>>4921254
I'm still alive so no

>>4921254
those monke human hybrids kinda freak me out. Did they talk and wear clothes and shit and build like simple tents and structures or were they pretty much monke?

>>4921254
Every time I see a reconstruction of erectus, it gets less ape-like
>>4921295
Talking (at least in the same way we know it) probably wasn't a thing if you weren't at least part of the homo genus, but I could be wrong. All of these guys probably had complex "languages" of gestures and simple vocalizations.

I'd fuck a neanderthal

Homo erectus looks like the giant cockroach men from that one anime

>>4921254
maybe a little bit. I mean, the reason a portion of the population still has neanderthal DNA is because some of our sapien ancestors either had neanderthal mates from a tribal union/peace deal or captured from a raid, so other homonids were either too primitive to consider worthy of fucking, or too far away genetically to hybridize.
Then again, given the two examples we have of our more basal ancestors (abos and tribal africans), it's entirely possible they were just too fucking stupid to survive.
>saw another ape man from the tall hill clan get killed last sun
>let me guess - Giant sloth?
>of course giant sloth. I have no idea WHY tall hill clanners insist on trying to fuck them but they just dont stop. Worst part? He was still tucking his guts back into himself and howling for Mother Night to grant him the long sleep when a SECOND ONE GRABBED ONTO THE BACK OF THE SLOTH.
>fucking niggers. unbelievable.
>niggers? what's that?
>I...dont know. it just came out. felt right.

>>4921373
Well, aside from neanderthals (which everyone outside of Africa has some ancestry from), some humans admixed with other groups. Australian abos and related peoples north of them are like 4 to 5% denisovian, and SEA have trace amounts of denisovian DNA. In Africa DNA tests have show a couple different admixture events with archaic hominids among different groups. West Africans have sizable amounts of DNA from these ghost hominids.

>>4921402
Do we know what this mystery archaic hominin is? Maybe homo naledi?

>>4921402
well, there ya go. some we probably fucked, some we probably killed and ate because they didn't ping the pattern recognition software as "person" close enough, with different groups having different experiences.
floresiensis for example probably got the shit rocked out of them in the worst way just because literally any other hominid they came across could just pick them up by their ankles and smash them into a rock.

>>4921254
>did other human species die out from being total uggos?

The kind of animal we are has (mostly) sexually selected for cuteness, smartness, and big dicks & big tits, so probably.
We're also a lot more comfortable with non-violent solutions to choosing and picking mates: our social systems are extremely complicated, we can actually talk about our feelings, understanding is possible between people in a way it isn't between other animals, and most cultures (historically) didn't completely ignore the desires of women.
There's a hypothesis that Australian Aborigines are so fucking ugly because they possessed zero, or minimal, female sexual selection. They resolved everything via violence and so they selected for ugly stupid brutes.

>>4921295
>Did they talk and wear clothes and shit and build like simple tents and structures or were they pretty much monke?

Neanderthals, as far as we'll maybe ever know, possessed comparable intelligence to us. Neanderthals could hunt and forage a range of foods, make acorn flour, knew how to boil water, could spin twine and rope, make rock tools, they made art, wore accessories and semi-tailored clothing (they didn't just wear rags), and showed signs of religiosity. But they also suffered from intense genetic isolation & inbreeding ?for some reason?, they never socialized with dogs or other animals, and speech may have been difficult for them.
Neanderthals come off as super autistic.

Homo Erectus, Rudolfensis, and Habilis, blur the line between man and monke because they had a very limited material culture (they could make maybe 12 things and they experienced zero innovation for a million years), but then they wandered around all over the planet (tons of them across East and South East Asia), were highly expansionist, and could be perceived as the most successful Hominid species.

>>4921254
Funny you make this thread I was just talking about this the other day

I hypothesize in terms of our very recent evolution interbreeding with neanderthals ( which were males interbreeding with female hominids from Africa ) came about because their women were likely disgustingly ugly once they met the other women migrating into their lands

For anyone doubting this idea, take a good look at australian aboriginal race mixing. It is MAJORITY abbo men interbreeding with white and chinese women. Their races women are fucking ogre tier. It's too politically incorrect to point this out but if their tribe was extinct they WOULD be classified as a subhuman group by their bone characteristics alone.

Point being its extremely unlikely neanderthal women suffered some unknown reproductive issue as has been the argument for decades, its totally fucking retarded when you consider the range of their habitat. Are you telling me ALL OF THEIR WOMEN mysteriously had the same problem? I'm calling bullshit on that. Neanderthal men left their ugly cave wives for the more athletically gifted beautiful tomboys from africa and slowly the neanderthal women died out as climate change drove them into competition with their southern rivals.

>>4921477
I'd fuck a neanderthal babe

>>4921477
Dangerously based take

>>4921254
bottom middle right is just a Planet of the Apes costume from the '60s

>>4921254
I don't buy the recreations they've made of these species. Too fanciful with only educated guessing and no proof. I also think our knowledge of DNA, its sequencing, and the expression of genes is totally underwhelming and fundamentally flawed, and we can't even begin to guess what they actually looked like or how they functioned.
>>4921434
>>4921477
I tried finding old photographs of aborigine women from Australia and unless I'm just stupid there aren't very many. These are objective attraction ratings. Modern, color photos of aborigines are useless because of how many whites mixed with them. The results are interesting. The score was 44 with 12 individuals, creating an average 3.6 which I classify on the 10 scale as solidly "ugly". The problem here is the results are skewed by the cute loli and the hideous old ladies. And one woman is a real hambeast but only because she and her husband are obviously super wealthy which isn't a good indication of actual beauty. Underneath the fat and makeup, American women are beautiful too but you'd never guess it. If we had 14 to 34 year old aborigine women, who had never mixed with whites and still ate their ancestral diet, then we would have accurate results. Because this is a seemingly impossible task, I call your claims of ugly aborigine outbreeding inconclusive but likely bullshit because the women have 2-3 different phenotypes and while one of them is truly ogrish,another is actually quite cute. It also really helps that they bother to have hair. Most African women traditionally have very short ugly hair while the aborigine women grow it quite large, and the more there is the better it covers up the brows. Women without heavy nasolabial folds also really excel.

>>4921702
Did you really need to call the kid a loli?

>>4921702
>These are objective attraction ratings.
>the results are skewed by the cute loli
top kek

If I'm reporting this thread to anyone, it'll be to the normie advertisers dumb enough to spend their money here.

Just a quick email to let you know your ad is running next to a white supremacist thread on 4chan guys. Screenshots attached. Your investors and customers won't be impressed.

>>4922470
Ultimately whether you're right or wrong
4chan will get rid of you because you're evolutionarily regressive. Your opinions don't pay $$$$

and the $ wins. You lose. The $$$$ win.

>>4922470
you will never have an ethnostate

>>4922482
I am a muslim jihadist I don't care about race

>>4922485
oh in that case, your so-called prophet was a pedophile

>>4922486
Nothing wrong with that

>>4922487
well idk where you live but you try that shit where I come from you'll be skinned alive

>>4922489
I live in Foodistan and you won't do shit

>>4921373
>abos and tribal africans
You picked two races who are so genetically apart it's not even funny, why are racists like you so fucking retarded

>>4922485
واحدة حرية اشتراكيه

>>4921254
They died from being homos

I’ve been wondering, how arboreal was Australopithecus?

>>4922468
>>4922480
>>>/reddit/

>>4922485
>>4922489
THIRDIE FIGHT!!!!!!!!!

>>4921254
my ancestors :)

>>4921254
Would an ugly modern human today be considered most attractive to ancient homos?

It's because anthropology artists are just failed human artists who can't draw people without uncanny faces.

>>4921299
>Every time I see a reconstruction of erectus, it gets less ape-like
Tbf there's a massive spectrum to what erectus would've looked like, they were around for more than a million years and the late specimens had a significantly larger cranial capacity than the early ones.

>>4921254
I mean subsaharan africans still exist

>>4921477
opposite from the truth actually. incel homo sapien men went for qt 3.14 neanderthal women. the female offspring were completely fine, but the males were basically the social equivalent of hapas and were usually sterile.

>>4921254
>did other human species die out
No because abos in aussie exist

Homo sapiens are the only ones with the potential to manifest gigachad, case closed

>>4921295
There is archeological evidence that old hominids were likely cooking and building boats, but humans are the only ones capable of speech because it's a very specific feature of our throats that no other hominid has.

>>4922498
Abos are mentally retarded human dodos and africans aren't much better

>>4921254
neanderthals didn’t die out, they interbred with early humans to make hybrids that live on today

>>4922468
i wanna stab your face until it looks like hamburger regardless of whether or not you're being ironic
I would screech and scream and bite off your nose, ears, and lips if you were left alone with me.

>>4921254
At what point do you think it would be ilegal to have them in zoos?

>>4922485
B-B-BUH B-B-BUH B-BUH B-BUH
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASED

>>4922527
Maybe I was just looking at OP's pic for too long but man when I got to this jpg -- Goodall is looking good. Jane had a nice set of legs on her.

>>4921254
Frankly apes are ugly and gross us humans included. We're unaesthetic as fuck. We're programmed to ignore the awkwardness though. Part of the disgust many have for other apes is seeing the ridiculous design for what it is, without our narcissistic bias and the human filter over our eyes/brains to prevent us from not breeding.
>no tails
>no snouts
>no horns, spikes, fur, scales, scutes, feathers or antlers.
We're the worst branch of the already troubled branch of synapsids. Really the least ugly mammals are cetaceans, which could at least pass for sauropsids. But nope, of course we have to be apes, the ugliest branch of mammals. Honestly even cute girls kinda gross me out when I consider the fact that we're all monkeys and all human behavior is monkeying around.

>>4925228
>but humans are the only ones capable of speech because it's a very specific feature of our throats that no other hominid has
So is this the reason for our success? it seems like most of our being revolves around speech, even deep down to our thoughts and basically how we conceptualize the whole world

>>4926716
>when I consider the fact that we're all monkeys and all human behavior is monkeying around.
ever listen to a crowd of panicking people (esp. women) while closing your eyes? indistinguishable from screeching monkeys in the jungle. its kinda upsetting every time i notice.

>>4921488
thank you Hitler, very cool

>>4925228
That's pretty fucked up desu

>>4921750
this should be a 4chan banner

Sticking hairs in the candles makes me wonder if the reason human hair grows continuously is so that someone in the troop always has some fresh tinder to make a fire with.

>>4928192
It protects the back from sunburn, its why even bald men can grow a pony tail

>>4921702
6 looks fairly attractive

>>4921702
You're a disgusting piece of shit.

>>4928407
Let me guess, you're not angry at the fact that he's a pedo, but angry at his "racism"?
>>4928309
None of them look even remotely attractive.
>>4928192
>>4928238
Hair is terrible tinder and although it does protect the head from the sun, the excessive length points towards sexual selection.
>>4925228
>There is archeological evidence that old hominids were likely cooking and building boats, but humans are the only ones capable of
And that's completely wrong -
"The Pesse canoe is the world's oldest-known boat. Carbon dating indicates that the boat was constructed during the early mesolithic period between 8040 BC and 7510 BC"
"found in the Netherlands"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pesse_canoe

>>4926716
>Frankly apes are ugly and gross us humans included
>Really the least ugly mammals are cetaceans, which could at least pass for sauropsids
When low functioning autism and barely concealed zoophilia combine. You get comments like anon's.

>>4927832
You're picking up on the disorganization as a commonality. That's it. They actually sound very different. A mob of birds doesn't sound like a mob of people that doesn't sound like a mob of chimpanzees.
>>4926766
>>but humans are the only ones capable of speech because it's a very specific feature of our throats that no other hominid has
>So is this the reason for our success? it seems like most of our being revolves around speech, even deep down to our thoughts and basically how we conceptualize the whole world
I doubt it would have factored into anything more than simply being able to better organize fights. Then as time went on language took a life of its own and became a tool for everything.

>>4922648
>It's because anthropology artists are just failed human artists who can't draw people without uncanny faces.
Or maybe because half-humans are by definition uncanny because they aren't quite human?

>>4922507
>واحدة حرية اشتراكيه
Nothing dumber than thirdies who hate mayoskins adopting socialism and communism straight out of the minds of European/Jewish intellectualism.

>>4922485
>I am a muslim jihadist I don't care about race
You're obviously not a Muslim then because Islam like all the Abrahamic faiths is supremely "racist".
>>4922486
>oh in that case, your so-called prophet was a pedophile
So are 90% of 4channers...
>>4922468
>>4922480
90% of 4chan is openly antiwhite and snowflake anon only gets upset at the 10% that's antiblack. Weird. Smells like an ulterior motive to me.

>>4922482
>you will never have an ethnostate
That's right, Wakanda will never exist.

>>4921477
Your theory falls apart when you consider that East Asians have more Neanderthal/Denisovan admixture than Europeans.
And early race mixing with Australian Aboriginals was British men in distant outposts starved for sex, making do with Abo women.

>>4928414
>Let me guess, you're not angry at the fact that he's a pedo, but angry at his "racism"?
No, I was referring to him being a pedo.

>>4928442
What's this? A normal sane person on the chans haha, cheers anon.

>>4926716
post hidden

>>4928418
Nah, they're right. You ever look closely at a human, learn more about how we are put together, you realize how much an inelegant hackjob we are.

>>4921254
you can still find homo erectus looking people in south america, homo rudolfensis in middle east and neanderthalensis in northern europe.

>>4922498
Notice how he never once said they were closely related my illiterate friend, only that they're both largely stupid. Apparently you are as well.

>>4929877
>Nah, they're right. You ever look closely at a human, learn more about how we are put together, you realize how much an inelegant hackjob we are.
He didn't say that you fucking moron.
He's said humans are ugly and cetaceans the least ugly. He's a fucking zoophile.
He wasn't at all saying Humans are biologically poorly constructed compared to cetaceans. Which isn't true anyway.
Holy shit, It is almost like autism prevents people reading or something. None of you deserve to be alive.

>>4929896
>neurotypical
>zoophobe
Like clockwork

>>4929903
Nobody is scared or homosexuals, pedophiles, zoophiles, autistics or coprophiliacs anon.
You're just mentally ill and evil.

>>4921254
I always question how accurate to reality those reconstructions are

>>4929914
Lol, homosexuals, pedophiles, zoophiles, autistics and coprophiliacs are tiny percentage of the population...
Humans would be extinct already if they were the majority...
Also why in the absolute F are you supporting zoophiles and pedophiles?
You do realize that absolutely nobody likes those people right?
How do you excuse away that crap?
You are by definition evil if you support those two things.
That isn't even debatable.
You're just a mentally ill evil freak.
You're like 0.05% of the population is you want to fuck animals.

Too bad nobody here will ever fuck homo sapiens either

>>4929981
Normal people don't use 4chan, let alone wish death on others, you'd should be eliminated too. You even went and accused me of everything because I disagreed with you, with no knowledge of whether I was any of the previous people responding to you.

>>4930082
You're a zoophile anon. Of course you will never fuck a human lol.
>>4930083
Normal people wish death upon zoophiles and pedos lol. You are a zoophile. You shouldn't be alive. Nobody wants you to be alive.

>>4930123
You’re calling 3 different people zoophile just because they disagree with you

>>4930125
Why are you still alive samefagging zoophile?
Your job was to stop being alive remember?

>>4921702
Based.

>>4930126
Narcissist retard.

>>4930126
What do you call this kind of posting logic where a guy can't handle multiple people arguing with him and has to insist that they are all one person even when they are responding about different things?

>>4930367
wtf, anon. You're a zoophile. Your life is worth absolutely nothing. Zero. Zilch.

>>4930402
Magically four different people appear out of nowhere to defend one person because he's a zoophile?
Lol, sure dude..
Holy shit, you're such a bad liar.

>>4930442
You are so fucking stupid it's unreal, he (or you) included autists and homos in the they should all die spiel, what do you think this website also has a lot of?

>>4926766
If I'm not mistaken, homosapiens also have a different (more mobile) shoulder bone structure that made it easier to chuck spears effectively, making us great hunters in comparison to all other humans.

>>4930445
you're all mentally ill

could you retards shut the fuck up about zoophilia and talk about the funny monkey men

>>4921254
They died cause we were smarter.

>>4931319
And so are you, since you are here on 4chan.

Does anyone have that human populations diagram showing genetic distances? I think it showed abos as being pretty distant, though they might have been close to southern Indians.

>>4932182
>>4932189
>funny monkey men
Considering this thread we aren't that distant from le fuinny monkey men.

>>4921254
I don't know if you meant to set up a "your mom" joke, but you'd do very well to use this setup for one irl

>>4921254
The proliferation of supposed species in human history is a political rather than a scientific choice, because no one dares to say "races" if they want to keep their job, and because the classifications are based on such scant evidence as fragments of bone.. There is not one bit of evidence that any of those depicted in OP's pic would have been unable to interbreed with so-called modern humans if they had been contemporaries. Indeed, there is genomic evidence that some of them did, such as neanderthal in Eurasia and erectus in Africa.

Maybe we just find them ugly because they are just a different species and we haven't seen them irl. Also paleo artists are frauds and I am willing to bet these recreations are nowhere close to what they actually looked like.

>>4921254
>>4921299
erectus literally just look like some average nigga

>>4921254
I personally subscribe to Sam O Nella's sexy neanderthal theory, the idea here is that homo sapien women saw neanderthal men with their strong jaws, big muscles and other features we consider attractive now but exaggerated and decided they'd make for good dads to have kids with, and homo sapien men, being as horny as they are, saw neanderthal women and simply figured ''why not'', granted the ones in OPs pic are very ugly but I've seen pretty enough female neanderthal reconstructions

>>4921434
Neanderthals shouldn’t just be thought of as archaic hominids, they were a group of Homo Sapiens (humans but not “anatomically modern humans”) that got isolated in Europe/West Asia and adapted to the cold climate at the time.