Instagram Thread
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)04:39:00 | 102 comments | 28 images
Post your Insta, follow others, critique each other etc
I'll leave some feedback for the initial posts to get things rolling.
I'll leave some feedback for the initial posts to get things rolling.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)05:02:13 No.4395316
Why did you post your school bully, OP?
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)06:05:13 No.4395329
Mine is @vanbrandenburg.photography
I mainly shoot digital, but I've been shooting more film recently.
I mainly shoot digital, but I've been shooting more film recently.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)06:11:37 No.4395330
>>4395329
Based, I follow you already. I like seeing your stuff come up in my feed, most stuff like that bottom middle photo would be awesome to see. You pick some really good times of day and locations for photos.
Based, I follow you already. I like seeing your stuff come up in my feed, most stuff like that bottom middle photo would be awesome to see. You pick some really good times of day and locations for photos.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)06:17:21 No.4395331
>>4395314
Why dows this remind me of Borderlands?
Why dows this remind me of Borderlands?
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)06:19:41 No.4395332
https://www.instagram.com/clearbluewindow/
Majority is digital, I have some film I still need to develop. I want to do more portraits but I'm not sure how to find models and asking friends feels awkward.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Majority is digital, I have some film I still need to develop. I want to do more portraits but I'm not sure how to find models and asking friends feels awkward.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)08:32:29 No.4395345
I think a lot of us here are already following each other, lol.
Maybe we should comment more under our publications, even if Instagram doesn't value it.
Maybe we should comment more under our publications, even if Instagram doesn't value it.
Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 12/28/24(Sat)09:42:46 No.4395351
I am probably the only one here not on IG
And I refuse to join.
And I refuse to join.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)10:10:25 No.4395353
>>4395351
>Turn on trip to announce to a thread that you're special and unique
I have no social media either but you don't see me making a 4chan account to fuckin boast about it. You might as well make an insta, you seem to have the right mindset.
>Turn on trip to announce to a thread that you're special and unique
I have no social media either but you don't see me making a 4chan account to fuckin boast about it. You might as well make an insta, you seem to have the right mindset.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)10:29:05 No.4395355
>>4395329
Been following you since the last time you posted in the Instagram Thread.
>>4395332
Your latest post (DEGkKywyV9W) - nailed the lighting, botched the perspective a little. Tag your locations when posting architecture, people will want to know what they're looking at.
CIypxPKpfPq is your best photo by far.
I'm https://www.instagram.com/ozren.c/ and I'll be here all week.
Been following you since the last time you posted in the Instagram Thread.
>>4395332
Your latest post (DEGkKywyV9W) - nailed the lighting, botched the perspective a little. Tag your locations when posting architecture, people will want to know what they're looking at.
CIypxPKpfPq is your best photo by far.
I'm https://www.instagram.com/ozren.c/ and I'll be here all week.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)10:43:27 No.4395356
>>4395331
>Why dows this remind me of Borderlands?
Because you are too ignorant and intellectually stunted to analyze it and decipher the obviousness of why
>Why dows this remind me of Borderlands?
Because you are too ignorant and intellectually stunted to analyze it and decipher the obviousness of why
Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 12/28/24(Sat)10:48:45 No.4395358
NPHT !!k0AhjBTi6l+ 12/28/24(Sat)10:49:56 No.4395360
>>4395358
KYS, contrarian.
KYS, contrarian.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)10:53:41 No.4395361
>>4395351
>redditspacing
>ego tripfagging
Someone should hammer you down fag, but then again someone should also do the same to those who doxx themselves in these threads
>redditspacing
>ego tripfagging
Someone should hammer you down fag, but then again someone should also do the same to those who doxx themselves in these threads
Sugar !egyYvoBZV2 12/28/24(Sat)10:58:59 No.4395362
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)11:15:19 No.4395363
>>4395362
The irony is you're also displaying high school clout seeking behavior by having a trip. You're calling people nophotos while hoping everyone remembers your super special pics so you don't have to post any either. You're sitting at the loser's table making snide remarks about the cool kids so that you can make yourself seem cool too. The reason you don't use social media is either because you're scared of some boogeyman or because you know that you'll be lost in the sea of other unremarkable photographers on that platform. So you post on 4chan and shit on everyone who doesn't reverse you here, where most people are passing through and don't give a shit anyway but by the only objective measure (getting (you)s) you're doing great because people want to tell you off.
The irony is you're also displaying high school clout seeking behavior by having a trip. You're calling people nophotos while hoping everyone remembers your super special pics so you don't have to post any either. You're sitting at the loser's table making snide remarks about the cool kids so that you can make yourself seem cool too. The reason you don't use social media is either because you're scared of some boogeyman or because you know that you'll be lost in the sea of other unremarkable photographers on that platform. So you post on 4chan and shit on everyone who doesn't reverse you here, where most people are passing through and don't give a shit anyway but by the only objective measure (getting (you)s) you're doing great because people want to tell you off.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)11:23:29 No.4395364
>>4395351
Great so this thread isn't for you, attention whore tripfag. No one asked, no one cares you obese fucking TRUCKER.
Great so this thread isn't for you, attention whore tripfag. No one asked, no one cares you obese fucking TRUCKER.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)11:32:34 No.4395366
>>4395351
Your photos would probably be too low of a standard for Instagram anyway.
Your photos would probably be too low of a standard for Instagram anyway.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)11:34:33 No.4395367
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)14:28:41 No.4395388
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)15:30:43 No.4395397
>>4395362
Start posting photos anytime you piece of shit
Start posting photos anytime you piece of shit
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)16:02:21 No.4395403
>>4395330
Thanks for the kind words Anon. I'd love to take more pics like that bottom one, it was on expired AGFA XRG 100, had this faded look the whole time, I loved it.
>>4395332
You've got a wonderful eye for composition, I'm looking forward to seeing more of your work.
>>4395345
Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.
>>4395355
Been following you too, those city shots are great.
>>4395367
I like the subject matter Anon. Very interested to see more of your photos.
>>4395388
Really nice stuff Anon. You've got a good eye for colour and subject.
Thanks for the kind words Anon. I'd love to take more pics like that bottom one, it was on expired AGFA XRG 100, had this faded look the whole time, I loved it.
>>4395332
You've got a wonderful eye for composition, I'm looking forward to seeing more of your work.
>>4395345
Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.
>>4395355
Been following you too, those city shots are great.
>>4395367
I like the subject matter Anon. Very interested to see more of your photos.
>>4395388
Really nice stuff Anon. You've got a good eye for colour and subject.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)17:25:05 No.4395411
>>4395355
>Your latest post (DEGkKywyV9W) - nailed the lighting, botched the perspective a little.
Interesting, what should I have done different? Should I have gone for a lower perspective or is it a lens distortion issue?
I really like the colors in yours, that bottom middle photo on that collage is excellent. I love the sky color. Any tips on how you edit your photos?
>>4395367
That top row is insane, both for subjects and how they were taken. I'm really interested to know the story of that top middle photo.
>>4395388
Some really cool locations in these. The colors feel a little too muted for me, but that's completely subjective. That middle and bottom row are my favorites by far.
>Your latest post (DEGkKywyV9W) - nailed the lighting, botched the perspective a little.
Interesting, what should I have done different? Should I have gone for a lower perspective or is it a lens distortion issue?
I really like the colors in yours, that bottom middle photo on that collage is excellent. I love the sky color. Any tips on how you edit your photos?
>>4395367
That top row is insane, both for subjects and how they were taken. I'm really interested to know the story of that top middle photo.
>>4395388
Some really cool locations in these. The colors feel a little too muted for me, but that's completely subjective. That middle and bottom row are my favorites by far.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)17:48:09 No.4395420
>>4395411
>Interesting, what should I have done different? Should I have gone for a lower perspective or is it a lens distortion issue?
Symmetry and preservation of verticals, IMO.
>I really like the colors in yours, that bottom middle photo on that collage is excellent. I love the sky color. Any tips on how you edit your photos?
Thanks. I use gradients on my skies a lot, mostly radial, sometimes linear. Push the blues towards the green a bit and that's mostly it. Canon's color science does the rest.
Sometimes, when I shoot architecture during golden hour, I'll add some purple into the shadows as well and crush the blacks a bit.
>Interesting, what should I have done different? Should I have gone for a lower perspective or is it a lens distortion issue?
Symmetry and preservation of verticals, IMO.
>I really like the colors in yours, that bottom middle photo on that collage is excellent. I love the sky color. Any tips on how you edit your photos?
Thanks. I use gradients on my skies a lot, mostly radial, sometimes linear. Push the blues towards the green a bit and that's mostly it. Canon's color science does the rest.
Sometimes, when I shoot architecture during golden hour, I'll add some purple into the shadows as well and crush the blacks a bit.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)17:56:01 No.4395422
>>4395420
I think I see what you mean, thanks for the tip. I'll look more into perspective, I guess I just tried a little too hard for it to look realistic rather than artistic. It's been a tough balance for me admittedly, considering people tend to not like over edited photos.
>Push the blues towards the green a bit and that's mostly it.
Cool, I've give that a shot on some future photos and see how it goes. Though I'm guessing you keep that gradient on just the sky and don't let it affect the other blues in the image?
> I'll add some purple into the shadows as well and crush the blacks a bit.
Same. I want to do more crushed blacks but people always make it out to be the ultimate sin in photos, so I've almost never done it. I'm sitting on a few photos I haven't posted for that reason (pic related). Maybe I just don't know enough about the technique.
I think I see what you mean, thanks for the tip. I'll look more into perspective, I guess I just tried a little too hard for it to look realistic rather than artistic. It's been a tough balance for me admittedly, considering people tend to not like over edited photos.
>Push the blues towards the green a bit and that's mostly it.
Cool, I've give that a shot on some future photos and see how it goes. Though I'm guessing you keep that gradient on just the sky and don't let it affect the other blues in the image?
> I'll add some purple into the shadows as well and crush the blacks a bit.
Same. I want to do more crushed blacks but people always make it out to be the ultimate sin in photos, so I've almost never done it. I'm sitting on a few photos I haven't posted for that reason (pic related). Maybe I just don't know enough about the technique.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)18:12:33 No.4395424
>>4395422
>Though I'm guessing you keep that gradient on just the sky and don't let it affect the other blues in the image?
Yes, I use masking.
>I want to do more crushed blacks but people always make it out to be the ultimate sin in photos
Depends on the scene, I guess.
>Though I'm guessing you keep that gradient on just the sky and don't let it affect the other blues in the image?
Yes, I use masking.
>I want to do more crushed blacks but people always make it out to be the ultimate sin in photos
Depends on the scene, I guess.
Anonymous 12/28/24(Sat)18:13:39 No.4395425
>>4395424
>Depends on the scene, I guess.
Fair, I can see that. How is that photo above for it? Overcrushed?
>Depends on the scene, I guess.
Fair, I can see that. How is that photo above for it? Overcrushed?
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)00:35:53 No.4395465
>>4395424
Generally speaking, crushing the blacks is a 4chan approved hobby in all boards other than /p/. However,
>If the crushed blacks are not your main subject, it matters less
>If you're intentionally going for a silhouetted foreground / background then it's completely fine
>If the alternative is blowing highlights on something more important, like your subject, it's also completely fine
Don't worry about the faggots screeching about DR on this board, they havent shot anything with backlighting and/or shoot exclusively street """photos"""
Generally speaking, crushing the blacks is a 4chan approved hobby in all boards other than /p/. However,
>If the crushed blacks are not your main subject, it matters less
>If you're intentionally going for a silhouetted foreground / background then it's completely fine
>If the alternative is blowing highlights on something more important, like your subject, it's also completely fine
Don't worry about the faggots screeching about DR on this board, they havent shot anything with backlighting and/or shoot exclusively street """photos"""
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)02:30:26 No.4395481
>>4395465
>and/or shoot exclusively street """photos"""
One of the few instances where crushing blacks is good (in photos) so wrong, still i agree with the post
>and/or shoot exclusively street """photos"""
One of the few instances where crushing blacks is good (in photos) so wrong, still i agree with the post
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)02:41:19 No.4395482
>>4395465
DR is the single most important thing. Film basically had 20 fucking stops. Slide had 8 and everyone hated it. I used to own an mft and yes, DR matters a shitton and the only cope is dont take the photo or crush the shadows. Even FF digital is worse than film (blown highlights shift fucking pink)
I can expose negatives +5 stops on full frame thats solid white but on film its cleaner shadows and the highlights dont blow. engineering nerds will call me wrong because ackshually dynamic range is the signal to noise ratio of the normalized image but fuck them, digital cameras have ass DR.
DR is the single most important thing. Film basically had 20 fucking stops. Slide had 8 and everyone hated it. I used to own an mft and yes, DR matters a shitton and the only cope is dont take the photo or crush the shadows. Even FF digital is worse than film (blown highlights shift fucking pink)
I can expose negatives +5 stops on full frame thats solid white but on film its cleaner shadows and the highlights dont blow. engineering nerds will call me wrong because ackshually dynamic range is the signal to noise ratio of the normalized image but fuck them, digital cameras have ass DR.
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)04:59:34 No.4395490
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)06:14:41 No.4395493
>>4395482
Film negatives have better highlight detail than digital. But shadows lift much better on digital than on film.
Film negatives have better highlight detail than digital. But shadows lift much better on digital than on film.
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)06:28:57 No.4395496
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)12:45:11 No.4395527
>>4395496
Sorry I didnt know I was the gearfag for believing a $10 praktica with a $5 50mm f1.8 takes better photos than your $1699 x-t5 with its $1000 35mm f1.2 lm wr L g master S line. You don’t deserve to see my work. All gearfag means to you is anything that says your crappy digital camera is a scam. Typical digital consoomer. They cant even define hylicism without it being about defending their slop.
Sorry I didnt know I was the gearfag for believing a $10 praktica with a $5 50mm f1.8 takes better photos than your $1699 x-t5 with its $1000 35mm f1.2 lm wr L g master S line. You don’t deserve to see my work. All gearfag means to you is anything that says your crappy digital camera is a scam. Typical digital consoomer. They cant even define hylicism without it being about defending their slop.
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)13:04:06 No.4395534
>>4395527
>has to resort to foolji worm aps-c comparison
I agree film is better than that trash, even disposable cameras with plastic lenses.
>has to resort to foolji worm aps-c comparison
I agree film is better than that trash, even disposable cameras with plastic lenses.
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)13:05:20 No.4395535
>>4395534
Even worse, $5000 canikony blob
Even worse, $5000 canikony blob
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)13:53:47 No.4395546
I take lots of photos when I go on road trips. Would instagram be a good dumping ground for them or am I better off with some other platform? It's a pain in the ass to share them at the moment.
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)16:50:38 No.4395603
All 35mm, only been doing this for about a year, any criticism/advice welcome. Love these threads, some of you guys are pretty good.
https://www.instagram.com/swagmasterriles
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
https://www.instagram.com/swagmaste
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Equipment Make | NORITSU KOKI |
| Camera Model | EZ Controller |
| Camera Software | EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615) |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 1545 |
| Image Height | 1024 |
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)17:05:59 No.4395607
Anonymous 12/29/24(Sun)18:24:42 No.4395627
>>4395314
>Post your Insta
No. I refuse to post on Instagram because the platform doesn't offer revenue share with the creators akin to YT & X/twitter.
And no, I would not expect my Insta to be a cash cow or anything. I just won't provide Instagram with material without merit based compensation.
>Post your Insta
No. I refuse to post on Instagram because the platform doesn't offer revenue share with the creators akin to YT & X/twitter.
And no, I would not expect my Insta to be a cash cow or anything. I just won't provide Instagram with material without merit based compensation.
Anonymous 12/30/24(Mon)00:09:54 No.4395675
Anonymous 12/30/24(Mon)23:43:41 No.4395930
my film snapshits, i get a "good" one every now and then
https://instagram.com/comfyfilmclub
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
https://instagram.com/comfyfilmclub
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Equipment Make | NORITSU KOKI |
| Camera Model | EZ Controller |
| Camera Software | EZ Controller 8.00.011 (220309) |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Image Created | 2024:10:25 14:35:25 |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 3130 |
| Image Height | 2075 |
| Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Anonymous 12/31/24(Tue)08:44:10 No.4395981
>>4395607
Thank you, I’ve definitely had my share of bad photos but it’s nice to know I’m on the right track, at least.
I love Amsterdam, that trip was my fourth time and the first time not being broke. Had an apartment in the middle of the city for a week, got to be there for King’s Day, it was a blast, I didn’t want to go home by the end of it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Thank you, I’ve definitely had my share of bad photos but it’s nice to know I’m on the right track, at least.
I love Amsterdam, that trip was my fourth time and the first time not being broke. Had an apartment in the middle of the city for a week, got to be there for King’s Day, it was a blast, I didn’t want to go home by the end of it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Equipment Make | NORITSU KOKI |
| Camera Model | EZ Controller |
| Camera Software | EZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615) |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 1280 |
| Image Height | 849 |
Anonymous 01/01/25(Wed)02:09:51 No.4396088
>>4395546
IG is great for it, but just try to pick your best photos.
IG is great for it, but just try to pick your best photos.
Anonymous 01/01/25(Wed)09:54:54 No.4396136
>>4395314
https://www.instagram.com/cesfhiil/
recently started shooting again because of recent visits to /p/ lol.
especially with threads like these because I just get to browse people's pictures here.
https://www.instagram.com/cesfhiil/
recently started shooting again because of recent visits to /p/ lol.
especially with threads like these because I just get to browse people's pictures here.
Anonymous 01/01/25(Wed)12:53:08 No.4396163
https://www.instagram.com/lushlife75/
I'm presently trying to do more portraits and getting good results with my flash.
>>4395403
>Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.
I'm interested in reading what kind of project you have in mind.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
I'm presently trying to do more portraits and getting good results with my flash.
>>4395403
>Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.
I'm interested in reading what kind of project you have in mind.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Photographer | Louis-Philippe Balamba |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
Anonymous 01/01/25(Wed)15:22:10 No.4396230
>>4396163
That middle right train pic is pure kino
That middle right train pic is pure kino
Anonymous 01/01/25(Wed)15:57:49 No.4396259
>>4396230
I was half drunk when I saw her and I thought the same thing, lol.
I was half drunk when I saw her and I thought the same thing, lol.
Anonymous 01/01/25(Wed)16:09:40 No.4396263
>>4395403
>Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.
i'd be into that, sounds very cool and pretty fun.
it'd also increase how many people actually see our photos
>Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.
i'd be into that, sounds very cool and pretty fun.
it'd also increase how many people actually see our photos
Anonymous 01/02/25(Thu)12:36:36 No.4396450
instagram.com/crimsonqunny
Kinda new to photography, I shoot random things mostly street and portraits.
Kinda new to photography, I shoot random things mostly street and portraits.
Anonymous 01/02/25(Thu)15:30:51 No.4396509
Anonymous 01/02/25(Thu)20:11:39 No.4396546
>>4395627
lol
lol
Anonymous 01/03/25(Fri)00:50:04 No.4396572
>>4395627
insta is legit shit
if i want to show a friend a photo from last month and they dont have a facebook account due to being sane and intelligent, i have to download and text it and hope they dont use android
or just use flickr.
insta is legit shit
if i want to show a friend a photo from last month and they dont have a facebook account due to being sane and intelligent, i have to download and text it and hope they dont use android
or just use flickr.
Anonymous 01/03/25(Fri)03:15:18 No.4396598
>everyone has a gf and posts them on their insta
you fuckers are making me depressed
you fuckers are making me depressed
Anonymous 01/03/25(Fri)04:51:19 No.4396613
>>4396509
Sure thing, hopefully I won't get scolded by the guards lol
Sure thing, hopefully I won't get scolded by the guards lol
Anonymous 01/03/25(Fri)05:31:19 No.4396615
>>4395627
instagram is a cesspool of shit, you can get ban for nothing in the same time there are accounts posting rekt, animal abuse, onlyfans roasties pretending breastfeeding to show tits (breastfeeding, cancer awareness and protest are excluded from censorship there so they pretend to feed the doll as 'instructional video'). Meanwhile I've got 3 bans for literally nothing, had full bio with my name, architecture pictures, no skin, no political shit, just 'not following community guidelines'. You can appeal but it gets you nothing, those accounts have now been deleted for a year, stil cannot use that name to register new one.
BUT instagram is where ad agencies are, and having more than 10k followers in most lines of business place you in 'influencer' box and you start to get deals. That's where money from instagram is.
instagram is a cesspool of shit, you can get ban for nothing in the same time there are accounts posting rekt, animal abuse, onlyfans roasties pretending breastfeeding to show tits (breastfeeding, cancer awareness and protest are excluded from censorship there so they pretend to feed the doll as 'instructional video'). Meanwhile I've got 3 bans for literally nothing, had full bio with my name, architecture pictures, no skin, no political shit, just 'not following community guidelines'. You can appeal but it gets you nothing, those accounts have now been deleted for a year, stil cannot use that name to register new one.
BUT instagram is where ad agencies are, and having more than 10k followers in most lines of business place you in 'influencer' box and you start to get deals. That's where money from instagram is.
fe2fucker 01/03/25(Fri)06:12:58 No.4396617
>>4396615
Its ads. All social media is are ads disguised as content. Engagement bait if you will.
So its no wonder non advertisers are being pushed off their platforms, either via sneaky bans or algorithms hiding your content. This is why I like /pee/, no algo (yet)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Its ads. All social media is are ads disguised as content. Engagement bait if you will.
So its no wonder non advertisers are being pushed off their platforms, either via sneaky bans or algorithms hiding your content. This is why I like /pee/, no algo (yet)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Width | 1280 |
| Image Height | 758 |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
Anonymous 01/03/25(Fri)07:19:44 No.4396625
fe2fucker 01/03/25(Fri)07:57:16 No.4396626
>>4396625
:A)
:A)
Anonymous 01/04/25(Sat)07:08:14 No.4396873
>>4395981
It's a wonderful city, but a shame how bad the housing market is, otherwise I'd love to live there.
>>4396163
>I'm interested in reading what kind of project you have in mind.
I'd think a zine with contributions from Anons both in the form of photos and articles would be nice. Maybe some photo competitions included?
>>4396263
I think so too. For all the complaining and nophotos, /p/ is a pretty good community I'd argue.
>>4396450
Nice start Anon. You'll improve quickly if you keep taking that many photos. Looking forward to seeing more.
>>4396598
It should give you hope. If some of us stuck on this site can manage to get gfs then we all can.
It's a wonderful city, but a shame how bad the housing market is, otherwise I'd love to live there.
>>4396163
>I'm interested in reading what kind of project you have in mind.
I'd think a zine with contributions from Anons both in the form of photos and articles would be nice. Maybe some photo competitions included?
>>4396263
I think so too. For all the complaining and nophotos, /p/ is a pretty good community I'd argue.
>>4396450
Nice start Anon. You'll improve quickly if you keep taking that many photos. Looking forward to seeing more.
>>4396598
It should give you hope. If some of us stuck on this site can manage to get gfs then we all can.
Anonymous 01/05/25(Sun)15:04:09 No.4397239
>www.instagram.com/azamatesm
I failed at being a popular IG photographer it seems. What else can I do with my photos?
I failed at being a popular IG photographer it seems. What else can I do with my photos?
Anonymous 01/06/25(Mon)01:53:31 No.4397352
>>4397239
some of these lack sovl. there's more to a photo just looking perfect.
some of these lack sovl. there's more to a photo just looking perfect.
Anonymous 01/08/25(Wed)14:42:28 No.4397925
https://www.instagram.com/dark_indigox/
Anonymous 01/10/25(Fri)23:28:54 No.4398539
>>4397925
some kino, some gross
some kino, some gross
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)03:20:33 No.4398564
I’m very new to photography, I’d like to receive some feedback. I also opened this profile yesterday and it would be cool to kickstart it and get some following, so I follow back whoever follows me!
https://www.instagram.com/aeternumframe/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
https://www.instagram.com/aeternumf
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 216 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 216 dpi |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 1125 |
| Image Height | 1891 |
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)04:36:12 No.4398570
tumblr chads rise up!!
adriftingshade tumblr com
add dots. everything is posted on about a one-year delay. spoiler: my improvement in the past year is almost imperceptible
>>4397925
dope
>>4397239
clean shots, but kind of generic and it looks like ur getting hosed by compression
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
adriftingshade tumblr com
add dots. everything is posted on about a one-year delay. spoiler: my improvement in the past year is almost imperceptible
>>4397925
dope
>>4397239
clean shots, but kind of generic and it looks like ur getting hosed by compression
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Camera Software | GIMP 2.10.38 |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 37 dpcm |
| Vertical Resolution | 37 dpcm |
| Image Created | 2025:01:11 00:45:16 |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)06:13:03 No.4398581
>>4398570
>tumblr
Holy fuck I forgot it exists. How is it in comparison to IG? Maybe I could get it to try and boost my IG a little and not care too much about keeping a theme each week and just dump my recent photos.
>tumblr
Holy fuck I forgot it exists. How is it in comparison to IG? Maybe I could get it to try and boost my IG a little and not care too much about keeping a theme each week and just dump my recent photos.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)03:16:52 No.4399077
>>4398581
better for posting photos because you can present them any way you like. worse for interacting with people because almost no one is on it. although you can make your page open to the public whereas i think ig is always login-walled?
better for posting photos because you can present them any way you like. worse for interacting with people because almost no one is on it. although you can make your page open to the public whereas i think ig is always login-walled?
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)04:05:39 No.4399089
>>4399077
IG is open to the public by default, but it can be private. You get cockblocked with a login screen if you try to go too far back on someones page though, it only really lets you see posts from the last few months without logging in.
IG is open to the public by default, but it can be private. You get cockblocked with a login screen if you try to go too far back on someones page though, it only really lets you see posts from the last few months without logging in.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)05:58:43 No.4399098
>>4398581
It's still got a pretty big base. I post maybe 10 times a month on it and maybe one or two of the shots will get a few hundred likes. All time most popular posts kick around forever though and just keep growing. Very different from Instagram's algo and your photos basically only getting 12-24 hours to be shown to people.
It's still got a pretty big base. I post maybe 10 times a month on it and maybe one or two of the shots will get a few hundred likes. All time most popular posts kick around forever though and just keep growing. Very different from Instagram's algo and your photos basically only getting 12-24 hours to be shown to people.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)09:05:46 No.4399127
>>4395314
500px is for pro’s who make $
Insta is for retards who want to shoot OF whores
Tumblr is for angsty millenial lesbian housewives
500px is for pro’s who make $
Insta is for retards who want to shoot OF whores
Tumblr is for angsty millenial lesbian housewives
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)11:45:10 No.4399158
>not a single good portrait in this thread
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)16:54:12 No.4399202
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)19:17:42 No.4399224
https://www.instagram.com/mihnea.l.udrea?igsh=MTFpcnM2anppYnRtdA%3D%3D&utm_source=qr
Critique away! I haven’t posted consistently since August and I’m sitting on a massive backlog. I finally posted something from 2023 about a week ago.
Critique away! I haven’t posted consistently since August and I’m sitting on a massive backlog. I finally posted something from 2023 about a week ago.
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)21:38:08 No.4399248
>>4399127
>500px is a Chinese owned image site that uses AI algorithms that will analyze photos on if they're good or not and push them to the front page
kek
>500px is a Chinese owned image site that uses AI algorithms that will analyze photos on if they're good or not and push them to the front page
kek
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)22:19:19 No.4399262
>>4399248
Those chinky bastards!
Those chinky bastards!
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)22:49:17 No.4399265
>>4399248
Is that any different than if some tard selects what he likes for the front page features? Either way it’s out of your control whether you get featured or not. Not that it matters bc front page spot doesn’t actually get you anything,
Is that any different than if some tard selects what he likes for the front page features? Either way it’s out of your control whether you get featured or not. Not that it matters bc front page spot doesn’t actually get you anything,
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)22:51:10 No.4399266
>>4399089
>You get cockblocked with a login screen if you try to go too far back on someones page though
that's what i'm referring to. lately it lets me scroll down two rows of posts before walling you for the rest of the browser session. or it'll wall you the second you click on a post to look at. essentially unusable unlogged in
>You get cockblocked with a login screen if you try to go too far back on someones page though
that's what i'm referring to. lately it lets me scroll down two rows of posts before walling you for the rest of the browser session. or it'll wall you the second you click on a post to look at. essentially unusable unlogged in
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)00:50:23 No.4399291
>>4399265
I think his point is that it's literally no better in any way and it was pointless to even mention it.
I think his point is that it's literally no better in any way and it was pointless to even mention it.
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)05:00:41 No.4399316
i do wildlife photography:
https://www.instagram.com/jackcwildlife/
>>4395332
some of these are really good
>>4396615
ive been trying to slowly climb my way into that 10k box
best method ive found is just going through suggested accounts, following people in your niche with a balanced follower:following ratio and liking a load of their posts. they normally always return the favour
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
https://www.instagram.com/jackcwild
>>4395332
some of these are really good
>>4396615
ive been trying to slowly climb my way into that 10k box
best method ive found is just going through suggested accounts, following people in your niche with a balanced follower:following ratio and liking a load of their posts. they normally always return the favour
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Camera Software | Android UP1A.231005.007.G996USQSEGXK3 |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Width | 1080 |
| Image Height | 2400 |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Image Created | 2025:01:14 19:38:35 |
| Unique Image ID | 4a5cdddf-c651-4660-b5bb-c58cb84323e |
| Light Source | Unknown |
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)06:02:21 No.4399323
>>4399266
>essentially unusuable unlogged in
Resist brother. Prevent the algorithm from feeding on your juicy data
>essentially unusuable unlogged in
Resist brother. Prevent the algorithm from feeding on your juicy data
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)16:19:11 No.4399438
>>4399323
too late for that dawg i already have an account
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
too late for that dawg i already have an account
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Equipment Make | FUJIFILM |
| Camera Model | X-Pro2 |
| Camera Software | GIMP 2.10.36 |
| Maximum Lens Aperture | f/1.0 |
| Sensing Method | One-Chip Color Area |
| Focal Length (35mm Equiv) | 27 mm |
| Maker Note Version | 0130 |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Image Created | 2024:02:26 22:44:11 |
| Exposure Time | 1/2 sec |
| F-Number | f/0.0 |
| Exposure Program | Aperture Priority |
| ISO Speed Rating | 800 |
| Lens Aperture | f/1.0 |
| Brightness | -7.2 EV |
| Exposure Bias | -1 EV |
| Metering Mode | Pattern |
| Light Source | Day White Fluorescent |
| Flash | No Flash |
| Focal Length | 18.00 mm |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 3000 |
| Image Height | 2000 |
| Rendering | Normal |
| Exposure Mode | Auto |
| White Balance | Manual |
| Scene Capture Type | Standard |
| Sharpness | Normal |
| Subject Distance Range | Unknown |
| Blur Status | Blur Warning |
| Chroma Saturation | Unknown |
| Continuous/Bracketing Mode | Off |
| Auto Exposure Status | OK |
| Flash Mode | Unknown |
| Focus Mode | Manual |
| Focus Status | OK |
| Picture Mode | Aperture Prior AE |
| Sharpness | Normal |
| Slow Synchro Mode | Off |
| White Balance | Daywhite Color Fluorescence |
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)19:23:36 No.4399525
>>4399266
>or it'll wall you the second you click on a post to look at
pro tip: right click a post, open in new tab
>or it'll wall you the second you click on a post to look at
pro tip: right click a post, open in new tab
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)22:44:08 No.4399554
>>4399224
Since a lot of people are saying they can’t see Instagram posts after a certain point, here’s a couple screenshots of my posts.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Since a lot of people are saying they can’t see Instagram posts after a certain point, here’s a couple screenshots of my posts.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 216 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 216 dpi |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 1320 |
| Image Height | 2201 |
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)22:46:22 No.4399556
Anonymous 01/15/25(Wed)02:20:57 No.4399574
>>4399525
like i said, i have my own account so it doesn't affect me. but it makes ig worse as a platform for sharing.
like i said, i have my own account so it doesn't affect me. but it makes ig worse as a platform for sharing.
Anonymous 01/17/25(Fri)00:51:59 No.4399951
>>4397239
I like your shots Anon, you've got a great eye for cityscapes.
>>4397925
Always nice to see your work, it's never boring.
>>4398564
Pretty good for being new, I'll look forward to seeing more of your photos.
>>4399224
Love the winter landscapes.
>>4399316
Nice shots! I hope more people see your work.
I like your shots Anon, you've got a great eye for cityscapes.
>>4397925
Always nice to see your work, it's never boring.
>>4398564
Pretty good for being new, I'll look forward to seeing more of your photos.
>>4399224
Love the winter landscapes.
>>4399316
Nice shots! I hope more people see your work.
Anonymous 01/17/25(Fri)12:17:21 No.4400038
Untitled_realities
Urbex, feeling, melancholia, day to day life
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Urbex, feeling, melancholia, day to day life
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Camera Model | MNA-LX9 |
| Equipment Make | HUAWEI |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Width | 854 |
| Image Height | 1890 |
| Image Orientation | Unknown |
| Image Created | 2025:01:17 19:13:28 |
Anonymous 01/19/25(Sun)07:02:02 No.4400361
>>4397925
what's your set-up? fun shots.
what's your set-up? fun shots.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)02:48:04 No.4400758
>>4395314
Thanks Instagram for turning thumbnails from squares into portraits
Thanks Instagram for turning thumbnails from squares into portraits
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)06:55:45 No.4400783
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)08:10:06 No.4400792
>>4400758
this made so many people with gay profile square alignments mad af
this made so many people with gay profile square alignments mad af
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)19:10:54 No.4400977
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)19:14:54 No.4400979
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)19:36:30 No.4400981
>>4400979
I said quality, not resolution. Go upload the same photo in 1:1 and vertical, link it to me and I'll prove it to you.
I said quality, not resolution. Go upload the same photo in 1:1 and vertical, link it to me and I'll prove it to you.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)21:06:12 No.4401007
>>4400758
Where has this happened? They still show as 1:1 for me.
Where has this happened? They still show as 1:1 for me.
Anonymous 01/21/25(Tue)23:16:49 No.4401023
>>4401007
Mobile app only (so far)
Mobile app only (so far)
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)01:10:35 No.4401033
>>4401023
I use browser exclusively, so I guess I missed it. No doubt it's because they're going more toward reels and want everything to look consistent.
I use browser exclusively, so I guess I missed it. No doubt it's because they're going more toward reels and want everything to look consistent.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)01:11:38 No.4401034
>>4401033
They should give us the option
They should give us the option
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:24:43 No.4401192
just started, please be friend.
going to follow everyone in this thread.
kaidsorta
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
going to follow everyone in this thread.
kaidsorta
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Orientation | Top, Left-Hand |
| Horizontal Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Vertical Resolution | 72 dpi |
| Comment | Screenshot |
| Color Space Information | sRGB |
| Image Width | 1170 |
| Image Height | 2532 |
| Scene Capture Type | Standard |
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:26:34 No.4401194
>>4401192
Followed you back. How did you get 150+ followers if you only just started? Or did you restart?
Followed you back. How did you get 150+ followers if you only just started? Or did you restart?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:32:45 No.4401195
>>4401194
Just my personal account but never posted anything.
Just my personal account but never posted anything.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:54:25 No.4401208
New to photograph, new to instagram.
Starting to slowly follow you all, I dont wanna up upset insta's spam filter. You guys have such cool shots, I gotta step it up
https://www.instagram.com/mikez.photog
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Starting to slowly follow you all, I dont wanna up upset insta's spam filter. You guys have such cool shots, I gotta step it up
https://www.instagram.com/mikez.pho
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
| Camera-Specific Properties: | |
| Camera Software | Android TP1A.220624.014.N986USQSAHXJ1 |
| Image-Specific Properties: | |
| Image Width | 1440 |
| Image Height | 1441 |