>>16555259
I dont know if this fits but whenever I hear somebody spouting some "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" bullshit I'll usually ask them what an abstract is and that shits down the conversation. These idiots have never read a paper in their lives.

>>16555259
If you can post a paper where that happens I would love to see it, otherwise you are in fact reading a blog and then whining that the blog you read was a blog instead of a paper which really is a "you" problem

>>16555263
It's funny when you see an atheist say something genuinely unfounded and pathos based and then you actually pull something up with scientific basis and they literally just ignore it or deny it's existence. Like I showed one a journal about the shroudn from 2019 and they deboonked it with the original flawed 1989 article which mistook a burnt restoration sample as the main fabric.
>>16555259
Do people actually think flat earthers are that much of a threat to science they need to be constantly deboonked?
https://youtu.be/JsETzrRr3is?si=atjsgStbMPsT65uR
Dude has a successful educational series he does flat earthers aren't even that big of a thing anymore why does he continue to do them?

>>16555273
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2626656/
https://phys.org/news/2024-07-scientific-fraud-uncovering
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35846466/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24796637/
Shalom goyim

I understand that you can do science in a basement, but I understand the stance of ignoring basement scientists as they often get basic things wrong.

this retard acts like big bang is a fact and not just a very delusional christcuck self insertion into science

>>16555259
>deboonking flat eathers
It's often amazing to me just how bad the "people on the right side of history" are even at tasks like the one you mention.
Their idea of debunking flat-earth is to show a picture or cite a paper or something naive and mindless like that.

>>16555289
all flat earthers are retarded though

>>16555274
>why does he continue to do them?
It's easy

so the only course of action for flat-earthers is to just refuse any kind of proof from now on? wow such creative

>>16555294
No,the course of action is to ignore flat earthers. Because they're retarded.

>>16555294
always has been, they invent schizophrenic explanations for every proof of curvature

>>16555288
The greatest sin of atheism was being gaslight by a Catholic priest and not even knowing it.

>>16555259
force people to confront the ugly truth so the mysticism is erased

>>16555329
>Catholic priest
jesuit
please understand the legacy of loyola followers and the oaths they swear

>>16555341
synonyms still describe one specific thing

>>16555345
So we should just be clear and call them jewish kabalah following infiltration of the catholic church?

>>16555280
Doesn't seem to support your point. These people aren't dunking on flat earthers nor are they claiming to "speak on behalf of The Science™" Did you post the wrong links by accident or did I trigger a spam bot or something?

>>16555399
Dave is, ya dolt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQVF0Yu7X24

>>16555259
Realizing that science is cringe is step 1

>>16555259
>flat eathers and creationsits
not either one of these but flat earthers are claiming scientific evidence for their position, while creationists claim forms of philosophical uniformitarianism. Something that is not a scientific view.

So to say that you can debunk creationists using science is like saying you can debunk george lucas by appealing to wookies. It makes no reasonable sense. You have to meet them on logical, philosophical, theological grounds.

What a hack FRAUD

>Professor Dave
>No PhD
?

>>16555741
what are you yapping about?

you must be hearing things because i dont think ive ever heard a creationist say they believe creationism on the basis of scientific evidence. They usually believe some sort of non-universalism that is compatible with their studies.

>>16555791
>>16555761
Like if he was a joke account it would be fine but he’s ACTUALLY trying to pass himself off as one.

>>16555274
Pretty sure 99% of flat earthers were simply attention whoring trolls. The 1% who truly believed it are too retarded to bother trying to convince otherwise.

If your entire interaction with science has been through drama/deboonking youtube videos, obviously you will think the discipline is filled with uninformed faggots. You are getting mad at redditors, which is fine in moderation, but becomes embarrassing when you make posts asking what we can do to stop them from being redditors.

>>16556431
flat earth is a weapon used to dismiss conspiracy research a lot of it was promoted by glowie sources

>>16555259
Who cares? The masses will flock towards the most insipid and easily digestible options no matter what. This is not a good thing, but its better than bringing everything down to the same level.

>>16558020
Trvke>>16558041
I care because I hate midwits.

>>16558041
If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?

>>16555259
simple. stop using tech and move to the amish people.

>>16558102
Most smart people die in debt slavery and poverty desu.

>>16555259
>How do we stop their slimy spread
Just keep showing normal people "Experts Agree there are 53 Genders And Literally All Of Them Can Get Pregnant!" headlines. Problem will solve itself over time.

>>16558209
Problem is,science worshippers are troon worshippers also.

>>16558195
Sounds like dumb losers to me.

>>16559019
its probably because they dont live in our heads rent-fucking-free, /pol/tard.

>>16555259
The people your describing arent scientist or care about the scientific method, their more like ideologists who use scientism as a way to act superiour, essentially its appeal to authority fallacy maxxed

You fix it by teaching epistemology and critical thinking. The science worshippers just transplanted the same dogmatic preacher structure of the church onto science. They are NPCs who want to be told what to think and not how to think for themselves. You have to break the conditioning.

>>16559142
pretty good cartoon desu, funny because you can objectively say that society is multitudes worse now in comparison to what it was in the 60s

>>16559231
>thinks a society was better when there was segregation and leaded gasoline
You're retarded

>>16559261
poor bait, try again harder

>>16559019
Polls show agreement with trans ideology has been slipping for years and is currently falling off a cliff.

>>16559142
Society has collapsed in the places where these people are most common and wield the most political power.

>>16559271
no, its master bait

>>16555259
We should apply the free market method and create scientific communities independent from academia.

>>16559142
I can tolerate gays. Trannies need to be ostracized and forbidden from influencing their will on children, or having a voice in society in general.

>>16555259
Fuck off, retard. Dave is the perfect counter to science hating conservative, religious retards like you because he does not tolerate one bit of your bullshit, and that's why you hate him.

>>16559415
No idea who this is but if op pic is representative then it seems his entire schtick is namecalling and othering, which doesn't persuade anyone.

Also he uses "anti-establishment" as an insult, luhmao.

>>16559422
> which doesn't persuade anyone.
>Also he uses "anti-establishment" as an insult, luhmao.
"People" like you don't need to be persuaded. You should be insulted and shamed in public for your retardation.

>>16559433
Yeah that doesn't accomplish anything and just makes everyone outside your bubble hate you.

>>16559452
Good thing I'm not a retard (like you) who bases his opinions on whether or not they'll be hated by anti-science mongrels.

>>16559456
Cry more, cowardly retard

>>16559458
I hear if you call someone retard 100 times you automatically win the argument and everyone will vote for you.

>>16555274
>why does he continue to do them?
It's S tier entertainment

>>16559271
so poor, its hurts to read it.

>>16559293
>for me its collapsed, so it is collapsed, even when everything is the same as before
payed or shilling

>>16559405
>I somehow think half of them are ok, b-but not the others because <lies>