Can you spot the guy skinning the lamb/goat?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D700
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:02:25 08:50:19
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB

Overexposed :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D700
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:02:25 05:47:29
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB

Nikocado Avocado?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3851
Image Height	2563

Holy spam
kinda based

What is he carrying?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3846
Image Height	2559

>>4394222
lunch

Fin

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3787
Image Height	2520

>>4394067 Favourite
Congratulations on the effort-post I guess?
Seems a bit pointless to go to the effort of DSLR scanning in 2025 and only ending up with 12mp though.
Your sharpening settings are really fucking up your B&Ws as well, or you've just used tragically inappropriate developer. I can see that they're massively overexposed/developed, but you should be able to reduce the grains appearance.
These shots are ok, you got close enough for the 28mm to work.
>>4394112
>>4394143
Most of the time you're in the classic wide-angle nothingburger zone though, or your perspective isn't low or straight enough; you're just pointing down at something from eye height.

Had to split up my post because muh formatting.
Then had to wait for a second 15min cooldown. Honestly fuck this gay website.
These are ok landscapes let down by poor technical quality.
>>4394100
>>4394091
>>4394111
>>4394173
GTA topdown view is neat
>>4394220
Holiday 10/10
Photos 5/10

These remind me of the pics I used to take a year after having bought my first broken film cam on ebay
As this guy said >>4394239 you have a lot of nothingburger photos, either too croped in or too wide, you probably felt a vibe when taking them but it didn't translate in the picture
I feel like you got something but aren't quite there
take you time, think about your composition etc, then snap
Ty for the post, I appreciate you

>>4394239
>nothingburger
Americans trying to get through one (1) word without thinking about making themselves obese

>>4394066
course, he's at 4

>>4394059
Some of these are really quite good. I appreciate the ones that aren't as good too, as they give a nice overall impression of the places.
Made me want to vissit Morocco in particular. You made it look like an ancient and mysterious world.

>>4394278
I never understood that word, isn't a nothingburger just a normal sandwich?

probably the best thread on /p/ for a good long while
>>4394059
>>4394063
>>4394065
>>4394067
>>4394070
really like the quoted photos
how do you go about choosing when to shoot color and when to shoot black and white?

>>4394432
>>4394082
>>4394096 shame the people are phonefags
>>4394100
>>4394143
>>4394159
>>4394160
these also belong in the liked category. spamfilter is stringent.

>>4394432
>probably the best thread on /p/ for a good long while
Absolutely

Outstanding thread.

>>4394435
travel + film is the secret photography hack
see: the MoMA

Ty frens. Can't mass reply because it thinks it's spam


>>4394432
>how do you go about choosing when to shoot color and when to shoot black and white?

I don't really know. I had B&W in the camera mostly especially if it was in the middle of the day. And in the afternoon/evening/morning id pop in a color film. Occasionally I would bring out the F100 to shoot both.

>>4394409
>Made me want to vissit Morocco in particular. You made it look like an ancient and mysterious world.

Ty. Morocco definitely feels like another world. Spent little over 2 weeks there and I don't think that was enough time.

>>4396567
And now they’re mass poisoning dogs, any dogs, including pets due to the sheer amount of strychnine on the streets, so probably best not to go back there because this is temporary and destroyed a bunch of stable, non breeding, socialized, rabies vaccinated stray packs. The point of those dogs was fighting off much worse strays. So morocco is gonna have a rabies and dog attack surge and probably a bit of social unrest over the next decade because kids who watch their properly owned pets choke on blood in the name of soccer dont grow up to be nice people.

yes they did it to look modern to visitng soccer fans and fifa approved of the whole deal

>>4394064
>>4394065
>>4394067
>>4394069
>>4394076
>>4394077
Did you use spot metering for these?
I find I seldom dare to move away from the matrix metering on film, because I'm scared of just missing a shot, but I love the deep shadows in some of these.

Many of these are the kind of photos that either make you feel like you're there or want to be there.

Based.

>>4394059
good thread

>>4396608
Yes, all of those were taken on spot.
Maybe that first one was on matrix not 100% there

>>4398718
*Sure

>>4398718
Thanks for the reply!
I'll be sure to try using spot metering more on film in the future. Those deep shadows came out great against the saturated blues.

>>4394059
This thread makes me hate all of you a little less today.
This is a good thread.

>>4394063
>>4394064
>>4394073
>>4394075
>>4394079
>>4394113
>>4394165
so good! I love these

>>4398794
Yeah, exposing for the highlights is definitely the way to go when shooting slide film.

>>4399184
Is it any different for 35mm?

>>4394115
Holy shit

>>4399038
Thank you :)

>>4399185
>Is it any different for 35mm?

Huh? Everything was shot on 35mm film.

>>4399562
Sorry, when I think of slide film, I think of those big boards of medium format film you slide in and out of a big box camera.

>>4394059
Those were not CT scanners otherwise you'd know. Those were x-ray which are somewhat safe-ish for 135 low iso film.
>>4394061
>>4394062
Any ideas about those scratches 'telegraph lines'? Do you open canister for spooling to tank reel or you just pull it by the leader? If later those were probably from shit in film canister lightseal felt.
>>4394063
On the sky often you have drying water marks, use some soft 'flo' bath, Kodak photo-flo needs 3/4 of recommended dose otherwise it's too soapy.
But other than that thanks for based thread
I also admire how you had resilience to visit so many places, many of them shitholes in one month, wouldn't do it if I was paid.

Honestly really nice work Anon. There are some great shots here, as well as some pretty generic vacation snapshits.
Best thread in a while, I hope you post more sometime when you go on vacation again.

>>4399952
Thank you anon

>>4399591
Yeah I was wondering why I got those lines. You're right, it was probably something in the light seal felt

>>4399581
Lol yeah I can see the reasoning. Slide film is just color positive film. Colors are beautiful but there's little dynamic range. It's recommended you expose for the highlights which will give you very dark shadows.

>>4400236
>slide film
I learned something today
Thank you

>>4400237
4x5 and 8x10 &cet. single frame film sheets are called sheet film.