I want less lithium ion batteries in my life, not more. Least of all having one strapped to my wrist.

if it's good enough for osama

I stopped wearing mine and just wear ali express watches now

10 years ago, I would have been excited for the idea of an e-paper watch with a useful SDK but that shit never happened and now watches as a whole are a dead product category, they're not even fashionable anymore when your phone has the time and all your notifications.
There's a reason all smartwatches now try to sell you on health tracking BS, nobody would buy them otherwise.

>>103976271
The point of watches is jewelry now

just get a normal watch

>>103976287
they're not even good jewelry, watches in general have ballooned in size, a mens watch from the 60s would be considered womens size now.

I like my dumbwatch. It lasts 2 days.

this >>103976305
Last 1 one year without having to worry about muh battery.

>>103976150
>mine lasts 10 days minimum
I use my smartwatch to track my running and workouts. It lasts 2 days with all spyware and sensors on.
On "watch only" mode it lasts for 28 days.
To be honest I don't really care about it's battery. Every day I put it to charge when I shower and that's enough.

>>103976175
Got one of these bad bois when I switched to a flip phone a few years back

Progress is a myth. The watch was perfected here

>>103976309
They're going back and actually started to downsize most luxury brands now offer smaller dials under 40mm now

>>103976309
In the last few years, to placate manlets, the trend has gone to 36mm and 38mm becoming a standard offering. If I were to list them by size it would be;
XS - 36mm
S - 38mm
M - 40mm
L - 42mm
XL - 44mm
XXL 46mm

I have a normal wrist size of 7.25" and I max out at 44mm with 38mm looking small and 40mm looking perfect with no lug overhang even on something like an intramatic. Average male wrists are 6.5"-7.5". Now if you're talking about how popular divers are I agree with you, I'm sick of the fat fuck looking watches being popular.

>>103976461
Nah, the gshock 5000 series is better since it doesn't look like it came out of a gumball machine

>>103976150
No

I used to wear watches but then i got a nickel allergy, now all chinesium continously contacting my skin will make my skin turn red, ooze and weep liquid basically nonstop, I got it from my previous pair of glasses and even a belt.

>>103976662
Just get a gold plated watch

Watches have completely fallen out of fashion for anything less than formal wear.

>>103976662
Stainless steel always has nickel. 316 is like 10% nickel.

>>103976670
Most gold plated watches will still have a steel caseback. You would want to go for one with a brass/bronze case and then you would still have to look for one without a steel caseback. Even one with a sapphire/mineral glass caseback will usually have a stainless steel bezel. Brass should just be copper and zinc, bronze copper and tin.

>>103976728
You could plate the caseback yourself with a simple salt brine and an anode actually.

>>103976150
I love it so much bros. Even got compliments for it at work. I don't care that the Chinese are spying on me whilst im wearing it, as long as I look good

>>103976958
Forgot pic

>>103976150
why do you shave faggot?

>>103976150
I only care about smartwatches if they can sustain a charge for well over a week AND have their time ALWAYS up. Most AMOLEDS fall well short of this, and MIPs are becoming increasingly rare.
So I just wear a regular wristwatch.

>>103976964
Bro that is too big for you

>>103977456
This is how a watch should look proportionally to a wrist

>>103976150
Imagine if you had a technology that would track people 24/7 and was attached to their body at all times (they'd be encouraged to do this even when they wouldn't normally wear a watch by making up some BS 'fitness goal streaks')

You could even make them even more invasive than what we subject prisoners to (as those have rights they are aware of), since for the criminal, we only know where they are right now, but for these people?

We could monitor their heart rate during the time they're reading an article to know their secret thoughts and feelings they don't even dare articulate in private. We could detect hidden health conditions and sell the data to health insure to make sure they can drop the problematic customers.

We could even psyop them into buying the new one every year, and using it as a status symbol?

But people surely wouldn't be that stupid, would they?

>>103976964
lug to lug length?

>>103976175
>>103976637
I like the knockoffs that just have less autistic writing all over them

>>103976150
>Does /g/ like smartwatches?
Sure.
Mods don't however, expect this thread to be killed. My last attempts on tech discussions were not appreciated.

Gave it a new strap

>>103977115
The huawei GT line can go up to 14 days without Aod and shit

>>103976983
My bf doesn't like when im hairy

>>103978294
Fair I don't like it when my bf is hairy either

>>103976150
I like mine fine, it's more of a fitness tracker though.
I can't justify the more expensive ones, I don't think they're good value at all.

>>103976150
No. Just use a regular fucking watch faggot.
>mine lasts 10 days!!!
What? I have a Casio that essentially lasts forever. Are you retarded?

>>103978342
Only kids and terrorists wear casios. Also, bitches won't find you attractive if you wear a dookie looking watch.

>>103978674
Add it to the chair

i hate technology

Pretty happy with mine.

i keep getting the urge to start wearing watches but as soon as i start looking, i get too autistic about what i like and dislike and just close the tab. there's basically nothing that i really like out there.

>>103976420
Ugly

I don't want a watch but I kind of want to mod a smartphone with a physical keyboard into some kind of wearable wrist computer

>>103978608
This is the casio duro. It's considered the best beater watch among enthusiasts. It runs $50-60.

>>103979538
I felt like this, so I built my own watch. It's not perfect, because nobody makes some of the parts I want, like a ceramic bezel insert with full minute markings in the size that fits my bezel, but it's about as close as I'm going to get without a full custom build, and it's about 90% of the way there, while the closest real watch I could get would be about 70% at best in terms of looks, and maybe 50% in terms of materials and weight.

>>103979538
Here's an ali express watch list, just wait for a sale. An nh3x means a seiko automatic movement. An st means a seagull mechanicsl movement. Vk63 is a seiko mechaquartz. All of these have sapphire crystal and ar coating. All of these are a better deal than just a seiko 5.

$130 - sugess panda st19 chronograph
$55 - addiesdive field watch nh35
$130 - seestern doxa diver nh35
$55 - seestern nomos st1701
$140 - san martin tudor gmt nh34
$60 - Pagani speedy VK63
$250 - san martin original design root beer gmt nh34 beads of rice bracelet
$150 - baltany khaki aviation nh38
$55 - tandorio laco flieger nh35
$56 - tandorio murph nh35
$120 - boderry voyager bronze/titanium nato field watch nh35

>>103980246
Forgot pic. The big issue with this is it is 44mm so you can't have a small wrist.

I don't like spyware, so I wear a proper watch.

>>103976271
>I would have been excited for the idea of an e-paper watch
Why? Because e-ink was new and whiz-bang? Good contrast for daytime visibility, unreadable in the dark. And monochrome... text messages I guess? Do you really need to read a text on your wrist? Thats why it was never made, that'd be a stupid watch.

>>103980304
I don't care about a "good deal". I literally just don't like the look of anything you posted.

>>103976271
The only good smartwatch came out well before e-ink, it used a dot matrix display and had a battery life of about 2 years, which wasn't great. There was nothing wrong with LCD in the first place, the power drain is the CPU, which only manages 2 years in the simplified time only mode. If you switch it to the real time mode so you can play tetris on the shitter, it lasts about 2 months.

>>103980448
If you don't, which you didn't look, then you just don't like watches at all. Almost all of these are copies of quintessential designs.

>>103980483
Pretty much all of those "quintessential" designs are ugly to begin with. They're even uglier when you replace the only reason to own them, the gay name on the logo, with some gibberish non-brand like "san martin".

I'm not him, but there's legitimately like 2 watches ever made I liked the look of, and they're both over 30 years old at this point.

>>103980530
Let's see your two super duper old watches from 1995 and before.

>>103976150
mine lasts for fucking years, but it is not "smart", hahahahaha

Amazing. Last time I had a watch, its battery would last literal years. Because it told time. It did nothing but tell time. Because it's a watch.

Why can't this ipa boy make more of these

>>103980550
One of them I actually only liked for the bezel, the rest of the watch wasn't that great. This is the only mass produced watch I'd like to actually own and wear. Even then, it's not like it's a perfect watch. Those bezels aren't great (both in terms of clicks and the shitty aluminium inserts), I prefer a different day display, and those old Seiko bracelets are cheap junk.

But still, if I had to wear a fully genuine watch, I'd buy this. Luckily, I live in the modern day, where I built a watch with better parts throughout (aside from being automatic, which is a downgrade) for less than it'd cost for a mediocre example of this watch today.

The thing with beauty is that it's pretty subjective. Just because lots of faggots think the moonwatch is the coolest thing ever, that doesn't mean I'll think it even looks wearable.

>>103980673
So you like the old cheap watch trend like the prx. where did you buy the case, dial, and movement, and how did you avoid submariner shit. I have a cheap seiko digital from 1981 with the really thin bracelet and case body. You can find a ton of rolex build kit parts but then you'd have a fatass rolex chunky look. I hate bracelets in general desu

>>103980483
I did look and I don't like them. Why is that so hard to believe? Maybe I just don't like "quintessential designs"? I'm into the idea of wearing a time thing around my wrist, I'm just picky as to what I (don't) want it to look like. Pic related is an example of the *precise* thing that I like in that category, while many of the very similar designs are a hard pass for me for one reason or another. In other categories I again have very specific but different things that I like and dislike.

>>103980881
whoops le picrel

>>103980893
My brain auto filters the entire plain dress watch category because of how boring they are. I wouldn't even collect their names or prices if I saw them.

>>103980954
>I wouldn't even collect their names or prices if I saw them.
What did he mean by this? Some pretentious way of saying "this type of product does not appeal to me"?

>>103980849
I like thinner watches, but my watch isn't thin. Nobody makes the kind of cases I'd want for that anymore, and the custom market is built around auto movements, which are thicker to begin with. My current watch is 11.7mm thick, which required some custom modification to both the bezel and the caseback, as stock I think this watch case is about 13.5mm, so I took almost 2mm off it, but it's still a far cry from the 9mm of those old quartz models.

As for the parts, I got pretty much everything off aliexpress aside from the bracelet, which is an uncle seiko Z199 (also heavily modded), and the sapphire, which was cheaper locally. Movements are easy to find if you're sticking to companies like Seiko who don't jew their customers by only selling replacement movements to "authorised repair centers", but they will tend to be bulky. Dial quality can vary, and it's one of the few areas where OEM stuff really tends to be a lot better than what you can build, but the style of dial I wanted is unpopular to begin with so I couldn't even find an OEM dial I'd like to start with, especially with a day/date window.

If you're into simpler cases without bezels and dials without windows, you might be able to get some closer to what you want, and if you don't like bracelets then straps tend to be far easier to deal with. I can't live without a good steel bracelet personally.

>>103981124
I have been compiling lists of watches to reccomend people based on their price category but I don't even think about extremely plain dress watches. The dress watches I would get are ones that have a pre-1950s look and usually with a moonphase. Otherwise you have the modern dress watches with the crazy textured dials. But the plain style exists in a middle ground without either the fun insouciant look of the modern ones or the grandpa likes features of a moonphase.

>>103981178
You can get a sw200 for like $200 that would be thinner than an nh35. 4.6mm vs 5.3mm. But you're probably looking at the eta 7001 2.5mm and angry at swatch. If you're already into machine work what you could do is buy a small cnc router and mill whatever case design you want. Just pirate solid works. Sounds like you already do a lot of dremel work. Yeah I despise bracelets and take them off immediately and use rubber and leather quick release straps and swap them constantly. I do like a milanese on the right watch.

My seiko from 1981 is tiny and thin and a lot of the parts appear stamped which is how the flat bodies of the whole cheap vintage trend like the prx look.

>>103981357
>You can get a sw200 for like $200
Yeah, but my NH36 offers day as well as date, which is a must for me. And it was only 30 bucks, so I can buy half a dozen replacements of it when the lube starts running dry. Ultimately, it'd only be a saving of a little over half a mm, for a nice thickness level you really have to go quartz.

>what you could do is buy a small cnc router and mill whatever case design you want
While I could do this, it'd be a significant expense for something with enough accuracy, and all my case work was simple hand stuff, it's not hard to make something already flat thinner with some abrasives and then polish them.

>>103976150
Xiaomi smart bands last 18 days

>>103981503
But think of all the prototypes you could make

>>103982381
I would get into this because I have cnc and laser engraving and solid works experience. But I worked with wood and plastics not metals. A small one would be fucking sick to just machine watch cases out of blocks of 316. But then you would need a tap for the caseback which are fucking tiny threads. You have to respect how good the chinese have gotten at machining in terms of quality at the speed they have done so. Especially brands like san martin that destroy the machinework of most brands under $4000.

>>103976637
>pressure rated to 20bar
Hate this shit. How the fuck am I supposed to know what the pressure I'm diving at is?

>>103985437
If you were a diver you'd know approximate depts and pressures so you don't die. That rating is for a limited amount of time as well. And as the o-rings dry through aging or if you take the back plate off, you change up the rating as well, but nobody would test a $150 digital watch after swapping the battery.

>>103976420
Nice band, perfect fit for an evening in a farm themed steakhouse.

>>103976150
Smartwatches are cringe. Just use your phone at that point unless you need to track activities we all know /g/ay fatsoes don't do. If you want a watch get a automatic. Mechanical is peak tech.

>>103985518
Or you could put the depth in fathoms like actual divers use and they won't have to use dead reckoning based on how much their ears hurt

For me, it's Rangeman

>>103985773
>put the depth in fathoms like actual divers use
Divers don't use fathoms for depth.

>>103985894
The divers that matter do.

>>103986061
Do you really think divers convert fathoms to meters then recall depth pressures based on meters?

>>103976150
I have an automatic watch, lasts forever

>>103986125
Why convert to metres at all? Depth charts are all in fathoms.

>>103985437
10 meters depth = 1 bar of pressure. Add 1 for air pressure if it's absolute and not gauge. Recreational divers are restricted to 200 feet depth = about 8 bar absolute. The deepest dive ever without a hardsuit was 530 meters = 54 bar absolute.

>>103976150
No, smart watches are only useful as a professional athlete. Otherwise they're display pieces and curiosities, and the screen is a bit gauche

>>103986186
Until it needs a servicing in 5-10 years for $100-500 depending on complications. Unless you have a seiko or miyota movement and can just plop a new one into it for $40.

haven't charged my watch in 3 years. btw, is there a smartwatch with solar cells to keep it charged when you're out in the sun?

>>103980304
Do you mean they're literally the same mechanisms, like taken from the same factories or something?

>>103986125
>meters
Do you realize how unamerican you sound right now, pal?

>>103987451
Brother, I don't even know how big a meter is. But as >>103986272 pointed out, BAR is a metric nonsense measurement where its just super convenient. How do you know when you've gotten 10 meters or 1 bar down in the ocean? Who the fuck knows but I assume divers do because its a matter of life or death.

Those european ass clowns made up some nonsense like a "metre" and a "BAR" and because its base 10 everyone thinks its good shit. Whereas if we came up with 100 feet = 1 heavywater, they'd be furious with us.

>>103976150
no.
>>103976179
Same.

>>103987067
yeah, usually have Solar in the description tags.
>>103987562

>>103979351
Forgot my Temu $3 watch. Fuck logos unless they are paying me to wear their shit.

>>103976175
Based

>>103976150
i use an apple watch ultra. useful for sleep and fitness tracking, but i wouldn't recommend it for anything else.
apparently the garmins are better, but there are a lot of models to choose from.

>>103987268
Yes, the nh34, nh35, nh38, vk68, etc. Avoid the miyota 8215 because it doesn't even have hacking. An example of the chink version being better would be laco. Laco makes a flieger for $400 that uses the miyota 8215 while the tandorio that is $55 uses the nh35. Laco also has an eta movement option for ~$1000 which is made by swatch group. Eta and sellita are the top swiss watch movement manufacturers and they're in most high end watches unless the movement is built in house like omega or rolex. Omega is owned by swatch but their chronograph movements are in house. But swatch brands like hamilton are just etas with a different name. The vast majority of watch makers are like automobile carriage makers where they do bodywork but the engine and chassis underneath are bought in. Miyota is owned by citizen and their movements are the second most common cheap automatic movemenrs to seiko but they're worse at the pricepoint. Seiko 5 series used to be the recommended starter watch abouf 10 years ago but they're a horrible value for money now. Their glass is a mineral glass+ and their dials and cases are all cheap and shitty looking. The best value watches under $500 are all chink watches now.

>>103987619
>Forgot my Temu $3 watch. Fuck logos unless they are paying me to wear their shit.
Based.

>>103987787
thank you based horologist scholar

>>103976150
yes i like my forerunner 955

>>103987546
1 bar is 100 kPa, 1 atmosphere is nominally about 101 kPa, and 10 meters of water column is about 103 kPa. None of them are defined in terms of another, they just happen to be very close to each other out of crazy random happenstance.

Are there any smartwatches that allow you to add your own custom background? (picrel I want an image like this on my watch)

I bought this watch two weeks ago and I quite like it.
I find it a bit large (43 mm), but I have wide wrists so at least it doesn't look weird.

One plus watch 2 is one of the best low profile smartwatches especially when it has a silver body

>>103988222
Good watch but I'd swap the bands

>>103990402
It's like $40, just wait a couple months for the strap to fall apart before buying another one. You'll spend more on a good leather strap than the watch costs.

>>103976150
I use them

>>103990402
I actually bought a new leather band after like three days. The original looked good, but it wasn't comfortable at all. It's some sort of canvas so there was no stretching at all, so it was either just a little too small or just a litle too loose.

>>103976150
>Mine lasts 10 days minimum
Mine lasts 10 years minimum

>>103991066
Hey, what happened to that /g/ telegram group?
Is there another one or guys went to another place?

>>103988070
Literally all of them

>>103976171
What part of "safe and effective" don't you understand, chud?

>>103992055
Eco drive?

I really like this cereal box watch. I don't give a shit about tech usually but this is just a really good product, thought out ui, lots of utility, great battery life (around a month)
Best feature is, you click a button and it sets the time for whatever location you're in. Landed in a foreign country? Np just hit a button and you have the local time precise to a millisecond. That's just the coolest feature a watch could possibly have.

>>103988222
I have this watch. It's good. 1/20s chrono, Indiglo, calender works, jumping hour hand, and it's way quieter than I expected from a Timex watch. I just wish Timex lumed the minute hand too instead of just the hour hand.

>>103994958
Do I have to connect it to my phone? I just want a standalone pedometer/heart rate monitor watch with calories burned based on steps and heart rate. Just keep a 7 day log.

>>103976637
>muh g-schlock
If you actually use your watch it's not that great compared to say a Timex Ironman which has a better layout and UX.

But it is tough as nails, which is what it set out to be. They're just over-saturated at this point, too many people jerking off over G-Shocks.

Also pic-rel is a great alternative if people could look beyond the name "Casio"

>>103995883
If you want frutiger aero tier rounded everything

>>103977989
>less autistic writing all over them
You haven't even begun to see the depths of autism that Casio has plunged to.

>>103995907
C'mon man you could have chosen a better example than the circa 2000 era design, I actually like picrel for instance
>I still remember the cars and CD players that had that bubble aesthetic too

And they say the 80's was bad. Yeesh.

>>103995934
Based. Combine this with some oakleys.

>>103995955
You do have to admit the resin looks cheaper and the silver paint is happy meal tier and always skuffed off immediately.

>>103995965
Yeah, my argument was over functionality more than anything.

I will say the pictures they use are horrendous, it's only a $40 watch but it looks much better IRL than what they show. The colors are way off and it doesn't look quite so "soft"

>>103995956
No, I don't wanna go back...

>>103996031
You need to complete the look with some otomix workout pants, a tanktop, metallic silver track jacket, and some air command force sneakers.

>>103995797
You don't but the garmin app is pretty good imo. I have all phone notifications turned off so it doesn't buzz on my wrist.

I just use a Casio
>Cheap
>Don't have to charge it, it will last several years til you need new battery
>Can take damage fine
>Don't even care if it gets damaged
>Don't care if it gets wet
>Time is always there for me, don't have to wait for the screen to turn on or keep shaking my arm to turn it and look like an idiot in public
>Don't blind my eyes looking at it in the dark

>>103976964
fuckhuge watch

>>103996430
How big is it though? 52mm?

>>103992733
i don't think anything happened to it

>>103987619
These are pieces of shit though. The dropshipping companies that mark them up to $300 are just for absolute fucking retards

>>103996525
Can you send the invite link? Maybe i quit accidentally. Wouldn't be banned never had any problem there.

>>103976605
>t.
36mm is a normal watch size for the average (non-obese) man

>Ctrl+F Pebble
>0 results
I used to post my musings that only Pebble got smartwatches right, but apparently that's not what people thought and the company is kill for 8 years now. Too bad. I would like my Time Steel to get better, namely get bigger screen and a crown for scrolling messages. At least mine is still alive, Gadgetbridge still works, Rebble still works for people who prefer original app.
I tried Tizen, Android smartwatches and it just ain't right when I feel like I need to care for my watch. Pebble always knew its place, that it's a tertiary device (after your computer and phone), and it should just werk. I'm disappointed that this wasn't appreciated by enough normal people to keep the company alive.

>>103997888
This is a 39mm watch. To me the lugs should be just a bit wider.

>>103997903 (Me)
You know, it's those little things that one could say were limitations, were the strength of these watches. No OLED? Transreflective display is excellent in sunlight, and the full panel backlight (with meh contrast, mind you) activated on shake of wrist turned out to be an essential feature for a quick light at night. I used the flashlight feature on Pixel Watch and it was funny that something that Pebble did with a wrist flick needed 2 hands to click to on Pixel. I also liked that the backlight turns off after a few seconds so if it enables itself unprompted, I don't need to think about it because it's just for a few hours. I did like that on Pixel I only needed to place my palm on the screen to go back home = turn flashlight off, but you know, still something to remember to do. Yes, tiny, but you get the idea.
On the other hand crown was pretty handy on Pixel, really wish that Pebble had that. I'm not educated in hardware dev so I don't see myself doing a DIY Pebble software compatible project that would bring to reality what Time 2 could have been. But damn, if there was such project, I would fucking commit to building it for myself, given good documentation etc.
I really like that seemingly forgotten concept of watches design to be smart first (C SDK available), but also to know when to stay dumb.

>>103997903
>Ctrl + F
>Watchy
>0 results

If /g/ has a watch it's Watchy
>open source hw & sw
>e-ink cause that's different and different = better
>esoteric enough only other l33t hackers will get it

>>103986354
Idk, I haven't had to service this watch in 15 years, and it's been my daily driver for like 8 of those years

>>103998887
Your milage may vary especially by activity level

>>103998703
my neopussy rn

they're great if you don't mind taking them off for charging, regular watches are also great but they're just a fashion accessory, no different from earrings or a necklace

smart watches are a tool that also can be a fashion accessory

>>103976150
Smartwatches glow.
Wake me up when there's an open source smartwatch where I can code my own bullshit.

what is the actual usecase of the smartwatch?
will they ever become more than pedometers?
i don't need a watch to tell me if I have walked enough or not, because I know what I did during the day.

>>103999660
Some can be a decent health monitor with the sleep, heart irregularities, etc. Pedometers are actually useful too if you're trying to move away from a sedentary lifestyle. They tell the time and show phone notifications without reaching into your pocket.
They're also just another gadget, which is a value in itself for people who like that kind of stuff.

>>103999409
>TIL anons don't actually read the thread
I'm shocked

>>103999660
I like when my watch told me I walked 26 miles in a day

>>103999849
>TIL
Lurk moar.

>>103999307
I hate zoomers so much it's unreal.

watches are for dorks that need to larp as "adults"

Insufferable

>>103999746
notifications seem like the only useful feature.
I don't see myself actually gaining much value from the statistics, as I either decide to live healthier or not, I don't need an expensive gadget to tell me that, what I already know and feel.
And telling time and date is not specific to the smart watch.
>>103999855
but I already know that happened, I was there when it did.

>>104000385
Cool story bro

>>104000444
Were you walking in circles on a track?

>>104000385
Or you just like having non-gay jewelry

I love it as well, last update pretty much solved all the little nitpicks I had with it

>>104002704
which watch is this

>>104003000
Huawei GT 5

>>104003106
thanks might research it, i like the look of it and the info it has on that face

>>104003000
It's a Huawei GT4 with an AliExpress elastic steel strap, love it, great battery life, a simple strap swap changes the watch style, great cycling tracking, I'm totally satisfied with it.
Should get the recently launched GT5, guess it's pretty much the same.

>>103999218
Ngmi, women dont care about watches to begin with

>>104003341
Based GTbro.
>>103988070
All smartwatches are essentially watered down phones running their own version of android.

>radio time-signal
>solar-powered (replace rechargable cell every 10+ years)
>time-of-day, day-of-week, day-of-month (mostly missing: month-of-year, year)
>[mostly] analog display

Things I wish it had:
- a backlight
- hourly chimes
- moonphase

Random:
- Count-down timer is particularly easy to set and use

>>103976150
>buys a portable screen
>just to display the same watch an analog would do
For the record, my dumbwatch lasts more than a year before I need to change the battery
>B-but I can recieve calls and notifications...
You have a phone for that

>>103976420
That a Raketa Copernic? Good taste

>>103987546
You are not special for using feet muttbro, even less when all your measurements are now defined in relation to the metric system. The bar is just conveniently close to the atm measurement and the kPa as another anon previously said

>>103976150
I have one, a samsung one. The sync app for they require to run on your phone eats battery like crazy. Uninstalled it and went from 3-4 days of battery back up to what looks to be 5-7 days. Now I just use my mechanical self winding watches again. Have a 24 hour one and like it quite a bit.