First look at the Walking with Dinosaurs remake
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:42:15 | 122 comments | 33 images
Looks soulless. As expected, since trannies are involved but not the creators of the original
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:42:32 No.208087507
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:43:38 No.208087528
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:44:12 No.208087545
both of these shots look fine. Granted even prehistoric planet used puppets for a couple lose up shots so I hope this is willing to use them too like the original
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:45:37 No.208087572
>>208087528
this shot not so much, only because of the whole point of a remake would be better cgi. But we'll see how its presented
this shot not so much, only because of the whole point of a remake would be better cgi. But we'll see how its presented
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:46:23 No.208087583
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:46:40 No.208087595
>>208087572
The issue is that it looks soulless. WWD even if the dated CGI still looks beautiful and awe-inspiring.
This just looks like Dinosaur revolution or March of the Dinosaurs again
The issue is that it looks soulless. WWD even if the dated CGI still looks beautiful and awe-inspiring.
This just looks like Dinosaur revolution or March of the Dinosaurs again
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:49:04 No.208087638
>>208087583
Why can feather niggers still not help themselves even though it’s been disproven with most large dinosaurs? It’s such a Reddit vibe from these fucking people and they just won’t admit they were wrong
Why can feather niggers still not help themselves even though it’s been disproven with most large dinosaurs? It’s such a Reddit vibe from these fucking people and they just won’t admit they were wrong
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:50:19 No.208087674
>>208087638
>even though it’s been disproven with most large dinosaurs?
Albertosaurus was in the size range and clade for which we have direct evidence of feathered dinosaurs
>even though it’s been disproven with most large dinosaurs?
Albertosaurus was in the size range and clade for which we have direct evidence of feathered dinosaurs
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:51:17 No.208087701
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:51:59 No.208087719
>>208087701
They're Albertosaurs
They're Albertosaurs
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:52:12 No.208087726
>>208087701
zoomer asians, they look like that
zoomer asians, they look like that
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:53:10 No.208087749
>>208087638
Elon Musk should start tweeting about how he thinks it's cool that dinosaurs had feathers. Guaranteed to change the narrative so no one ever thought dinos had feathers.
Elon Musk should start tweeting about how he thinks it's cool that dinosaurs had feathers. Guaranteed to change the narrative so no one ever thought dinos had feathers.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:56:07 No.208087820
>>208087719
oh it says they both are in the article, i'm stupid
oh it says they both are in the article, i'm stupid
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:05:39 No.208088045
>>208087499
what do you mean, are they remaking the original series with the same stories, dinosaurs and everything?
what do you mean, are they remaking the original series with the same stories, dinosaurs and everything?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:06:38 No.208088066
>>208088045
No lmao, it's basically a remake of Dinosaur Revolution with different formations/animals and with Walking with Dinosaurs title slapped on for brownie points
No lmao, it's basically a remake of Dinosaur Revolution with different formations/animals and with Walking with Dinosaurs title slapped on for brownie points
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:07:08 No.208088076
>>208088066
okay that's good. they shouldn't touch the original
okay that's good. they shouldn't touch the original
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:08:41 No.208088118
Sorry, I only watch kino
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:14:33 No.208088259
>no LGBTQ+ social messages
where is my representation?
Fuck this show. #ElonNotMyPresident
where is my representation?
Fuck this show. #ElonNotMyPresident
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:16:06 No.208088299
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:16:38 No.208088316
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:25:06 No.208088509
>>208088118
Pic unrelated.
Pic unrelated.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:26:13 No.208088533
>>208088316
oh my science!
oh my science!
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:27:12 No.208088555
>>208088316
Imagine obsessively following TV shows to ree at the people involved.
The only degenerates involved in this show are the ones who think dinosaurs have feathers.
>show me a pic of this show with dino-feathers
if not, its all cool AFAIC
Imagine obsessively following TV shows to ree at the people involved.
The only degenerates involved in this show are the ones who think dinosaurs have feathers.
>show me a pic of this show with dino-feathers
if not, its all cool AFAIC
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:28:32 No.208088587
>>208088555
imagine being so ignorant you're still thinking feathers in dinosaurs are some kind of media psyop in the year 2000 + 25
imagine being so ignorant you're still thinking feathers in dinosaurs are some kind of media psyop in the year 2000 + 25
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:29:39 No.208088613
>>208088587
imagine replying to some guy who is busy gooning to tranny dinosaur show producers
imagine replying to some guy who is busy gooning to tranny dinosaur show producers
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:31:24 No.208088657
>>208087499
why do they keep doing this
and why do people keep paying money to see it? do people really wanna see a story where no character can emote cause of muh realism?
just watch the original
why do they keep doing this
and why do people keep paying money to see it? do people really wanna see a story where no character can emote cause of muh realism?
just watch the original
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:33:09 No.208088691
>>208088657
>do people really wanna see a story where no character can emote cause of muh realism?
I didn't know big Al could dab
>do people really wanna see a story where no character can emote cause of muh realism?
I didn't know big Al could dab
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:33:12 No.208088692
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:36:55 No.208088784
>>208088657
A remake of Dinosaur would be pretty sweet.
A remake of Dinosaur would be pretty sweet.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:39:01 No.208088840
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:41:30 No.208088904
>>208087499
>>208087528
>still trying to put feathers on tyrannosaurs in 2025
Let it go, featherfags. You lost.
>b-but maybe it had peach fuzz!
Shut the fuck up.
>>208087528
>still trying to put feathers on tyrannosaurs in 2025
Let it go, featherfags. You lost.
>b-but maybe it had peach fuzz!
Shut the fuck up.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:43:16 No.208088953
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:44:00 No.208088967
>>208087499
I don't doubt at all that they will make "minorities" and homosexual dinosaurs taking the spotlight and "white" and heterosexual ones the bad ones
I don't doubt at all that they will make "minorities" and homosexual dinosaurs taking the spotlight and "white" and heterosexual ones the bad ones
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:44:45 No.208088990
>>208087499
Some of the dinosaurs will be transgender and/or pansexual and the brontasaurus will be voiced by a black man
Some of the dinosaurs will be transgender and/or pansexual and the brontasaurus will be voiced by a black man
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:49:34 No.208089127
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:49:43 No.208089132
>>208087499
>feathers on T. rex
They just can't stop with the anti-scientific bullshit these days, can they? These cunts are literally going to kill any credibility in science by the end of this decade. We're nearly there already.
>feathers on T. rex
They just can't stop with the anti-scientific bullshit these days, can they? These cunts are literally going to kill any credibility in science by the end of this decade. We're nearly there already.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:51:12 No.208089164
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:52:29 No.208089186
>>208089132
They already killed any credibility they had by blindly believing the feather boom that came out of China.
They already killed any credibility they had by blindly believing the feather boom that came out of China.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:52:29 No.208089187
>>208087583
It's been proven most HAD feathers, you fucking retard, just because your outdated pictures book doesn't have them doesn't mean it's true
It's been proven most HAD feathers, you fucking retard, just because your outdated pictures book doesn't have them doesn't mean it's true
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:54:10 No.208089221
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:54:24 No.208089224
>>208089187
>most HAD feathers
The feather narrative is that SOME smaller ones had feathers, so you're wrong.
Back to furry Twitter with you, featherfag.
>most HAD feathers
The feather narrative is that SOME smaller ones had feathers, so you're wrong.
Back to furry Twitter with you, featherfag.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:56:39 No.208089276
>>208088555
how the fuck did you get a photo of me delete this now asshole
how the fuck did you get a photo of me delete this now asshole
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:00:11 No.208089347
>>208089187
Naw its that a lot of a smaller therapods developed feathers, i dont think any sauropod is considered to have feathers
Naw its that a lot of a smaller therapods developed feathers, i dont think any sauropod is considered to have feathers
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:00:36 No.208089361
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:02:14 No.208089406
>>208088118
Oh no no no
Oh no no no
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:02:34 No.208089419
>>208089361
By very consistently and ostentatiously lying about them.
By very consistently and ostentatiously lying about them.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:04:15 No.208089462
>>208089406
Literally me
Literally me
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:04:41 No.208089467
>>208089406
This is less believable than Jurassic Park.
This is less believable than Jurassic Park.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:06:48 No.208089512
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:07:06 No.208089521
>>208089406
As far as display goes, wouldn't it make more sense for the horns to be used in mating rituals?
As far as display goes, wouldn't it make more sense for the horns to be used in mating rituals?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:08:28 No.208089547
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:09:55 No.208089576
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:12:41 No.208089628
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:12:47 No.208089630
>>208089576
Yes, she's a millenial
Yes, she's a millenial
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:16:15 No.208089692
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:16:20 No.208089693
>>208087528
WTF they all share the same texture? SAAR
WTF they all share the same texture? SAAR
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:16:46 No.208089708
>>208088316
Least gay featherfag.
Least gay featherfag.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:17:22 No.208089715
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:19:48 No.208089753
>>208088555
>ask for proof of something
>get shown the proof
>"you actually knew that? Lol you fucking loser"
>ask for proof of something
>get shown the proof
>"you actually knew that? Lol you fucking loser"
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:20:57 No.208089766
>>208089406
Humiliation ritual.
Humiliation ritual.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:22:07 No.208089792
>I believe in dinosaurs
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:22:45 No.208089800
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:23:22 No.208089811
>>208088316
who invited this guy?
who invited this guy?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:25:50 No.208089855
>>208089800
Comfy at home in Jurassic World Evolution.
Comfy at home in Jurassic World Evolution.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:32:34 No.208090000
>>208089855
shittest film ever im watching fallen kingdom atm and it fucking blows
shittest film ever im watching fallen kingdom atm and it fucking blows
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:33:17 No.208090019
>>208090000
Dominion is somehow worse
Dominion is somehow worse
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:40:12 No.208090172
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:42:26 No.208090213
>>208089406
>excellent cgi
>funny little memorable dance
>no feathershit
>relatable incel character
And I'm supposed to hate this scene why?
>excellent cgi
>funny little memorable dance
>no feathershit
>relatable incel character
And I'm supposed to hate this scene why?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:43:36 No.208090241
>>208090213
We don't expect retards to hate it. You're special, after all.
We don't expect retards to hate it. You're special, after all.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:46:12 No.208090298
>>208090241
Not an argument, i accept your concession
Not an argument, i accept your concession
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:46:59 No.208090314
>>208090298
Haha, we love our downies don't we, folks?
Haha, we love our downies don't we, folks?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:48:54 No.208090348
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:49:52 No.208090370
>>208087499
I thought this was Walking Dead with Dinosaurs thread and am disappointed.
I thought this was Walking Dead with Dinosaurs thread and am disappointed.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:51:51 No.208090422
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:03:20 No.208090678
>>208090422
Wild how much more realistic this looks and moves than the actual CGI.
That thigh jiggle is kino.
Wild how much more realistic this looks and moves than the actual CGI.
That thigh jiggle is kino.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:04:17 No.208090697
>still falling for shrink-wrapping
Dinosaurs looked nothing like how we imagine them
Dinosaurs looked nothing like how we imagine them
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:06:02 No.208090729
>>208090697
Shut up, psued.
Shut up, psued.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:08:03 No.208090773
>>208090422
This still looks better than 90% of this shit made today.
This still looks better than 90% of this shit made today.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:09:04 No.208090801
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:09:40 No.208090813
>>208088555
>UMMM OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE NO TRANNIES MEDS SCHIZO
...
>YEAH WELL WHY DO YOU EVEN KNOW THAT????
ack yourself
>UMMM OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE NO TRANNIES MEDS SCHIZO
...
>YEAH WELL WHY DO YOU EVEN KNOW THAT????
ack yourself
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:09:51 No.208090819
>>208090801
kek
kek
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:16:13 No.208090969
>>208090801
paleoart used to be based
paleoart used to be based
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:17:36 No.208090999
>>208090801
Sadly accurate
Sadly accurate
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:18:04 No.208091005
>>208090969
Indeed
Indeed
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:18:34 No.208091013
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:19:35 No.208091039
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:19:40 No.208091042
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:19:57 No.208091047
>>208087507
Why did triggers have BEAKS?
Why did triggers have BEAKS?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:20:37 No.208091062
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:27:08 No.208091191
Prehistoric Planet was better, at least it had dinofus.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:48:34 No.208091619
>>208091013
The authors lied and exaggerated to make their non-point, which was basically "We can do whatever we want! You don't know we're wrong!". Even if you shrinkwrapped a rhino, it wouldn't look the way they made it look, for example. All Yesterdays and its consequences have been an absolute fucking catastrophe for paleontology.
The authors lied and exaggerated to make their non-point, which was basically "We can do whatever we want! You don't know we're wrong!". Even if you shrinkwrapped a rhino, it wouldn't look the way they made it look, for example. All Yesterdays and its consequences have been an absolute fucking catastrophe for paleontology.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:52:47 No.208091711
>>208087528
why do they have fucking zoomer haircuts?
why do they have fucking zoomer haircuts?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:54:27 No.208091745
>>208089406
Anyone got the webm of the trans dino from this show?
Anyone got the webm of the trans dino from this show?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:56:33 No.208091785
>>208091191
pure demoralization
pure demoralization
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:00:34 No.208091846
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:01:31 No.208091863
>>208090697
braindead piece of shit idiot
braindead piece of shit idiot
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:06:47 No.208091974
>>208090801
lost
lost
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:08:32 No.208092007
>>208091863
>Dinosaurs looked exactly like they were portrayed in the media when I was a kid!!!!
Nope. No evidence for that.
>Dinosaurs looked exactly like they were portrayed in the media when I was a kid!!!!
Nope. No evidence for that.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:09:51 No.208092028
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:10:56 No.208092054
Is this accurate?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:11:40 No.208092063
>>208092028
Correct. We have no idea what dinosaurs looked like.
Correct. We have no idea what dinosaurs looked like.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:13:55 No.208092107
>>208092063
Indeed. Might as well say Jurassic Park's are the real deal at this point.
Indeed. Might as well say Jurassic Park's are the real deal at this point.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:16:30 No.208092157
>>208092107
For all we know they may have been furry like cats
For all we know they may have been furry like cats
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:18:35 No.208092194
>>208092157
They would be cat-shaped if that were true.
They would be cat-shaped if that were true.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:31:38 No.208092395
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:33:13 No.208092422
>>208092395
Amen, brother.
Amen, brother.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:43:59 No.208092608
I don't know, still kinda scary in their own way
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbCQxBTcyRk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbC
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:45:03 No.208092627
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:50:26 No.208092742
>>208092627
so no more i got you senpai
so no more i got you senpai
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:51:05 No.208092755
>>208092742
Orca aren't scary though, they're frens.
Orca aren't scary though, they're frens.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:52:20 No.208092777
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:53:58 No.208092810
>>208087638
My cousin is bald, does it suddenly mean that humans dont actually have hair? No, the big dinos dont have feathers simply because feathers would be too much heat for their bodies, while the small dinos actually have feathers to deal with the cold and keep themselves warm
My cousin is bald, does it suddenly mean that humans dont actually have hair? No, the big dinos dont have feathers simply because feathers would be too much heat for their bodies, while the small dinos actually have feathers to deal with the cold and keep themselves warm
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:58:23 No.208092885
>dinosaur thread on /tv/
>seething relentless autism in 90% of the posts
Everything seems in order here
Gotta respect the consistency of you fags, it's very reliable
>seething relentless autism in 90% of the posts
Everything seems in order here
Gotta respect the consistency of you fags, it's very reliable
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:58:56 No.208092896
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)20:00:35 No.208092938
>>208092007
Bot post.
Bot post.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)20:03:03 No.208092979
>>208089406
It’s funny. Why are you whining about this?
It’s funny. Why are you whining about this?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)20:04:42 No.208093007
>>208092979
I know it makes retards laugh but please, the adults are talking here.
I know it makes retards laugh but please, the adults are talking here.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)20:35:58 No.208093596
>>208089406
i'm not against the idea of dinosaurs having some kind of colorization for mating but this seems like a stretch. The T-rex version displaying their under part of their head seems more plausible. Shit even the trap pterosaur still has more precedence in nature.
i'm not against the idea of dinosaurs having some kind of colorization for mating but this seems like a stretch. The T-rex version displaying their under part of their head seems more plausible. Shit even the trap pterosaur still has more precedence in nature.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)21:07:30 No.208094232
>>208092885
i don't respect the consistency of these shitty modern dinosaur "documentaries"
i don't respect the consistency of these shitty modern dinosaur "documentaries"
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)21:12:50 No.208094339
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)21:15:25 No.208094395
>>208092810
Feathers aren't hair, nimrod.
Feathers aren't hair, nimrod.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)21:22:45 No.208094562
>not a feather in sight
Yep, it's dino kino time.
Yep, it's dino kino time.