My god
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)14:41:58 | 7 comments
This is a HUMAN
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:16:33 No.16560335
>>16560296
I read it
I read it
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:45:29 No.16560435
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:10:06 No.16560524
>>16560296
The AI is trained on human data.
The humans are retarded consumers whose medium of conversation are bumpersticker slogans and cultural references.
The AI is learning to think in terms of memes.
It cannot handle slightly novel instantiations and will round novelty to the nearest archetype meme.
These things are just high tech bullshitters.
The AI is trained on human data.
The humans are retarded consumers whose medium of conversation are bumpersticker slogans and cultural references.
The AI is learning to think in terms of memes.
It cannot handle slightly novel instantiations and will round novelty to the nearest archetype meme.
These things are just high tech bullshitters.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:16:49 No.16560605
>>16560435
>AI with internal monologue
You just know that the AI was moving its lips and hands during those eight long seconds.
I am convinced that this thing has sperg level intelligence.
>AI with internal monologue
You just know that the AI was moving its lips and hands during those eight long seconds.
I am convinced that this thing has sperg level intelligence.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:42:34 No.16560635
>>16560524
you're trained on human data too dumbass
There is no reason to think that humans aren't doing roughly same thing and that human "ingenuity" isn't just randomness combined with luck
you're trained on human data too dumbass
There is no reason to think that humans aren't doing roughly same thing and that human "ingenuity" isn't just randomness combined with luck
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:45:41 No.16560637
>>16560435
Maybe I'm an NPC but my internal monologue when answering that question is.
>"goat and man" weird wording
>"large single boat" weird wording
>need to cross river
>reread looking for conditions
>no conditions
>they take the boat
Maybe I'm an NPC but my internal monologue when answering that question is.
>"goat and man" weird wording
>"large single boat" weird wording
>need to cross river
>reread looking for conditions
>no conditions
>they take the boat
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)21:32:17 No.16560745
>>16560635
>you're trained on human data too dumbass
The human/nonhumanness isn't the point.
It is that the training data is a medium of "conversation" not the medium of "thought"
Nobody is autistically logical when they speak for the sake of brevity.
Much is left implied and unsaid.
We usually only transmit "finished results" with language and leave out the derivation/synthesis that happened in thought.
>There is no reason to think that humans aren't doing roughly same thing and that human "ingenuity" isn't just randomness combined with luck
Clearly you have a liberal definition of "same"
Also it is kinda a self-report that you see "ingenuity" that way.
The patterns behind "ingenuity" are found only by those who hypothesize their existence.
If you believe it is randomness/luck, then I can safely say you haven't ever found and never will find them.
>you're trained on human data too dumbass
The human/nonhumanness isn't the point.
It is that the training data is a medium of "conversation" not the medium of "thought"
Nobody is autistically logical when they speak for the sake of brevity.
Much is left implied and unsaid.
We usually only transmit "finished results" with language and leave out the derivation/synthesis that happened in thought.
>There is no reason to think that humans aren't doing roughly same thing and that human "ingenuity" isn't just randomness combined with luck
Clearly you have a liberal definition of "same"
Also it is kinda a self-report that you see "ingenuity" that way.
The patterns behind "ingenuity" are found only by those who hypothesize their existence.
If you believe it is randomness/luck, then I can safely say you haven't ever found and never will find them.