Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)01:40:49 | 6 comments
Kind of funny how intentionally fucking up film exposure is considered the better aesthetic now
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Color Space Information | Uncalibrated |
| Image Width | 610 |
| Image Height | 610 |
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)08:17:13 No.4399120
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)09:02:18 No.4399126
>>4399120
Who is esthetic, Aunt Esther’s retarded sister?
Who is esthetic, Aunt Esther’s retarded sister?
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)09:53:36 No.4399135
>>4399126
you know retard
you know retard
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)11:29:55 No.4399151
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)14:03:38 No.4399174
>>4399151
the box literally suggests over exposing for a color shift. hell cinestill also tells you to over expose
the box literally suggests over exposing for a color shift. hell cinestill also tells you to over expose
Anonymous 01/15/25(Wed)15:10:41 No.4399684
>>4399174
it's not quite a color shift in the sense of changing hue, only saturation
there's good latitude on film, they probably suggest overexposing it because this way you can get details in the shadows because people who buy these types of film (overpriced respooled stuff) are hipsters and teenagers with point and shoots who don't know what they're doing
it's not quite a color shift in the sense of changing hue, only saturation
there's good latitude on film, they probably suggest overexposing it because this way you can get details in the shadows because people who buy these types of film (overpriced respooled stuff) are hipsters and teenagers with point and shoots who don't know what they're doing