>>455490
>/fit/ 131
absolute dogshit and I can say this with confidence as a /fit/poster
board is unbearable in its current state

124

>/3/ 127
lol, lmao even

If someone actually worked 6 months on this and it's not bait then that person is all levels of mentally unwell

>>/wg/
:')

>>455490
I have interacted with people here for a while now.
believe me. we do not reach 120 iq.
we are exactly average at best. (which doesn't mean there not to be dumber boards)

>>455490
LMAO /sci is filled with vaxxers and climate cultists, all of them retarded AF.

>>455490
and how exactly do you know the IQ of the people visiting the board retard?

>>455490
how the fuck did someone even test this

>>456033
you're telling me you believe this to be real?

>>455627
And you deny science, the foundation of everything that is, you deny basic laws of physics, how CO2 affects the atmosphere and you put others at danger for not getting vaccinated against a potentially deadly virus.

>>456033
>doesn't read the top-right part of the image
The IQ of this place has truly fallen.
Then again, it's not like 4chan to be good with UI.

>>455490
considering the perceived IQ of most other anons, that means I must be a mastermind for the average to be that high

>>455490
What year was this done? I think now it's at least -20 off all those numbers.

136 last time I checked

>>455627
To understand why you're struggling with this revelation see the attached image.

>>457042
same! I checked maybe 2 years ago.
but I don't really know what to make of it.

>>455490
Me in the double digit clun

>>457077
kek

>>455490
goddamn pride flag

>>457077
>just barely above the IQ of some Balkan states
>way below the Amerimutt and most Western European scores
Couldn't have happened to a better board.

>>455490
>147 IQ on AVERAGE
Thats some fucking bullshit right there goddam.
Either that or the people that put that together were all retarded.
>dont argue against muh graph bc...... JUST DONT DO IT OK??????
Oh. So they were just retarded. Good to know.

>>457410
>Didn't read the small print at the top
There's probably some people carrying the IQ average of this board, but it probably isn't you.

>>457471
>concede your point if talking to someone more intellectually privileged than yourself
As a matter of fact, (you) didn't read the small print.
Besides,
>double-blind cross referenced
Not a thing.
Oh wait, its an inside joke. My mistake, my mistake.
>board they visited the most
>board
>visited the most
???
Yeah, nice methodology retards, put that on your research paper and upload it to r/Scholar.

where is PW

>>457516
I was about to ask the same thing

>>457516
Their IQ is 92.

Pretty smart!

>>455490
Proven fake, /pol/ is over 170 IQ (average)

>>455490
based and wallpaper pilled

>>455490
>sci 141
HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>455490
>/mlp/ negligible
The anons on that board could not diverge more. Most of them are definitely in that low range, but they are ruled by an elite class of frighteningly intelligent horsefuckers.
Also, how was this test taken?

Reminder that you can't check your own IQ. You have to have a test administered by a psychologist, online tests mean nothing because they do not cover many harder categories.
My IQ is 147 btw (checked by a psychologist when I was there for a diagnosis for something else).
Also IQ is a bullshit number and completely worthless and everyone on this website is a retard including myself.

>>459281
Insists IQ is bullshit but drops that they have a high one. Many such cases.

>>459284
It's how I know IQ is bullshit, I barely passed highschool and am struggling through a diploma course because I can't bring myself to actually do any work.

>>455490
Why is this graph so shit?

>>455490
IQ is a fake invention in which the public has believed and continues to do so. It's pseudo science. And, by the way, I post on always every board possible regularly.

Here's the secret to doing well on an IQ test: Look up what logic gates are and what they look like (AND gates, OR, XOR etc). They're designed with the assumption that you don't know what they are.

>>459341
Tell me exactly how this comes up in the working memory sections.

>>455490
>/g/
It's definitely much lower now.