Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:53:09 | 22 comments | 4 images
20250120_073620
Thoughts on aerosolized duck fat?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:54:20 No.21124279
>>21124277
i don't see the point
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)15:55:16 No.21124281
>>21124277
i don't understand aerosolized anything desu. Except feembraps of course, were this possible.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:15:59 No.21124308
cHNFGTGStk94fDLmEJpB-oloibsLSL-af1m80clO23s
>>21124277
isn't duck fat solid at room temperature (aka not a oil)?
what's next, aerosolized butter? spray tallow?
unless it's just duck flavored vegetable oil or something like that.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:53:05 No.21124349
Check the ingredients, since it's probably mostly oil like >>21124308 said
If it's well and truly just fat of the honk then it's worth trying once.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:56:04 No.21124354
>>21124277
>$7.34 for fucking bacon grease
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)16:57:07 No.21124355
duck-fat-spray-exists-v0-oi9wkd0vd6yb1
>ingredients: duck fat
>total fat 0
>calories 0
what the fuck is this sorcery?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:05:28 No.21124372
>>21124355
>1/4 second spray
just a spritz goyim
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:06:08 No.21124374
>>21124355
0.25g of duck fat is in fact 0 on everything. But you're not spraying 0.25g of duck fat, it's gonna be upwards of 4-5g will have a decent amount. If my calorimeter didn't break last month I'd go find the same can and give you an accurate measure for a longer spray.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:13:18 No.21124385
>>21124374
0.25 grams of fat is a ridiculously small portion, but it's still 2.25 calories, not 0.
that's a pretty misleading label to say the least
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:17:49 No.21124392
>>21124385
if the calories are less than like 5 per serving they're legally allowed to say it's 0 calories. pretty sure all cooking oil sprays say 0 calories because the serving size is 1 molecule
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:18:53 No.21124396
>>21124355
>.25g serving
This just means they don't have to write what's actually in it, doesn't it?
also
>trans fat
nasty shit, op
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:23:14 No.21124407
>>21124392
it's still bullshit, that's why they chose a serving size of an ant's booger.
How many people will read the label and think "hey, it's calorie free, I can use it as much as I want!"
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:24:01 No.21124410
>>21124355
same reason why tictacs are 0 sugar despite being all sugar
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:26:16 No.21124417
>>21124374
>0.25g of duck fat is in fact 0 on everything.
No it isn't. The fat and calories are simply below the threshold required for reporting due to the small serving size.
>>21124407
It's those people's own fault for thinking something labelled "duck fat" has 0 fat and 0 calories.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:34:26 No.21124435
>>21124355
>servings per container 792
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:35:12 No.21124438
>>21124281
what's feembrap? is it like pam?
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:35:47 No.21124440
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:36:25 No.21124441
>>21124435
You're supposed to use it like an inhaler
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)17:50:30 No.21124472
51TUzsChGIL._AC_SL1500_
>>21124435
1 grams of oil is slightly more than 1 ml.
that means the suggested serving size is 1/4 of this syringe
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:07:26 No.21124509
>>21124355
That's why you need the European labels which show ingredients by gram per 100 g. No rounding, no fraud.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)18:46:57 No.21124601
>>21124277
It's really good at soothing my niece's budding breasts.
Anonymous 01/22/25(Wed)19:00:04 No.21124635
>>21124601
Your adult nephew will never be a woman.