, with a focusing screen that is so thick and low res you can see the fresnel lines better than critical focus. Switch to F mount to share between film and DSLRs if the gimmicks (ie: IBIS) dont matter to you
EF to share between film and mirrorless
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)20:50:43 No.4387876
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)21:00:47 No.4387877
>>4387875
>EF to share between film and mirrorless
Aren't most EF lenses a bit bulky to be adapting for mirrorless cameras? Seems to defeat a major pro of using mirrorless over DSLR. Would rather have a chunky body with a small lens than the opposite. I know EF has a shorter flange distance than F so the problem isn't as pronounced for Canon but still.
Besides Pentax my other idea was to get a used last or previous gen Nikon DSLR platform for the Voigtlander lenses that are also perfectly compatible with my F3 and do better on digital than the equivalent AI-S.
The last (and probably most rational) alternative would be to grab a 1V to complement my 5D4 as I do have a couple EF lenses already.
Yes, my gear is very inefficient, it's mostly hand me downs.
>EF to share between film and mirrorless
Aren't most EF lenses a bit bulky to be adapting for mirrorless cameras? Seems to defeat a major pro of using mirrorless over DSLR. Would rather have a chunky body with a small lens than the opposite. I know EF has a shorter flange distance than F so the problem isn't as pronounced for Canon but still.
Besides Pentax my other idea was to get a used last or previous gen Nikon DSLR platform for the Voigtlander lenses that are also perfectly compatible with my F3 and do better on digital than the equivalent AI-S.
The last (and probably most rational) alternative would be to grab a 1V to complement my 5D4 as I do have a couple EF lenses already.
Yes, my gear is very inefficient, it's mostly hand me downs.
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)21:11:34 No.4387880
>>4387877
RF native lenses are also huge, and not even that good ($1500 24mm prime doesnt illuminate the whole sensor lol)
Its no sony/fuj
RF native lenses are also huge, and not even that good ($1500 24mm prime doesnt illuminate the whole sensor lol)
Its no sony/fuj
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)21:14:59 No.4387881
>>4387874
I use pentax digital bodies and pentax mx with the same pentax and adapted lenses and as long as they have aperture rings will work on both and the A lenses will also be able to shoot on digital in aperture priority mode as the aperture can be controlled from the body. With M lenses you have to go to manual mode and use the green button to measure the light before shooting.
I'm really enjoying the experience overall
I use pentax digital bodies and pentax mx with the same pentax and adapted lenses and as long as they have aperture rings will work on both and the A lenses will also be able to shoot on digital in aperture priority mode as the aperture can be controlled from the body. With M lenses you have to go to manual mode and use the green button to measure the light before shooting.
I'm really enjoying the experience overall
Anonymous 11/24/24(Sun)21:32:39 No.4387885
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)01:55:33 No.4387894
whats the appeal? i mean this nicely
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)08:52:38 No.4387909
>>4387894
Top-tier bodies who can withstand tons of abuse and have tons of specs other brands do not have, great viewfinders, tons of button customization and modes, that's it i suppose
Top-tier bodies who can withstand tons of abuse and have tons of specs other brands do not have, great viewfinders, tons of button customization and modes, that's it i suppose
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)10:04:28 No.4387914
>>4387894
I hate canonikon and snoy garbage like you wouldn't believe it
I hate canonikon and snoy garbage like you wouldn't believe it
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)11:45:50 No.4387917
>>4387894
Bodies are tanks, loads of cheap used lenses
Bodies are tanks, loads of cheap used lenses
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)13:14:08 No.4387931
>>4387894
It's a hipster brand. Nothing more. Pentax is borderline out of business and no longer improving. In fact, if their newer FF lens and body lineup says anything, they have gotten significantly worse. The K1 had reliability issues with the meter glitching out and part of the mode dial falling apart internally, and the K1-II forces raw noise reduction for every photo that reduces its low light shadow pushing ability (sony does something similar if you enable shading correction in camera but at least you can turn it off).
The only thing they do that nikon does not is put weather sealing on their cheapest aps-c junk. Instead their cheapest trash has aperture failures. Yes, I know they have IBIS. They don't have a native tilt shift lens and OIS lenses are as effective as pentax's third rate IBIS. K mount can't adapt SHIT either. The autofocus is notoriously slow and a bit inaccurate. For a photographer these are overpriced, oversized cameras with significantly reduced utility unless you already own a mountain of K mount lenses.
So why is it a hipster brand? Because the pentax k-1000 was the default camera for most photography school students so hipsters buy a pentax to feel like they are more of a real artist than just another "camera guy". So they just have to hate other brands (often irrationally) to cope after spending a boatload on a k3-iii and a bunch of mirrorless priced lenses with SLR performance.
If you don't hate yourself get an a7c and weather sealed tamron glass. It's as durable as any pentax, if not more because there is less to fail.
It's a hipster brand. Nothing more. Pentax is borderline out of business and no longer improving. In fact, if their newer FF lens and body lineup says anything, they have gotten significantly worse. The K1 had reliability issues with the meter glitching out and part of the mode dial falling apart internally, and the K1-II forces raw noise reduction for every photo that reduces its low light shadow pushing ability (sony does something similar if you enable shading correction in camera but at least you can turn it off).
The only thing they do that nikon does not is put weather sealing on their cheapest aps-c junk. Instead their cheapest trash has aperture failures. Yes, I know they have IBIS. They don't have a native tilt shift lens and OIS lenses are as effective as pentax's third rate IBIS. K mount can't adapt SHIT either. The autofocus is notoriously slow and a bit inaccurate. For a photographer these are overpriced, oversized cameras with significantly reduced utility unless you already own a mountain of K mount lenses.
So why is it a hipster brand? Because the pentax k-1000 was the default camera for most photography school students so hipsters buy a pentax to feel like they are more of a real artist than just another "camera guy". So they just have to hate other brands (often irrationally) to cope after spending a boatload on a k3-iii and a bunch of mirrorless priced lenses with SLR performance.
If you don't hate yourself get an a7c and weather sealed tamron glass. It's as durable as any pentax, if not more because there is less to fail.
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)13:32:03 No.4387936
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)13:50:24 No.4387937
>>4387909
>tons of button customization
honestly I find it to be a bit limited
maybe they're just better than everyone else but I doubt it
if that were the case then what the fuck is everyone else even doing
>tons of button customization
honestly I find it to be a bit limited
maybe they're just better than everyone else but I doubt it
if that were the case then what the fuck is everyone else even doing
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)14:58:12 No.4387945
>>4387937
>then what the fuck is everyone else even doing
That's what i've been saying for 8 years, K1 still remains the best DSLR and probably will be for a long while
>then what the fuck is everyone else even doing
That's what i've been saying for 8 years, K1 still remains the best DSLR and probably will be for a long while
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)16:39:38 No.4387975
Splash of light
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 72 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:05:28 21:38:31 |
Exposure Time | 1/90 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Creative |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | -1/2 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 48.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)16:42:16 No.4387977
>>4387885
Thanks a lot Anon
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Thanks a lot Anon
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 52 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:06:07 21:53:26 |
Exposure Time | 1.5 sec |
F-Number | f/13.0 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 35.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)20:59:59 No.4388010
What's a good and cheap lens for my K5, Looking for something that zooms to 200mm or there abouts
Anonymous 11/25/24(Mon)21:51:48 No.4388018
>>4387931
As I read up on Pentax camera models and old forums posts, I find that almost every model has quality control issues/ flaws. Not to mention the lenses are inferior to the competition by a noticeable margin. I guess that's why the used market for Pentax cameras/lenses seems more affordable.
Not shitting on Pentax, I'll snag an a K5 sooner or later. They do make some nice jpegs imho.
As I read up on Pentax camera models and old forums posts, I find that almost every model has quality control issues/ flaws. Not to mention the lenses are inferior to the competition by a noticeable margin. I guess that's why the used market for Pentax cameras/lenses seems more affordable.
Not shitting on Pentax, I'll snag an a K5 sooner or later. They do make some nice jpegs imho.
Anonymous 11/26/24(Tue)01:59:02 No.4388063
>>4367112
I'm sure they're great, but Pentax always sounds to me like it's some kind of feminine hygiene product.
I'm sure they're great, but Pentax always sounds to me like it's some kind of feminine hygiene product.
Anonymous 11/26/24(Tue)06:27:20 No.4388082
>>4388063
>Forget quality, i need a cool name in my camera for my pics to be good
I don't know if you are bottom retard or peak artist
>Forget quality, i need a cool name in my camera for my pics to be good
I don't know if you are bottom retard or peak artist
Anonymous 11/26/24(Tue)18:37:29 No.4388207
Anonymous 11/27/24(Wed)20:02:04 No.4388395
SOOC colors are really quite nice
DPreview test chart doesn't do Pentax justice
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
DPreview test chart doesn't do Pentax justice
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co. |
Camera Model | SAMSUNG GX10 |
Camera Software | GX10 Ver 1.30 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2006:01:05 06:15:10 |
Exposure Time | 1/200 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3872 |
Image Height | 2592 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Macro |
Anonymous 11/27/24(Wed)20:07:13 No.4388396
>>4388395
Not a fair comparison since the lighting changed in between shots but here's a shot from my D70 with contrast maxed (also SOOC). Pentax was at default everything for reference.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Not a fair comparison since the lighting changed in between shots but here's a shot from my D70 with contrast maxed (also SOOC). Pentax was at default everything for reference.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | NIKON CORPORATION |
Camera Model | NIKON D70 |
Camera Software | Ver.2.00 |
Maximum Lens Aperture | f/4.4 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Color Filter Array Pattern | 824 |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 105 mm |
Serial Number | -1000216 |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:11:27 04:03:03 |
Exposure Time | 1/125 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Light Source | Unknown |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 70.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 3008 |
Image Height | 2000 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Gain Control | None |
Contrast | Hard |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Unknown |
ISO Speed Used | 200 |
Image Quality | BASIC |
White Balance | AUTO |
Image Sharpening | HIGH |
Focus Mode | AF-S |
Flash Setting | REAR SLOW |
Flash Compensation | 0.0 EV |
ISO Speed Requested | 200 |
Flash Bracket Compensation | 0.0 EV |
AE Bracket Compensation | 0.0 EV |
Tone Compensation | HIGH |
Lens Type | Nikon D Series |
Lens Range | 18.0 - 70.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/4.5 |
Auto Focus | Single Area, Center Selected, Top Focused |
Shooting/Bracketing Mode | Single Frame/Off |
Color Mode | Portrait sRGB |
Lighting Type | NATURAL |
Noise Reduction | OFF |
Camera Actuations | 16575 |
Image Optimization | CUSTOM |
Saturation 2 | NORMAL |
Anonymous 12/02/24(Mon)16:08:47 No.4389413
Sisters, do anyone have a raw of a K50 that can share? I am on the fence about buying one. Yes I want a pink camera but I also want to use it for you know, actual photos.
Anonymous 12/07/24(Sat)06:15:03 No.4390472
gear posting cause I tidied it all up a bit recently
Anonymous 12/07/24(Sat)15:17:56 No.4390605
>>4390472
based
based
Anonymous 12/10/24(Tue)12:02:47 No.4391130
Kind of low contrast scene
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 90 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:12:09 18:53:09 |
Exposure Time | 1/15 sec |
F-Number | f/13.0 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 1 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 60.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 12/10/24(Tue)12:04:05 No.4391132
>>4391130
+3 contrast
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
+3 contrast
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 102 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:12:09 18:57:34 |
Exposure Time | 1/15 sec |
F-Number | f/13.0 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 1/2 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 68.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | High |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 12/10/24(Tue)15:13:39 No.4391156
Bargain bin Quantaray 70-300 seems pretty good
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG |
Camera Model | GX10 |
Camera Software | RawTherapee 5.11 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 450 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 |
Vertical Resolution | 72 |
Image Created | 2024:12:10 12:10:59 |
Exposure Time | 1/200 sec |
F-Number | f/5.6 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 300.00 mm |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 12/10/24(Tue)15:14:47 No.4391157
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG |
Camera Model | GX10 |
Camera Software | RawTherapee 5.11 |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 |
Vertical Resolution | 72 |
Image Created | 2024:12:10 10:55:05 |
Exposure Time | 1/160 sec |
F-Number | f/5.6 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 300.00 mm |
Anonymous 12/11/24(Wed)06:35:41 No.4391265
>>4391156
It's excellent
It's excellent
Anonymous 12/11/24(Wed)12:59:49 No.4391340
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | SAMSUNG |
Camera Model | GX10 |
Camera Software | RawTherapee 5.11 |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 |
Vertical Resolution | 72 |
Image Created | 2024:12:10 11:04:21 |
Exposure Time | 1/200 sec |
F-Number | f/8.0 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 180.00 mm |
Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 12/11/24(Wed)14:52:09 No.4391359
>>4391156
Major underrated lens, has apochromatic optics and honestly if you don't need VR or larger aperture, it's perfect.
Major underrated lens, has apochromatic optics and honestly if you don't need VR or larger aperture, it's perfect.
Anonymous 12/22/24(Sun)16:27:49 No.4394243
Dark forest vibes
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 52 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:09:07 18:36:10 |
Exposure Time | 1/60 sec |
F-Number | f/4.0 |
Exposure Program | Creative |
ISO Speed Rating | 1600 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 35.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 12/22/24(Sun)16:32:23 No.4394244
This one taken with a polarizing filter just to make a slightly longer exposure.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 52 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:09:08 20:17:57 |
Exposure Time | 1/2 sec |
F-Number | f/19.0 |
Exposure Program | Shutter Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 35.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 12/22/24(Sun)20:16:51 No.4394269
>>4394244
pentax moment
pentax moment
Anonymous 12/27/24(Fri)17:19:34 No.4395234
Some test pics taken with the HD Pentax-FA50 F1.4 lens
https://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/2023/05/-hd-pentax-fa-50mmf14-2023.html
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
https://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Camera Software | Capture One 10.2.1 Windows |
Photographer | Osyanpo_K |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Width | 1618 |
Image Height | 1080 |
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)00:33:36 No.4395291
>>4395234
you like it over the older 50mm f1.4?
you like it over the older 50mm f1.4?
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)06:33:51 No.4395334
>>4395291
What do you mean? It's the same lens.
What do you mean? It's the same lens.
Anonymous 01/05/25(Sun)05:21:08 No.4397134
Last night I took a picture of my new pepper mill. The background was a black t-shirt.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 0 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2025:01:04 23:35:16 |
Exposure Time | 3 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 100 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 0.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1152 |
Image Height | 1728 |
Rendering | Custom |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Soft |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Unknown |
Anonymous 01/05/25(Sun)06:27:19 No.4397139
>>4387874
Nikon is amazing for using the same lenses on film and DSLR.
F65, F75, F80, F100, F5 and F6 are all fully compatible with all AF-S lenses, and even support VR.
Nikon is amazing for using the same lenses on film and DSLR.
F65, F75, F80, F100, F5 and F6 are all fully compatible with all AF-S lenses, and even support VR.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)02:10:49 No.4397355
Pentax K-5IIs - SMC DA 50mm 1.8
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-5 II s |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop 21.0 (Windows) |
Photographer | WB_PHOTOGRAPHIC |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 75 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Width | 3013 |
Image Height | 4549 |
Number of Bits Per Component | 8, 8, 8 |
Pixel Composition | RGB |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 238 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 238 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:12:14 02:03:59 |
Exposure Time | 1/400 sec |
F-Number | f/2.2 |
Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
ISO Speed Rating | 400 |
Lens Aperture | f/2.2 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Spot |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 50.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 2023 |
Image Height | 3055 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)04:46:07 No.4397381
>>4397355
What a strange picture.
What a strange picture.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)05:57:13 No.4397394
Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)01:34:37 No.4397629
https://www.ebay.com/itm/167221821283
rate the new e-waste, i paid $304 + $12 shipping + $28 sales tax = $344. ricoh refurb has the same setup for $529 + $46 sales tax or $470 body only. i feel like i overpaid just a little. hoping its okay and not clapped. it does have a little bit of wear on the ears for the neckstrap.
blogpost:
i kinda always wanted a actual DSLR because i love the slap of the mirrors when you hit the shutter. its just a cool sound that really makes you feel like you're taking a photo. even though the autofocus on these things suck especially for what i mostly take photos of (aircraft + cars) i think for what i paid its worth it as a toy. i fell in love with the kf when i was first getting into photography and went to a store to play with cameras. it just felt cool. i ended up buying a nikon z50 and used it for 4 months before i sold it for what i paid for it.
currently im shooting with a sony zv1 (point and shoot w/1in sensor and 24-70mm lens) which im probably not gonna get rid of, only because i can stick it in a pocket.
other considerations:
snoy a6000 + 16-50 and 55-210 kit lenses ($400, locally, but then all my stuff would be sony and it feels too similar to what i want in the future)
canon 5d mark 3 for $400 (but i already wanna pick up a a7iv/a7r3 + 50-300mm or 28-200 tamron in the future after my tax return)
what lenses should i pick up? i definitely want a 300mm zoom lens with AF.
rate the new e-waste, i paid $304 + $12 shipping + $28 sales tax = $344. ricoh refurb has the same setup for $529 + $46 sales tax or $470 body only. i feel like i overpaid just a little. hoping its okay and not clapped. it does have a little bit of wear on the ears for the neckstrap.
blogpost:
i kinda always wanted a actual DSLR because i love the slap of the mirrors when you hit the shutter. its just a cool sound that really makes you feel like you're taking a photo. even though the autofocus on these things suck especially for what i mostly take photos of (aircraft + cars) i think for what i paid its worth it as a toy. i fell in love with the kf when i was first getting into photography and went to a store to play with cameras. it just felt cool. i ended up buying a nikon z50 and used it for 4 months before i sold it for what i paid for it.
currently im shooting with a sony zv1 (point and shoot w/1in sensor and 24-70mm lens) which im probably not gonna get rid of, only because i can stick it in a pocket.
other considerations:
snoy a6000 + 16-50 and 55-210 kit lenses ($400, locally, but then all my stuff would be sony and it feels too similar to what i want in the future)
canon 5d mark 3 for $400 (but i already wanna pick up a a7iv/a7r3 + 50-300mm or 28-200 tamron in the future after my tax return)
what lenses should i pick up? i definitely want a 300mm zoom lens with AF.
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)16:09:26 No.4397946
Frost
>>4397629
Sometimes I wish I had the 18-55 lens. It's very useful
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>4397629
Sometimes I wish I had the 18-55 lens. It's very useful
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 72 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:12:09 19:18:57 |
Exposure Time | 1/90 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Creative |
ISO Speed Rating | 200 |
Exposure Bias | 1 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 48.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 01/09/25(Thu)10:53:10 No.4398132
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 01/09/25(Thu)10:56:12 No.4398133
Pentax K-5IIs & Super-Takumar 150mm F4
F4 1/1600 @ 1600 CIF
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
F4 1/1600 @ 1600 CIF
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Photographer | WB_PHOTOGRAPHY |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 01/09/25(Thu)11:04:01 No.4398135
Penta K-5IIs - Super Takumar 150mm F4 - 5 Frame Focus Stack - 1/125 @ iso 250
Anonymous 01/10/25(Fri)13:44:33 No.4398438
First pic out of that $340 KF, turns out it has 3120 shutter counts. Actually looks pretty damn good for SOOC jpeg. I just resized it so its not a 12mb file. Camera itself was filthy like someone didn't wash their hands after eating
Already ricing it out. Spent $20 on a used charger + 3 batteries, $10 on a shoulder strap, $75 on a 55-300mm f4-5.8 Pentax SMC DAL Lens, $32 on a Quantaray/Sigma 28-90mm f3.5-5.6 Lens, and $20 on a Promaster (Tamron 278D) 80-210mm f4.5-5.6
Last 2 Lenses are SLR lenses from the late 90s
If I really like it I might go pick up the 55-300mm PLM lens, but I'll see how far I go with the current lenses I bought. Next lens will be a $50 50mm f1.8 Pentax DA Prime.
Pentax lens selection SUCKS imo, you gotta wade through lots of trash to find gems.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Already ricing it out. Spent $20 on a used charger + 3 batteries, $10 on a shoulder strap, $75 on a 55-300mm f4-5.8 Pentax SMC DAL Lens, $32 on a Quantaray/Sigma 28-90mm f3.5-5.6 Lens, and $20 on a Promaster (Tamron 278D) 80-210mm f4.5-5.6
Last 2 Lenses are SLR lenses from the late 90s
If I really like it I might go pick up the 55-300mm PLM lens, but I'll see how far I go with the current lenses I bought. Next lens will be a $50 50mm f1.8 Pentax DA Prime.
Pentax lens selection SUCKS imo, you gotta wade through lots of trash to find gems.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX KF |
Camera Software | PENTAX KF Ver. 1.00 |
Photographer | TERRANCE B NASH |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 57 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2022:11:03 12:18:45 |
Exposure Time | 1/15 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Action |
ISO Speed Rating | 3200 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 37.50 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 6000 |
Image Height | 4000 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Close View |
Anonymous 01/10/25(Fri)14:15:56 No.4398441
>>4398438
Chonky boi. Wish I had as clean output at 3200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Chonky boi. Wish I had as clean output at 3200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2025:01:09 23:01:15 |
Exposure Time | 1/20 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 3200 |
Exposure Bias | 1.5 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Soft |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Unknown |
Anonymous 01/10/25(Fri)19:01:25 No.4398494
>>4398438
There's been quite a few updates to the KF firmware. It's on 1.32 now.
https://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/support/digital/kf.html
There's been quite a few updates to the KF firmware. It's on 1.32 now.
https://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/eng
Anonymous 01/10/25(Fri)23:49:52 No.4398545
>>4398494
I just updated it, do KFs have aperture block failure? This one was built Nov 2022.
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/193-pentax-k-70-kf/402049-how-detect-aperture-block-failure-stuck-solenoid-pentax-k-70-a.html
The pictures stay black if its in manual mode and I'm trying to take pics wide open/wide closed with the same shutter/iso.
Av mode they look the same (but it's adjusting the shutter to compensate). And the aperture is definitely changing both with the OVF and in live view if I set it to auto or AV mode (it'll change the aperture size when I hit the shutter button, not as I'm setting aperture in the settings)
I think I'm just overthinking it and I'll keep using it. Its not under or over exposing pictures and I do 90% of my shooting in auto for most cameras.
I just updated it, do KFs have aperture block failure? This one was built Nov 2022.
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums
The pictures stay black if its in manual mode and I'm trying to take pics wide open/wide closed with the same shutter/iso.
Av mode they look the same (but it's adjusting the shutter to compensate). And the aperture is definitely changing both with the OVF and in live view if I set it to auto or AV mode (it'll change the aperture size when I hit the shutter button, not as I'm setting aperture in the settings)
I think I'm just overthinking it and I'll keep using it. Its not under or over exposing pictures and I do 90% of my shooting in auto for most cameras.
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)01:01:24 No.4398555
>>4398545
As far as I know, the KF is completely unaffected and the K70 has been unaffected after a certain manufacturing date. Maybe check if your EV compensation is all the way negative for the manual mode, but I don't know. It seems like it could be a setting issue somewhere
As far as I know, the KF is completely unaffected and the K70 has been unaffected after a certain manufacturing date. Maybe check if your EV compensation is all the way negative for the manual mode, but I don't know. It seems like it could be a setting issue somewhere
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)03:06:23 No.4398563
>>4398555
Yeah I don't know, the camera is compensating all the way negative on the EV since I have auto exposure set.
I think I'm just gonna run it and worry about it when it actually starts giving me blacked out photos. If it dies it dies and I upgrade to a K3 or K3II (they actually cost the same exact as the KF at $400~ or so...which makes me wonder why I even bought one). I do like how it feels in hand and the colors/IQ on the kit lens. I'm so far at $520 spent.
I think my biggest problem with this camera ecosystem is the lens availability. Canon has better DSLR lenses, Nikon has better DSLR bodies. I think your average Pentaxian is someone with a bunch of K mount film lenses who refuses to upgrade or someone who bought a K5/K30/K50 10-15 years ago when they were still pretty competitive. Even the WR/build claims are eh when the low end ones are prone to aperture block issues and the CanoNikons are proven worldwide at this point.
I might try a Sony Alpha DSLR next (a390 for the 14mp CCD sensor), I actually think Sony might have better lenses.
Yeah I don't know, the camera is compensating all the way negative on the EV since I have auto exposure set.
I think I'm just gonna run it and worry about it when it actually starts giving me blacked out photos. If it dies it dies and I upgrade to a K3 or K3II (they actually cost the same exact as the KF at $400~ or so...which makes me wonder why I even bought one). I do like how it feels in hand and the colors/IQ on the kit lens. I'm so far at $520 spent.
I think my biggest problem with this camera ecosystem is the lens availability. Canon has better DSLR lenses, Nikon has better DSLR bodies. I think your average Pentaxian is someone with a bunch of K mount film lenses who refuses to upgrade or someone who bought a K5/K30/K50 10-15 years ago when they were still pretty competitive. Even the WR/build claims are eh when the low end ones are prone to aperture block issues and the CanoNikons are proven worldwide at this point.
I might try a Sony Alpha DSLR next (a390 for the 14mp CCD sensor), I actually think Sony might have better lenses.
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)09:36:31 No.4398597
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)10:21:41 No.4398607
>>4398563
>Yeah I don't know, the camera is compensating all the way negative on the EV since I have auto exposure set.
The M (or any) mode won't apply adjustments to the EV compensation. This is the page from the manual. Adjust it to 0 if it's not to start figuring out what's going wrong.
Just in case we're talking about different exposure things, you have to set ISO in M mode. So your ISO could be too low.
This seems fixable, but it's hard to tell exactly why the M is giving black pictures without being there.
I don't know about any of those zoom lenses, but the 50 f1.8 can put out some really good, sharp pictures.
>Yeah I don't know, the camera is compensating all the way negative on the EV since I have auto exposure set.
The M (or any) mode won't apply adjustments to the EV compensation. This is the page from the manual. Adjust it to 0 if it's not to start figuring out what's going wrong.
Just in case we're talking about different exposure things, you have to set ISO in M mode. So your ISO could be too low.
This seems fixable, but it's hard to tell exactly why the M is giving black pictures without being there.
I don't know about any of those zoom lenses, but the 50 f1.8 can put out some really good, sharp pictures.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)18:02:36 No.4399214
>>4380153
K5>K7
Unironically the K7 has weird stuff wrong with its sensor. The K5 is an identical camera with the issue "fixed"
its hard to explain but its apparent once you get a K5.
K5>K7
Unironically the K7 has weird stuff wrong with its sensor. The K5 is an identical camera with the issue "fixed"
its hard to explain but its apparent once you get a K5.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)21:11:14 No.4399245
Is this worth buying as baby's first film camera? The lens goes for $40-50 on its own. The camera body is a SFX SF1.
I have a few other k mount lenses (Pentax 55-300mm and 18-55mm SMC DA-L, Quantaray/Sigma 28-90mm, Promaster/Tamron 80-200mm).
I wanna try to shoot film.
I have a few other k mount lenses (Pentax 55-300mm and 18-55mm SMC DA-L, Quantaray/Sigma 28-90mm, Promaster/Tamron 80-200mm).
I wanna try to shoot film.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)21:30:26 No.4399247
>>4399245
I forgot, its on eBay for $60 atm, probably $70 after shipping.
I don't really need it but kinda wanted the strap anyways. Supposedly that Tamron Lens is "okay" on DSLRs, kinda soft but not a horror show (it looks like its one of the later production ones made in the late 00s).
>>4398607
I think its just me since I'm not moving the ISO or shutter speed. I already ran 100+ photos through it, no real issues unless I intentionally did something. almost all in auto.
I forgot, its on eBay for $60 atm, probably $70 after shipping.
I don't really need it but kinda wanted the strap anyways. Supposedly that Tamron Lens is "okay" on DSLRs, kinda soft but not a horror show (it looks like its one of the later production ones made in the late 00s).
>>4398607
I think its just me since I'm not moving the ISO or shutter speed. I already ran 100+ photos through it, no real issues unless I intentionally did something. almost all in auto.
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)14:19:51 No.4399400
>>4399214
>K5>K7
Nice to know I have an updoot path
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>K5>K7
Nice to know I have an updoot path
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | RawTherapee 5.9 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Width | 1800 |
Image Height | 1199 |
Compression Scheme | Uncompressed |
Pixel Composition | RGB |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Data Arrangement | Chunky Format |
Image Created | 2025:01:08 18:47:54 |
Exposure Time | 1/30 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 800 |
Exposure Bias | 1 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Soft |
Subject Distance Range | Unknown |
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)14:42:10 No.4399402
I think the cmos sensor in K-7 was manufactured by Scamsung. It doesn't have much highlight detail.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | PENTAX |
Camera Model | PENTAX K-7 |
Camera Software | K-7 Ver 1.13 |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 82 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 300 dpi |
Image Created | 2025:01:09 23:07:06 |
Exposure Time | 1/45 sec |
F-Number | f/0.0 |
Exposure Program | Manual |
ISO Speed Rating | 560 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Center Weighted Average |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 55.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 1728 |
Image Height | 1152 |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Manual |
White Balance | Manual |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Contrast | Soft |
Saturation | Low |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject Distance Range | Unknown |
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)19:47:36 No.4399529
Anonymous 01/17/25(Fri)07:09:40 No.4400004
Should I get a 35mm 2.4 or 50mm 1.8 DA lens? MPB has them cheap ($64 and $50), going on a crop sensor for general walk around photos.
Anonymous 01/17/25(Fri)15:20:04 No.4400058
Had a model for my mid-day incel walk to get lunch
I bought this strap here and its a little short, its great around the neck
No aircraft pics this week, I'm on nights for a while + no OT
Lens is new...its a Promaster 70-300mm LD 58mm Filter Size (Sigma Rebrand) I picked up off eBay for $30 by accident. Actually not a bad lens but I had to remove a lot of the purple fringing in post using LR.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
I bought this strap here and its a little short, its great around the neck
No aircraft pics this week, I'm on nights for a while + no OT
Lens is new...its a Promaster 70-300mm LD 58mm Filter Size (Sigma Rebrand) I picked up off eBay for $30 by accident. Actually not a bad lens but I had to remove a lot of the purple fringing in post using LR.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX KF |
Camera Software | Adobe Lightroom 8.1 (Macintosh) |
Photographer | ShoopraLazor |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 255 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 240 dpi |
Image Created | 2025:01:17 15:17:07 |
Exposure Time | 1/160 sec |
F-Number | f/4.5 |
Exposure Program | Landscape Mode |
ISO Speed Rating | 3200 |
Lens Aperture | f/4.5 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 170.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Landscape |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 01/17/25(Fri)15:28:51 No.4400059
>>4400058
>>4400054 for the strap. Neoprene has like a rubber backing that wont let it slide around easily if you tuck it under your arm and it needs to be 2in longer. Works great as a neck strap.
Actually really like how the pics come out on this KF. For a $350 camera its pretty damn good. I'm waiting on a 28-90mm Quantaray + 55-300mm DA-L Pentax + 35mm f2.4 DA Prime to arrive next. I wasn't taking more pics earlier because I just got a charger for it (batteries went flat) and I freaked out after I thought I killed it using a 90s flash on it (Sunpak 433D)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>4400054 for the strap. Neoprene has like a rubber backing that wont let it slide around easily if you tuck it under your arm and it needs to be 2in longer. Works great as a neck strap.
Actually really like how the pics come out on this KF. For a $350 camera its pretty damn good. I'm waiting on a 28-90mm Quantaray + 55-300mm DA-L Pentax + 35mm f2.4 DA Prime to arrive next. I wasn't taking more pics earlier because I just got a charger for it (batteries went flat) and I freaked out after I thought I killed it using a 90s flash on it (Sunpak 433D)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX KF |
Camera Software | Adobe Lightroom 8.1 (Macintosh) |
Photographer | ShoopraLazor |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 450 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 240 dpi |
Image Created | 2025:01:17 15:26:28 |
Exposure Time | 1/125 sec |
F-Number | f/5.6 |
Exposure Program | Landscape Mode |
ISO Speed Rating | 3200 |
Lens Aperture | f/5.6 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 300.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Landscape |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |
Anonymous 01/17/25(Fri)16:30:13 No.4400082
>>4400059
I forgot I also have a 18-55 Kit Lens and Rokinon 80-210 manual lens.
I'm probably like $200 all together in lenses and accessories.
This camera really likes high ISOs, like 1600-3200 if I leave it on auto.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
I forgot I also have a 18-55 Kit Lens and Rokinon 80-210 manual lens.
I'm probably like $200 all together in lenses and accessories.
This camera really likes high ISOs, like 1600-3200 if I leave it on auto.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Equipment Make | RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. |
Camera Model | PENTAX KF |
Camera Software | Adobe Lightroom 8.1 (Macintosh) |
Photographer | ShoopraLazor |
Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 105 mm |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 240 dpi |
Image Created | 2025:01:17 16:18:45 |
Exposure Time | 1/200 sec |
F-Number | f/9.0 |
Exposure Program | Landscape Mode |
ISO Speed Rating | 3200 |
Lens Aperture | f/9.0 |
Exposure Bias | 0 EV |
Metering Mode | Pattern |
Flash | No Flash, Compulsory |
Focal Length | 70.00 mm |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Rendering | Normal |
Exposure Mode | Auto |
White Balance | Auto |
Scene Capture Type | Landscape |
Contrast | Hard |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Hard |
Subject Distance Range | Distant View |