Zuiko 28mm f/2.0 vs Zuiko 35mm f/2.0
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)10:10:38 | 15 comments
Dubs decide my next purchase.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)10:12:17 No.4397424
>>4397423
kys
kys
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)10:19:15 No.4397426
>>4397423
What other OM lenses do you already own? Normally I'd pack a 28/50/100/180 combo, I love using my OM-4Ti
What other OM lenses do you already own? Normally I'd pack a 28/50/100/180 combo, I love using my OM-4Ti
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)11:42:54 No.4397437
>>4397426
based OM-4Ti enjoyer
I have a 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/2.8, 200mm f/4 and a 300mm f/4.5
I don't particularly enjoy the 28mm f/2.8 unless I'm inside which, during winter, I'm a lot. So maybe the upgrade to f/2 would be worth it since fast speed colour film comes at a premium these days.
On the other hand I use the 50mm f/1.4 A LOT so maybe the 35mm f/2 would be the way to go?
It's literally a coin toss for me.
based OM-4Ti enjoyer
I have a 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/2.8, 200mm f/4 and a 300mm f/4.5
I don't particularly enjoy the 28mm f/2.8 unless I'm inside which, during winter, I'm a lot. So maybe the upgrade to f/2 would be worth it since fast speed colour film comes at a premium these days.
On the other hand I use the 50mm f/1.4 A LOT so maybe the 35mm f/2 would be the way to go?
It's literally a coin toss for me.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)12:14:21 No.4397446
56mm f/4
70mm f/4
70mm f/4
fe2fucker 01/06/25(Mon)12:53:53 No.4397467
both motherfucker
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)13:19:51 No.4397485
i don't have any horse in this race but i like my 50mm 1.8 zuiko for my om-2n
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)14:21:01 No.4397519
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)14:22:08 No.4397520
neither and switch to nikon
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)14:24:30 No.4397521
>>4397519
if i were in your shoes I'd be looking for the 35 then I guess, but that's mainly because I already have a 50 i like and a 28 I enjoy for a different mount so it'd be nice to get an inbetween and differentiate what I use my bodies for even more
if i were in your shoes I'd be looking for the 35 then I guess, but that's mainly because I already have a 50 i like and a 28 I enjoy for a different mount so it'd be nice to get an inbetween and differentiate what I use my bodies for even more
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)14:24:37 No.4397522
I have the 21mm f/2.0 and the 28mm f/2.0. Haven't messed around with the latter much, but the former is one overrated, overpriced piece of shit, but I was playing with the idea of getting more of the f/2.0s such as the 24 and the 35 just to build a set.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)14:46:53 No.4397525
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)18:18:25 No.4397568
>>4397520
>switch to an 800 dollar fully mechanical camera that needs a shutter replacement every two rolls with my AF-D from the 90s with image quality from the 60's
Nah, got rid of all my Nikon shit. It's total garbage.
>switch to an 800 dollar fully mechanical camera that needs a shutter replacement every two rolls with my AF-D from the 90s with image quality from the 60's
Nah, got rid of all my Nikon shit. It's total garbage.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)18:37:37 No.4397569
On general principal, it seems like the 35mm would make a good stopgap between too wide and too narrow. The slightly narrower FOV would also make more natural background separation.
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)21:34:52 No.4397589
The 35mm f2 is better optically. Even if you don't use it as much at least it covers a new focal length, maybe get a 85mm for that 35/85 pairing
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)21:47:19 No.4397595
>>4397568
Who are you quoting?
Anyways there are a ton of affordable and reliable nikon film cameras from the 80s and 90s. I quite enjoy not having to wind film or manually advance after every shot.
Who are you quoting?
Anyways there are a ton of affordable and reliable nikon film cameras from the 80s and 90s. I quite enjoy not having to wind film or manually advance after every shot.