Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)19:26:16 | 18 comments | 2 images
>the perfect compact FF mirrorless camera cant possibly exi-
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Camera Software | Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Image Created | 2024:04:24 11:39:49 |
Color Space Information | Uncalibrated |
Image Width | 900 |
Image Height | 517 |
Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)19:42:02 No.4397753
I’d buy it in a heartbeat. It can’t exist as you have it rendered though, there’s no mechanical linkage on the Z mount for rangefinder cam coupling.
Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)20:05:21 No.4397754
>>4397752
did you make this in Photoshop?
did you make this in Photoshop?
Anonymous 01/07/25(Tue)20:59:14 No.4397762
>>4397753
rangefinder-by-wire? No reason it can't be done. I don't see the rangefinder window though, looks like just a viewfinder
rangefinder-by-wire? No reason it can't be done. I don't see the rangefinder window though, looks like just a viewfinder
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)01:42:27 No.4397811
I'm honestly convinced that the autists asking for a new rangefinder camera have never shot a rangefinder camera and just want to LARP as Leicatards without shooting Poojifilm.
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)01:45:56 No.4397812
>>4397752
>z mount
>compact
the perils of using a medium format mount for full frame and aps-c
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>z mount
>compact
the perils of using a medium format mount for full frame and aps-c
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: | |
Image-Specific Properties: | |
Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
Color Space Information | sRGB |
Image Width | 2048 |
Image Height | 1040 |
Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)03:21:25 No.4397819
>>4397811
Whos actually asking for a rangefinder? Theres a difference between a rangefinder style camera without the EVF hump and an actual rangefinder.
Whos actually asking for a rangefinder? Theres a difference between a rangefinder style camera without the EVF hump and an actual rangefinder.
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)07:49:31 No.4397833
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)08:41:36 No.4397839
>>4397819
How is it that over a decade later only SNOY can figure this out?
Even foolji has given up, x-e hasn't been updated in 3 years
How is it that over a decade later only SNOY can figure this out?
Even foolji has given up, x-e hasn't been updated in 3 years
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)09:55:13 No.4397847
>>4397811
100% true
100% true
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)10:23:02 No.4397853
>>4397752
with modern af who cares about rangefinder maybe auto adjust uncorrected parallax optical finder for 28/35/40/50mm
with modern af who cares about rangefinder maybe auto adjust uncorrected parallax optical finder for 28/35/40/50mm
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)11:15:18 No.4397866
>>4397839
japanese noses are very small
japanese noses are very small
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)16:11:03 No.4397948
>>4397752
Yeah the ovf would be the most useless function in this camera, like most of the pro and x100 owners never use it.
Yeah the ovf would be the most useless function in this camera, like most of the pro and x100 owners never use it.
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)09:45:44 No.4398598
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)07:46:27 No.4399115
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)08:04:56 No.4399118
>>4398598
No Leica has a rangefinder with no screen at all. You have to use the phone app to preview images. Or wait until you ingest to a computer.
No Leica has a rangefinder with no screen at all. You have to use the phone app to preview images. Or wait until you ingest to a computer.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)09:15:24 No.4399128
>>4397948
OVF’s should be modular. If you wear glasses, are old (the target consumer for $5k camera bodies) or your eyes aren’t that good & struggle to see tiny detail, or shoot off your histogram, you’re not using the little VF anyway, you’re using the screen, +the VF’s are never 100% of image size anyway, and take up a lot of extra space on top and off the back of the camera body and add a bunch of extra cost. Modular VF that just plugs into the hot shoe with a waterproof seal, & has its own hot shoe on top for accessories, for the geeks who want all that.
OVF’s should be modular. If you wear glasses, are old (the target consumer for $5k camera bodies) or your eyes aren’t that good & struggle to see tiny detail, or shoot off your histogram, you’re not using the little VF anyway, you’re using the screen, +the VF’s are never 100% of image size anyway, and take up a lot of extra space on top and off the back of the camera body and add a bunch of extra cost. Modular VF that just plugs into the hot shoe with a waterproof seal, & has its own hot shoe on top for accessories, for the geeks who want all that.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)09:18:15 No.4399129
>>4399128
Evf not ovf
Evf not ovf
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)10:05:01 No.4399136
>>4399118
or use EVF
or use EVF