Mars In 2026
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)23:04:33 | 19 comments | 3 images
spacex starship mars 2026
Is this doable?
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)23:09:24 No.16559426
>>16559419
That seems overly optimistic.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)23:12:57 No.16559430
1737069324133462
SpaceX plans to crash five uncrewed Starships into Mars in [soon, but not too soon, but soon enough for investors to jizz in their pants a little, but not soon enough that there could be plausible delay] years, Musk Says
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)01:02:04 No.16559574
1735428413469793
>>16559419
felon muskrat is a pathological liar and a fraud. Consider the implications
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)03:07:10 No.16559653
>>16559574
Show me where hurt you in Kamala's doll
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)07:01:21 No.16559834
>>16559419
unmanned should be easier no?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)07:05:26 No.16559839
I guess if they can get in orbit refueling working in the next 2 years they could send some starships towards mars to crash into it or float in space forever
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)07:08:24 No.16559842
>>16559419
he said that 5 years ago, and 5 years before that.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)07:15:02 No.16559850
>>16559430
It's the soonest practical launch window to aim for. The previous one would have been in 2024 when that article was posted
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)10:16:45 No.16560020
Laughing_Coffee_Drinker
>>16559430
>SpaceX plans to crash five uncrewed Starships into Mars

This is very likely... they will crash one after another and SpaceX engineering will learn from each one.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)10:24:46 No.16560030
>>16559834
It should be the only way. The human mission is always going to be too dangerous. We should learn to be able to survive ANYTHING down here.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)10:33:50 No.16560034
>>16560030
using robots for deploying the whole base makes more sense than using humans but at the end of the day they're doing it so humans can go there.
if they solve the base there and transport I'd take a ride for sure, if I could afford it.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)10:35:58 No.16560037
>>16559430
Yes, and?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)14:36:53 No.16560286
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)14:37:45 No.16560288
>>16559574
So you were among those he considered entirely superfluous and promptly fired, got it.

>>16559834
Several of the other mission plans had initial first increwed missions with equipment to be started up before the astronauts landed.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)14:37:53 No.16560289
>>16559430
he said 2024 but they haven't gotten the inflight refueling working yet, which is needed to get that fat heavy bitch out of the Earthsphere
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)14:41:56 No.16560295
>>16559834
they need to test the vehicles as well, you don't want to risk humans on your first ride down into that gravity well if you aren't convinced you can get to the surface in one piece
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)14:42:57 No.16560298
>>16559842
false
he's said 2022 and then 2024
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)22:31:38 No.16560790
even if the uncrewed missions go well, wouldn't they need a reactor or something to ISRU enough fuel for the return trip?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)23:16:31 No.16560825
for any country with a shitskin problem, no