delta smelt worth saving?
Anonymous 01/12/25(Sun)16:28:14 | 5 comments
im curious what /out/'s stance on delta smelt and trying to maintain biodiversity in californias water ways?

seems like the argument is that the smelt is not worth the hinderance to growing food or the inconvenience of rationing water in an urban setting. ya/na?

and isnt the argicultural issue that they would no longer be able to flood fields for cheap food and have to use drip irrigation which would be more labor intensive? (meaningful jobs growing more food)
Anonymous 01/12/25(Sun)16:39:44 No.2799699
>>2799697
I think we need to step back from consuming the ecosystem. Sure, it's sad what happened to people's homes in California but they shouldn't have been there in the first place:
>Overpopulating an area with very limited water supply
>Building on hillsides covered in chaparral that has natural wildfires
So my take is remove the city, not the wildlife. Shouldn't be a controversial stance for /out/
Anonymous 01/13/25(Mon)17:45:40 No.2799892
If Gavin Newsom and the politicians that run
California prefer to protect the Delta Smelt at the expense of the regular California resident it really does not impact me.
If the residents of California tolerate it why should it bother me ?
Are they helpless ? Do they need flyover rednecks to come save them ?
Californians need to unfuck themselves and their politicians.

No we will not be Climate Change Sensitive in redneckistan because you say you suffer the impact. Unfuck yourselves.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB85RY2Xk_U
Anonymous 01/14/25(Tue)00:45:53 No.2799947
bump
Anonymous 01/16/25(Thu)13:45:47 No.2800374
bump
Anonymous 01/16/25(Thu)14:04:16 No.2800375
bump