Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)14:51:34 | 36 comments | 11 images
https://tiermaker.com/create/camera-body-manufacterers-17727543-2
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)15:37:47 No.4400659
>>4400655
Looks like you get all your opinions from the mindless contrarians and paid shills on 4chan and youtube.
Can we see your photos?
If you refuse, we will assume you are a paid shill.
Looks like you get all your opinions from the mindless contrarians and paid shills on 4chan and youtube.
Can we see your photos?
If you refuse, we will assume you are a paid shill.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)15:54:54 No.4400661
>>4400655
You forgot to put Sinar in SSS tier.
You forgot to put Sinar in SSS tier.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)15:55:14 No.4400662
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)17:56:56 No.4400675
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)17:59:16 No.4400676
>>4400675
A look into a Chad's fantasy world: the post.
A look into a Chad's fantasy world: the post.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)18:00:17 No.4400677
>>4400676
FUCK MY PHONES AUTO CORRECT. I MEANT CHUD DAMMIT.
FUCK MY PHONES AUTO CORRECT. I MEANT CHUD DAMMIT.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)18:23:11 No.4400678
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)18:24:20 No.4400679
>>4400675
This is correct
This is correct
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)19:21:31 No.4400685
Sony, Canon and Nikon should all be the same tier.
Please don't underestimate Canons ability to make absolutely trash cameras, made of kiddy toy plastic, with horrible ergonomics.
Please don't underestimate Canons ability to make absolutely trash cameras, made of kiddy toy plastic, with horrible ergonomics.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)19:30:11 No.4400686
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)19:43:56 No.4400688
>>4400686
You posted dog, so I can live with it. Still no Sinar in SSS tier, which is kind of a big fail.
You posted dog, so I can live with it. Still no Sinar in SSS tier, which is kind of a big fail.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)20:09:38 No.4400690
>>4400688
that would be SSSinar then
that would be SSSinar then
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)20:31:13 No.4400692
>>4400690
Exactly. Leica purchased them a while back, but I still count them as a seperate entity.
Exactly. Leica purchased them a while back, but I still count them as a seperate entity.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)22:25:46 No.4400711
>>4400655
I've only used four.
I've only used four.
Anonymous 01/20/25(Mon)22:40:14 No.4400715
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)02:43:11 No.4400757
Only rating bodies I actually owned
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)05:41:57 No.4400774
>>4400715
this but with my camera
this but with my camera
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)07:07:35 No.4400786
>>4400715
this nigga has a point, camera is just a tool and in good hands it can make wonderful pics, fe2fucker made a camera outta garbage bottle caps and duct tape and it worked.
this nigga has a point, camera is just a tool and in good hands it can make wonderful pics, fe2fucker made a camera outta garbage bottle caps and duct tape and it worked.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)07:21:04 No.4400787
If you disagree you're gay
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)07:54:48 No.4400789
>>4400655
Sike, it's all Cosina. Always has been always will be
Sike, it's all Cosina. Always has been always will be
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)10:02:39 No.4400800
>>4400655
My $0.02, don't shame me, I'm immune.
My $0.02, don't shame me, I'm immune.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)10:45:46 No.4400811
Interesting, Canon has the highest average rating so far...
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)13:47:55 No.4400866
>>4400811
I wasn't going to reply but...
I wasn't going to reply but...
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)14:04:46 No.4400869
OP here. I’m using the data gathered itt to compare how gearfags and professional photographers (in another forum) view camera brands.
So far, gearfags have a lower opinion of sony and nikon (pros consistently rate both as S), a lower opinion of fujifilm (pros havent placed them lower than A), and have a higher opinion of small and obscure brands. canon, which pros are rating closer to B and C tier, is also well likes here. Probably because they have impressively long spec sheets. I wonder why pros dont like them? Probably because they are forced to use them for some employers?
Keep it up. We need more data.
So far, gearfags have a lower opinion of sony and nikon (pros consistently rate both as S), a lower opinion of fujifilm (pros havent placed them lower than A), and have a higher opinion of small and obscure brands. canon, which pros are rating closer to B and C tier, is also well likes here. Probably because they have impressively long spec sheets. I wonder why pros dont like them? Probably because they are forced to use them for some employers?
Keep it up. We need more data.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)14:04:53 No.4400870
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)20:27:30 No.4400995
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)21:02:58 No.4401004
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)21:04:13 No.4401005
>>4400675
based
based
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)22:40:00 No.4401020
>>4401004
Sinar still makes digital backs and professional technical bodies for those digital backs. Incredibly expensive, but it looks like pretty nice stuff.
Sinar still makes digital backs and professional technical bodies for those digital backs. Incredibly expensive, but it looks like pretty nice stuff.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)00:45:48 No.4401028
>>4400685
>horrible ergonomics.
Isn't ergonomics one of the things they are good at? Even Snoy started copying them in their later models with more rounded edges and deeper grips.
>horrible ergonomics.
Isn't ergonomics one of the things they are good at? Even Snoy started copying them in their later models with more rounded edges and deeper grips.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)01:01:22 No.4401030
>>4400995
>Any anon's here own one?
Yeah
>Does anyone use them?
Lol no
Unless you're talking about their mirrorless L mount bodies, those are just like A7C alternatives that cost more. But their Foveon stuff is a meme
>Any anon's here own one?
Yeah
>Does anyone use them?
Lol no
Unless you're talking about their mirrorless L mount bodies, those are just like A7C alternatives that cost more. But their Foveon stuff is a meme
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)03:09:34 No.4401063
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)08:22:59 No.4401109
>>4400786
Digital Rev Tv had a great segment called "Pro tog cheap camera" that proves this point.
As I can tell based on your comment, you can discern that most people thats been posting here have probably shot one or two brands of cameras and they are just ranking by how they have been influenced. Not even talking regarding the fact most dont even take photos.
Imagine a painter ranking brush brands and getting into arguments about it.
Its just dropping names, feeling important and larping photography.
Digital Rev Tv had a great segment called "Pro tog cheap camera" that proves this point.
As I can tell based on your comment, you can discern that most people thats been posting here have probably shot one or two brands of cameras and they are just ranking by how they have been influenced. Not even talking regarding the fact most dont even take photos.
Imagine a painter ranking brush brands and getting into arguments about it.
Its just dropping names, feeling important and larping photography.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)08:42:07 No.4401110
>>4401063
nophoto
nophoto
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:08:38 No.4401164
>>4401109
Painters absolutely argue each others ears off about paint brands, canvas quality and the relative merits of synthetic vs. various kinds of animal hair brushes.
Also... The one you have with you.
Painters absolutely argue each others ears off about paint brands, canvas quality and the relative merits of synthetic vs. various kinds of animal hair brushes.
Also... The one you have with you.